Random versus directionally persistent cell migration
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Lauffenburger, D. A. & Horwitz, A. F. Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell 84, 359–369 (1996).
Ridley, A. J. et al. Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science 302, 1704–1709 (2003).
Stoker, M. & Gherardi, E. Regulation of cell movement: the motogenic cytokines. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1072, 81–102 (1991).
Seppa, H., Grotendorst, G., Seppa, S., Schiffmann, E. & Martin, G. R. Platelet-derived growth factor is chemotactic for fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 92, 584–588 (1982). Identifies PDGF as a chemotactic factor for fibroblasts. This paper is also an excellent resource for understanding how to distinguish between haptotactic, chemotactic, chemokinetic and mitogenic responses when studying cell motility, as well as understanding why it is important to do so.
Arrieumerlou, C. & Meyer, T. A local coupling model and compass parameter for eukaryotic chemotaxis. Dev. Cell 8, 215–227 (2005). Challenges fundamental assumptions that underlie directed cell migration by showing that local signalling in lamellipodia generates small protrusions towards the source of the guidance cue as the basis of chemotaxis in vitro , rather than protrusions being directed by global integration of competing signals.
Carter, S. B. Principles of cell motility: the direction of cell movement and cancer invasion. Nature 208, 1183–1187 (1965).
Zhao, M. Electrical fields in wound healing — an overriding signal that directs cell migration. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 25 Dec 2008 (doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.12.009).
Lo, C. M., Wang, H. B., Dembo, M. & Wang, Y. L. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys. J. 79, 144–152 (2000).
Gail, M. H. & Boone, C. W. The locomotion of mouse fibroblasts in tissue culture. Biophys. J. 10, 980–993 (1970). One of the first studies to examine fibroblast migration in culture by combining time-lapse imaging and quantitative analysis.
Bear, J. E. et al. Antagonism between Ena/VASP proteins and actin filament capping regulates fibroblast motility. Cell 109, 509–521 (2002).
Chen, L. et al. PLA2 and PI3K/PTEN pathways act in parallel to mediate chemotaxis. Dev. Cell 12, 603–614 (2007).
Bosgraaf, L. et al. RasGEF-containing proteins GbpC and GbpD have differential effects on cell polarity and chemotaxis in Dictyostelium. J. Cell Sci. 118, 1899–1910 (2005).
Pankov, R. et al. A Rac switch regulates random versus directionally persistent cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 170, 793–802 (2005). Shows that Rac activity can control the pattern of cell migration during both intrinsic and directed motility by regulating the formation of lateral protrusions.
Andrew, N. & Insall, R. H. Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of PtdIns 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 193–200 (2007).
Fackler, O. T. & Grosse, R. Cell motility through plasma membrane blebbing. J. Cell Biol. 181, 879–884 (2008).
Charest, P. G. & Firtel, R. A. Feedback signalling controls leading-edge formation during chemotaxis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16, 339–347 (2006).
Kay, R. R., Langridge, P., Traynor, D. & Hoeller, O. Changing directions in the study of chemotaxis. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 455–463 (2008).
Petri, B., Phillipson, M. & Kubes, P. The physiology of leukocyte recruitment: an in vivo perspective. J. Immunol. 180, 6439–6446 (2008).
Martini, F. J. et al. Biased selection of leading process branches mediates chemotaxis during tangential neuronal migration. Development 136, 41–50 (2009).
Fischer, R. S., Gardel, M., Ma, X., Adelstein, R. S. & Waterman, C. M. Local cortical tension by myosin II guides 3D endothelial cell branching. Curr. Biol. 19, 260–265 (2009).
Bailly, M., Yan, L., Whitesides, G. M., Condeelis, J. S. & Segall, J. E. Regulation of protrusion shape and adhesion to the substratum during chemotactic responses of mammalian carcinoma cells. Exp. Cell Res. 241, 285–299 (1998).
Harms, B. D., Bassi, G. M., Horwitz, A. R. & Lauffenburger, D. A. Directional persistence of EGF-induced cell migration is associated with stabilization of lamellipodial protrusions. Biophys. J. 88, 1479–1488 (2005).
Garber, B. Quantitative studies on the dependence of cell morphology and motility upon the fine structure of the medium in tissue culture. Exp. Cell Res. 5, 132–146 (1953).
