Ranking in collaboration networks using a group based metric

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - 2011
Vinicius Pires M. Freire1, Daniel R. Figueiredo1
1Alberto Luiz Coimbra Institute for Graduate School and Research in Engineering (COPPE), Systems Engineering and Computer Science Program (PESC), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Caixa Postal 68511, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-972, Brazil

Tóm tắt

Abstract Collaboration networks are social networks in which relationships represent some kind of professional collaboration. The study of collaboration networks can help identify individuals or groups that are important or influential within a given community. We start this work by characterizing the structural properties of the scientific collaboration network in the area of Computer Science. In particular, we consider the global network (all individuals) and the Brazilian network (individuals affiliated with Brazilian institutions) and establish a direct comparison between them. Our empirical results indicate that despite exhibiting features found in most social networks, these two networks also have some interesting differences. We then present a novel approach to rank individuals within a group in the network (as opposed to ranking all individuals) using solely their relationships. Intuitively, the importance assigned to an individual by our metric is proportional to the intensity of its relationship to the outside of the group. We use the proposed approach and other classical metrics to rank individuals of the Brazilian network and compare the results with the ranking of the Research Fellowship Program of CNPq (an agency of the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology). The direct comparison indicates the effectiveness of the proposed approach in identifying influential researchers, in particular when considering top ranked individuals. We then extend the proposed approach to rank small groups of individuals (as opposed to single individuals). We apply this and other classical metrics to rank graduate programs in Computer Science in Brazil and compare the results with the ranking of graduate programs provided by CAPES (an agency of the Brazilian Ministry of Education). Our results indicate that the proposed method can effectively identify influential groups such as well-established graduate programs in Brazil.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Barabási AL, Jeong H, Néda Z, Ravasz E, Schubert A, Vicsek T (2002) Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A 311(3–4):590–614

Figueiredo DR (2011) Introdução a redes complexas. In: de Souza AF Jr, Meira W (eds) Atualizações em Informática 2011, PUC-Rio, pp 303–358. Chap 7

Freire VP (2010) Uma métrica para ranqueamento em redes de colaboração baseada em intensidade de relacionamento. Master’s thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)/COPPE, in Portuguese

Gastwirth JL (1972) The estimation of the Lorenz curve and Gini index. Rev Econ Stat 54(3):306–316

Grossman J, Ion P (1995) On a portion of the well-known collaboration graph. Congr Numer 108:129–131, The Erdős Number Project, http://www.oakland.edu/enp/

Huang J, Zhuang Z, Li J, Giles CL (2008) Collaboration over time: characterizing and modeling network evolution. In: International conference on web search and web data mining (WSDM), pp 107–116

Laender AHF, de Lucena CJP, Maldonado JC, de Souza e Silva E, Ziviani N (2008) Assessing the research and education quality of the top Brazilian computer science graduate programs. SIGCSE Bulletin 40(2):135–145

Ley M (2009) Dblp: some lessons learned. Proc VLDB Endow 2(2):1493–1500

Liben-Nowell D, Kleinberg J (2007) The link-prediction problem for social networks. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 58(7):1019–1031

Manning CD, Raghavan P, Schütze H (2008) Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Menezes GV, Ziviani N, Laender AHF, Almeida VAF (2009) A geographical analysis of knowledge production in computer science. In: 18th international conference on World wide web, pp 1041–1050

Nascimento MA, Sander J, Pound J (2003) Analysis of sigmod’s co-authorship graph. SIGMOD Rec 32(3):8–10

Newman MEJ (2001) The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(2):404–409

Newman MEJ (2004a) Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(Suppl 1):5200–5205

Newman MEJ (2004b) Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific coauthorship networks. In: Complex Networks. Springer, Berlin, pp 337–370

Newman MEJ (2010) Networks: an introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Onnela JP, Saramäki J, Hyvönen J, Szabó G, Lazer D, Kaski K, Kertész J, Barabási AL (2007) Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(18):7332–7336

Wagner C, Leydesdorff L (2005) Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Res Policy 34(10):1608–1618

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Thông tin tác giả