Ranging behaviour and excursions of female roe deer during the rut

Adrados, 2002, Global positioning system (GPS) location accuracy improvement due to selective availability removal, CR Biologies, 325, 165, 10.1016/S1631-0691(02)01414-2 Amos, 2001, Do female grey seals select genetically diverse mates?, Anim. Behav., 62, 157, 10.1006/anbe.2001.1739 Andersson, 1994 Angibault, 1993, Détermination de l’âge chez le chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus), Mammalia, 57, 579, 10.1515/mamm.1993.57.4.579 Arnould, 1997, The cost and benefits of territorial tenure, and factors affecting mating success in male Antarctic fur seals, J. Zool. Lond., 241, 649, 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1997.tb05739.x Bertrand, 1996, Effects of parturition on home ranges and social affiliations of female white-tailed deer, J. Wildl. Manage., 60, 899, 10.2307/3802391 Börger, L., 2006. Roe deer mating tactics. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom, 208 pp. Bramley, 1970, Territoriality and reproductive behaviour of roe deer, J. Reprod. Fertil., 11, 43 Brø-Jorgensen, 2002, Overt female mate competition and preference for central males in a lekking antelope, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 99, 9290, 10.1073/pnas.142125899 Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., 1998. A Model Selection and Interference: A Practical Information—Theoretic Approach. Springer Verlag, New York, USA, 353 pp. Burt, 1943, Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals, J. Mammal, 24, 346, 10.2307/1374834 Byers, 1994, Pronghorn females choose vigorous mates, Anim. Behav., 47, 33, 10.1006/anbe.1994.1005 Cargnelutti, 2002, Space use by roe deer in a fragmented landscape some preliminary results, Rev. Ecol. (Terre Vie), 57, 29 Cargnelutti, 2007, Testing GPS performance for wildlife monitoring using mobile collars with known reference points, J. Wildl. Manage., 71, 1380, 10.2193/2006-257 Charlton, 2007, Female red deer prefer the roars of larger males, Biol. Lett., 3, 382, 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0244 Clobert, 2001 Coulon, A., 2006. Etude de l’influence du paysage sur la dispersion du chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus) en milieu fragmenté. Ph.D. Thesis. Université Paul Sabatier, France, 195 pp. Dahle, 2003, Seasonal range size in relation to reproductive strategies in brown bear Ursus arctos, J. Anim. Ecol., 72, 660, 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00737.x Danilkin, 1996 Darwin, 1871 Doerr, 2005, Dispersal range analysis: quantifying individual variation in dispersal behaviour, Oecologia, 142, 1, 10.1007/s00442-004-1707-z Ferguson, 1999, Determinants of home range size for polar bears (Ursus maritimus), Ecol. Lett., 2, 311, 10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00090.x Fisher, 1999, Effects of body size and home range on access to mates and paternity in male bridled nailtail wallabies, Anim. Behav., 58, 121, 10.1006/anbe.1999.1119 Fox, 1997 Hewison, 1996, Annual variation in body composition of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in moderate environmental conditions, Can. J. Zool., 74, 245, 10.1139/z96-031 Hewison, 1998, Social organisation of European roe deer, 189 Hewison, 2005, Big mothers invest more in daughters—reversed sex allocation in a weakly polygynous mammal, Ecol. Lett., 8, 430, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00743.x Hewison, 2007, Using radio-tracking and direct observation to estimate roe deer density in a fragmented landscape—a pilot study, Wildl. Biol., 13, 313, 10.2981/0909-6396(2007)13[313:URADOT]2.0.CO;2 Hogg, 1997, Mating in bighorn sheep: frequent male reproduction via a high-risk “unconventional” tactic, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 41, 33, 10.1007/s002650050361 Johansson, A., 1996. Territorial dynamics and marking behaviour in male roe deer. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Stockholm, Sweden, 44 pp. Kokko, 2006, Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 361, 319, 10.1098/rstb.2005.1784 Labisky, 1998, Spatial mobility of breeding female white-tailed deer in a low density population, J. Wildl. Manage., 62, 1329, 10.2307/3801998 Liberg, 1998, The function of male territoriality, 251 Linnell, J.D.C., 1994. Reproductive tactics and parental care in Norwegian roe deer. Ph.D. Thesis. National University of Ireland, 234 pp. Lotek wireless Inc, 2002. Small and Middle Size Animals GPS Location System. – User's Manual Rev A. Newmarket, Ontario, Canada, 48 pp. McCullagh, 1989 McElligott, 2001, Sexual size dimorphism in fallow deer (Dama dama): do larger, heavier males gain greater mating success?, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 49, 266, 10.1007/s002650000293 Melis, 2005, Do male roe deer clump together during the rut?, Acta Theriol., 50, 253, 10.1007/BF03194488 Min, 1997, Variation in sexually dimorphic traits of male pronghorns, J. Mammal, 78, 31, 10.2307/1382636 Mohr, 1947, Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals, Am. Midl. Nat., 37, 223, 10.2307/2421652 Pays, 2007, The dynamics of group formation in large mammalian herbivores: an analysis in the European roe deer, Anim. Behav., 74, 1429, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.02.012 R Development Core Team, 2006. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://R-projectorg. Rootes, 1993, Cannibalism in the American Alligator, Herpetologica, 49, 99 Rossi, 2001, Male and female spatial behaviour of roe deer in a mountainous habitat during pre-rutting and rutting period, J. Mt. Ecol., 6, 1 San José, 1998, Ranging movements of female roe deer: do home-loving does roam to mate?, Ethology, 104, 721, 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00106.x Sempéré, 1998, Reproductive physiology of roe deer, 161 Sundaresan, 2007, Male harassment influences female movements and associations in Grevy's zebra (Equus grevyi), Behav. Ecol., 18, 860, 10.1093/beheco/arm055 Vanpé, C., 2007. Mating systems and sexual selection in ungulates. New insights from a territorial species with low sexual size dimorphism: the European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Ph.D. Thesis. University of Toulouse and Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, France and Sweden, 304 pp. Vanpé, 2008, Mating system, sexual dimorphism and the opportunity for sexual selection in a territorial ungulate, Behav. Ecol., 19, 309, 10.1093/beheco/arm132