Weiss, P. & Garber, B. Shape and movement of mesenchyme cells as functions of the physical structure of the medium: contributions to a quantitative morphology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 38, 264–280 (1952).
Dunn, G. A. & Heath, J. P. A new hypothesis of contact guidance in tissue cells. Exp. Cell Res. 101, 1–14 (1976).
Nakatsuji, N. & Johnson, K. E. Cell locomotion in vitro by Xenopus laevis gastrula mesodermal cells. Cell. Motil. 2, 149–161 (1982).
Nakatsuji, N. & Johnson, K. E. Ectodermal fragments from normal frog gastrulae condition substrata to support normal and hybrid mesodermal cell migration in vitro. J. Cell Sci. 68, 49–67 (1984).
Nakatsuji, N. & Johnson, K. E. Experimental manipulation of a contact guidance system in amphibian gastrulation by mechanical tension. Nature 307, 453–455 (1984).
Wood, A. Contact guidance on microfabricated substrata: the response of teleost fin mesenchyme cells to repeating topographical patterns. J. Cell Sci. 90, 667–681 (1988).
Webb, A., Clark, P., Skepper, J., Compston, A. & Wood, A. Guidance of oligodendrocytes and their progenitors by substratum topography. J. Cell Sci. 108, 2747–2760 (1995).
Gomez, N., Chen, S. & Schmidt, C. E. Polarization of hippocampal neurons with competitive surface stimuli: contact guidance cues are preferred over chemical ligands. J. R. Soc. Interface 4, 223–233 (2007).
Teixeira, A. I., Abrams, G. A., Bertics, P. J., Murphy, C. J. & Nealey, P. F. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates. J. Cell Sci. 116, 1881–1892 (2003).
Loesberg, W. A. et al. The threshold at which substrate nanogroove dimensions may influence fibroblast alignment and adhesion. Biomaterials 28, 3944–3951 (2007).
Cukierman, E., Pankov, R., Stevens, D. R. & Yamada, K. M. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 294, 1708–1712 (2001).
Beningo, K. A., Dembo, M. & Wang, Y. L. Responses of fibroblasts to anchorage of dorsal extracellular matrix receptors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 18024–18029 (2004).
Lammermann, T. et al. Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing. Nature 453, 51–55 (2008).
Amatangelo, M. D., Bassi, D. E., Klein-Szanto, A. J. & Cukierman, E. Stroma-derived three-dimensional matrices are necessary and sufficient to promote desmoplastic differentiation of normal fibroblasts. Am. J. Pathol. 167, 475–488 (2005).
Doyle, A. D., Wang, F. W., Matsumoto, K. & Yamada, K. M. One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 184, 481–490 (2009). Establishes that aligned fibrillar matrices can be functionally mimicked by simple 1D lines, but not 2D surfaces, to promote directional cell migration. Also introduces a novel micropatterning technique for generating matrix patterns.
Schnell, E. et al. Guidance of glial cell migration and axonal growth on electrospun nanofibers of poly-ɛ-caprolactone and a collagen/poly-ɛ-caprolactone blend. Biomaterials 28, 3012–3025 (2007).
Tysseling-Mattiace, V. M. et al. Self-assembling nanofibers inhibit glial scar formation and promote axon elongation after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 28, 3814–3823 (2008). Demonstrates the in vivo use of self-assembling peptide amphiphile molecules to generate nanofibres that inhibit glial cell differentiation and scar tissue formation while promoting motor and sensory neuron regeneration at the site of a spinal cord injury.
Sidani, M., Wyckoff, J., Xue, C., Segall, J. E. & Condeelis, J. Probing the microenvironment of mammary tumours using multiphoton microscopy. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 11, 151–163 (2006).
Provenzano, P. P. et al. Collagen density promotes mammary tumour initiation and progression. BMC Med. 6, 11 (2008).
Provenzano, P. P., Inman, D. R., Eliceiri, K. W., Trier, S. M. & Keely, P. J. Contact guidance mediated three-dimensional cell migration is regulated by Rho/ROCK-dependent matrix reorganization. Biophys. J. 95, 5374–5384 (2008). Uses multiple technical methods to show that cancer cells reorganize the ECM perpendicular to tumour explants, a process that depends on Rho kinase and precedes cell migration and invasion.
Iden, S. & Collard, J. G. Crosstalk between small GTPases and polarity proteins in cell polarization. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 846–859 (2008).
Etienne-Manneville, S. & Hall, A. Integrin-mediated activation of Cdc42 controls cell polarity in migrating astrocytes through PKCζ. Cell 106, 489–498 (2001).
Shen, Y. et al. Nudel binds Cdc42GAP to modulate Cdc42 activity at the leading edge of migrating cells. Dev. Cell 14, 342–353 (2008).
Gomes, E. R., Jani, S. & Gundersen, G. G. Nuclear movement regulated by Cdc42, MRCK, myosin, and actin flow establishes MTOC polarization in migrating cells. Cell 121, 451–463 (2005).
Kupfer, A., Louvard, D. & Singer, S. J. Polarization of the Golgi apparatus and the microtubule-organizing center in cultured fibroblasts at the edge of an experimental wound. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79, 2603–2607 (1982).
Cau, J. & Hall, A. Cdc42 controls the polarity of the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons through two distinct signal transduction pathways. J. Cell Sci. 118, 2579–2587 (2005).
Siegrist, S. E. & Doe, C. Q. Microtubule-induced cortical cell polarity. Genes Dev. 21, 483–496 (2007).
Bergmann, J. E., Kupfer, A. & Singer, S. J. Membrane insertion at the leading-edge of motile fibroblasts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80, 1367–1371 (1983).
Prigozhina, N. L. & Waterman-Storer, C. M. Protein kinase D-mediated anterograde membrane trafficking is required for fibroblast motility. Curr. Biol. 14, 88–98 (2004).
Tan, I., Yong, J., Dong, J. M., Lim, L. & Leung, T. A tripartite complex containing MRCK modulates lamellar actomyosin retrograde flow. Cell 135, 123–136 (2008).
Nishita, M. et al. Filopodia formation mediated by receptor tyrosine kinase Ror2 is required for Wnt5a-induced cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 175, 555–562 (2006).
Schlessinger, K., McManus, E. J. & Hall, A. Cdc42 and noncanonical Wnt signal transduction pathways cooperate to promote cell polarity. J. Cell Biol. 178, 355–361 (2007).
Nomachi, A. et al. Receptor tyrosine kinase Ror2 mediates Wnt5a-induced polarized cell migration by activating c-Jun N-terminal kinase via actin-binding protein filamin A. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 27973–27981 (2008).
Pestonjamasp, K. N. et al. Rac1 links leading edge and uropod events through Rho and myosin activation during chemotaxis. Blood 108, 2814–2820 (2006).
Sander, E. E., ten Klooster, J. P., van Delft, S., van der Kammen, R. A. & Collard, J. G. Rac downregulates Rho activity: reciprocal balance between both GTPases determines cellular morphology and migratory behaviour. J. Cell Biol. 147, 1009–1022 (1999).
Pertz, O., Hodgson, L., Klemke, R. L. & Hahn, K. M. Spatiotemporal dynamics of RhoA activity in migrating cells. Nature 440, 1069–1072 (2006).
Nishimura, T. et al. PAR-6–PAR-3 mediates Cdc42-induced Rac activation through the Rac GEFs STEF/Tiam1. Nature Cell Biol. 7, 270–277 (2005).
Pegtel, D. M. et al. The Par–Tiam1 complex controls persistent migration by stabilizing microtubule-dependent front–rear polarity. Curr. Biol. 17, 1623–1634 (2007). Shows that the Par polarity complex, previously known to establish apical–basal polarity, drives front–rear polarization in migrating keratinocytes; blocking Par complex function increases random migration and inhibits chemotaxis, probably by interfering with microtubule stabilization at the leading edge downstream of Rac signalling.
Nakayama, M. et al. Rho-kinase phosphorylates PAR-3 and disrupts PAR complex formation. Dev. Cell 14, 205–215 (2008).
Drabek, K. et al. Role of CLASP2 in microtubule stabilization and the regulation of persistent motility. Curr. Biol. 16, 2259–2264 (2006).
Beardsley, A. et al. Loss of caveolin-1 polarity impedes endothelial cell polarization and directional movement. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 3541–3547 (2005).
Grande-Garcia, A. et al. Caveolin-1 regulates cell polarization and directional migration through Src kinase and Rho GTPases. J. Cell Biol. 177, 683–694 (2007).
del Pozo, M. A. et al. Phospho-caveolin-1 mediates integrin-regulated membrane domain internalization. Nature Cell Biol. 7, 901–908 (2005).
Gomez, T. M., Robles, E., Poo, M. & Spitzer, N. C. Filopodial calcium transients promote substrate-dependent growth cone turning. Science 291, 1983–1987 (2001).
Gomez, T. M. & Zheng, J. Q. The molecular basis for calcium-dependent axon pathfinding. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 7, 115–125 (2006).
Jin, M. et al. Ca2+-dependent regulation of rho GTPases triggers turning of nerve growth cones. J. Neurosci. 25, 2338–2347 (2005).
Zheng, J. Q. & Poo, M. M. Calcium signalling in neuronal motility. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 23, 375–404 (2007).
Kolsch, V., Charest, P. G. & Firtel, R. A. The regulation of cell motility and chemotaxis by phospholipid signalling. J. Cell Sci. 121, 551–559 (2008).
van Haastert, P. J., Keizer-Gunnink, I. & Kortholt, A. Essential role of PI3-kinase and phospholipase A2 in Dictyostelium discoideum chemotaxis. J. Cell Biol. 177, 809–816 (2007).
Haugh, J. M., Codazzi, F., Teruel, M. & Meyer, T. Spatial sensing in fibroblasts mediated by 3' phosphoinositides. J. Cell Biol. 151, 1269–1280 (2000).
Weiger, M. C. et al. Spontaneous phosphoinositide 3-kinase signalling dynamics drive spreading and random migration of fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 122, 313–323 (2009).
Nobes, C. D., Hawkins, P., Stephens, L. & Hall, A. Activation of the small GTP-binding proteins rho and rac by growth factor receptors. J. Cell Sci. 108, 225–233 (1995).
Oude Weernink, P. A., Han, L., Jakobs, K. H. & Schmidt, M. Dynamic phospholipid signalling by G protein-coupled receptors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1768, 888–900 (2007).
Chae, Y. C. et al. Phospholipase D activity regulates integrin-mediated cell spreading and migration by inducing GTP-Rac translocation to the plasma membrane. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 3111–3123 (2008).
Kim, J. H., Kim, H. W., Jeon, H., Suh, P. G. & Ryu, S. H. Phospholipase D1 regulates cell migration in a lipase activity-independent manner. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 15747–15756 (2006).
Nishikimi, A. et al. Sequential regulation of DOCK2 dynamics by two phospholipids during neutrophil chemotaxis. Science 324, 384–387 (2009).
Monypenny, J. et al. Cdc42 and Rac family GTPases regulate mode and speed but not direction of primary fibroblast migration during platelet-derived growth factor-dependent chemotaxis. Mol. Cell Biol. 29, 2730–2747 (2009).
Kraynov, V. S. et al. Localized Rac activation dynamics visualized in living cells. Science 290, 333–337 (2000). Highlights the importance of considering cell-biological dynamics when studying the signalling mechanisms that drive cell migration; live cell imaging shows that Rac activity is targeted to the leading edge of migrating fibroblasts.
Vidali, L., Chen, F., Cicchetti, G., Ohta, Y. & Kwiatkowski, D. J. Rac1-null mouse embryonic fibroblasts are motile and respond to platelet-derived growth factor. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 2377–2390 (2006).
Bard, J. B. & Hay, E. D. The behaviour of fibroblasts from the developing avian cornea. Morphology and movement in situ and in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 67, 400–418 (1975). Comprehensive study of the comparative morphology and behaviour of the same population of fibroblasts migrating on glass, in 3D collagen gels or in situ in the developing avian cornea, providing a clear warning of the dangers of using 2D environments to understand cell migration normally occurring in 3D tissues.
Bass, M. D. et al. Syndecan-4-dependent Rac1 regulation determines directional migration in response to the extracellular matrix. J. Cell Biol. 177, 527–538 (2007). Brings together the themes of the extracellular environment, localized intracellular signalling and random versus directionally persistent cell migration by showing that syndecan 4 senses external membrane topography to limit RAC1 activity to the leading edge and promote directionally persistent cell migration.
Nobes, C. D. & Hall, A. Rho, rac, and cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia. Cell 81, 53–62 (1995).
Yip, S. C. et al. The distinct roles of Ras and Rac in PI 3-kinase-dependent protrusion during EGF-stimulated cell migration. J. Cell Sci. 120, 3138–3146 (2007).
Miki, H., Suetsugu, S. & Takenawa, T. WAVE, a novel WASP-family protein involved in actin reorganization induced by Rac. EMBO J. 17, 6932–6941 (1998).
Sells, M. A. et al. Human p21-activated kinase (Pak1) regulates actin organization in mammalian cells. Curr. Biol. 7, 202–210 (1997).
Suetsugu, S., Yamazaki, D., Kurisu, S. & Takenawa, T. Differential roles of WAVE1 and WAVE2 in dorsal and peripheral ruffle formation for fibroblast cell migration. Dev. Cell 5, 595–609 (2003).
Sells, M. A., Boyd, J. T. & Chernoff, J. p21-activated kinase 1 (Pak1) regulates cell motility in mammalian fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 145, 837–849 (1999).
Higuchi, M., Onishi, K., Kikuchi, C. & Gotoh, Y. Scaffolding function of PAK in the PDK1-Akt pathway. Nature Cell Biol. 10, 1356–1364 (2008).
Primo, L. et al. Essential role of PDK1 in regulating endothelial cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 176, 1035–1047 (2007).
Carlier, M. F. et al. Actin depolymerizing factor (ADF/cofilin) enhances the rate of filament turnover: implication in actin-based motility. J. Cell Biol. 136, 1307–1322 (1997).
Hotulainen, P., Paunola, E., Vartiainen, M. K. & Lappalainen, P. Actin-depolymerizing factor and cofilin-1 play overlapping roles in promoting rapid F-actin depolymerization in mammalian nonmuscle cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 649–664 (2005).
Danen, E. H. et al. Integrins control motile strategy through a Rho-cofilin pathway. J. Cell Biol. 169, 515–526 (2005).
White, D. P., Caswell, P. T. & Norman, J. C. αvβ3 and α5β1 integrin recycling pathways dictate downstream Rho kinase signalling to regulate persistent cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 177, 515–525 (2007).
Sidani, M. et al. Cofilin determines the migration behaviour and turning frequency of metastatic cancer cells. J. Cell Biol. 179, 777–791 (2007).
Denker, S. P. & Barber, D. L. Cell migration requires both ion translocation and cytoskeletal anchoring by the Na-H exchanger NHE1. J. Cell Biol. 159, 1087–1096 (2002).
van Rheenen, J. et al. EGF-induced PIP2 hydrolysis releases and activates cofilin locally in carcinoma cells. J. Cell Biol. 179, 1247–1259 (2007).
Frantz, C. et al. Cofilin is a pH sensor for actin free barbed end formation: role of phosphoinositide binding. J. Cell Biol. 183, 865–879 (2008).
Caswell, P. T. & Norman, J. C. Integrin trafficking and the control of cell migration. Traffic 7, 14–21 (2006).
Nishimura, T. & Kaibuchi, K. Numb controls integrin endocytosis for directional cell migration with aPKC and PAR-3. Dev. Cell 13, 15–28 (2007).
Woods, A. J., White, D. P., Caswell, P. T. & Norman, J. C. PKD1/PKCμ promotes αvβ3 integrin recycling and delivery to nascent focal adhesions. EMBO J. 23, 2531–2543 (2004).
Roberts, M., Barry, S., Woods, A., van der Sluijs, P. & Norman, J. PDGF-regulated rab4-dependent recycling of αvβ3 integrin from early endosomes is necessary for cell adhesion and spreading. Curr. Biol. 11, 1392–1402 (2001).
Caswell, P. T. et al. Rab-coupling protein coordinates recycling of α5β1 integrin and EGFR1 to promote cell migration in 3D microenvironments. J. Cell Biol. 183, 143–155 (2008).
Caswell, P. T. et al. Rab25 associates with α5β1 integrin to promote invasive migration in 3D microenvironments. Dev. Cell 13, 496–510 (2007).
Strachan, L. R. & Condic, M. L. Cranial neural crest recycle surface integrins in a substratum-dependent manner to promote rapid motility. J. Cell Biol. 167, 545–554 (2004).
Mostafavi-Pour, Z. et al. Integrin-specific signalling pathways controlling focal adhesion formation and cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 161, 155–167 (2003).
Saoncella, S. et al. Syndecan-4 signals cooperatively with integrins in a Rho-dependent manner in the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 2805–2810 (1999).
Nishiya, N., Kiosses, W. B., Han, J. & Ginsberg, M. H. An α4 integrin–paxillin–Arf-GAP complex restricts Rac activation to the leading edge of migrating cells. Nature Cell Biol. 7, 343–352 (2005).
De Calisto, J., Araya, C., Marchant, L., Riaz, C. F. & Mayor, R. Essential role of non-canonical Wnt signalling in neural crest migration. Development 132, 2587–2597 (2005).
Matthews, H. K. et al. Directional migration of neural crest cells in vivo is regulated by syndecan-4/Rac1 and non-canonical Wnt signalling/RhoA. Development 135, 1771–1780 (2008).
Trainor, P. A. Specification of neural crest cell formation and migration in mouse embryos. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 16, 683–693 (2005).
Abercrombie, M. & Heaysman, J. E. Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture: II. “Monolayering” of fibroblasts. Exp. Cell Res. 6, 293–306 (1954).
Carmona-Fontaine, C. et al. Contact inhibition of locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration. Nature 456, 957–961 (2008). Shows how the basic cell biological processes of contact inhibition of movement, non-canonical Wnt signalling and RHOA-mediated actin–myosin contraction combine to trigger directional migration of neural crest cells in vivo .
Totsukawa, G. et al. Distinct roles of ROCK (Rho-kinase) and MLCK in spatial regulation of MLC phosphorylation for assembly of stress fibers and focal adhesions in 3T3 fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 150, 797–806 (2000).
Chrzanowska-Wodnicka, M. & Burridge, K. Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions. J. Cell Biol. 133, 1403–1415 (1996).
Van Keymeulen, A. et al. To stabilize neutrophil polarity, PIP3 and Cdc42 augment RhoA activity at the back as well as signals at the front. J. Cell Biol. 174, 437–445 (2006).
Wessels, D., Lusche, D. F., Kuhl, S., Heid, P. & Soll, D. R. PTEN plays a role in the suppression of lateral pseudopod formation during Dictyostelium motility and chemotaxis. J. Cell Sci. 120, 2517–2531 (2007).
Vicente-Manzanares, M., Zareno, J., Whitmore, L., Choi, C. K. & Horwitz, A. F. Regulation of protrusion, adhesion dynamics, and polarity by myosins IIA and IIB in migrating cells. J. Cell Biol. 176, 573–580 (2007).
Even-Ram, S. et al. Myosin IIA regulates cell motility and actomyosin-microtubule crosstalk. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 299–309 (2007).
Lo, C. M. et al. Nonmuscle myosin IIb is involved in the guidance of fibroblast migration. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 982–989 (2004).
Vicente-Manzanares, M., Koach, M. A., Whitmore, L., Lamers, M. L. & Horwitz, A. F. Segregation and activation of myosin IIB creates a rear in migrating cells. J. Cell Biol. 183, 543–554 (2008).
Weeraratna, A. T. et al. Wnt5a signalling directly affects cell motility and invasion of metastatic melanoma. Cancer Cell 1, 279–288 (2002).
Witze, E. S., Litman, E. S., Argast, G. M., Moon, R. T. & Ahn, N. G. Wnt5a control of cell polarity and directional movement by polarized redistribution of adhesion receptors. Science 320, 365–369 (2008).
Dodd, J. & Jessell, T. M. Axon guidance and the patterning of neuronal projections in vertebrates. Science 242, 692–699 (1988).
Heit, B. et al. PTEN functions to 'prioritize' chemotactic cues and prevent 'distraction' in migrating neutrophils. Nature Immunol. 9, 743–752 (2008). Combines in vitro and in vivo approaches to model the complex environment found during the inflammatory neutrophil response, in which cells are often forced to choose between competing guidance cues. It exemplifies the innovative experimentation needed to decipher the complex mechanisms underlying directional cell migration.
Jaffe, A. B. & Hall, A. Rho GTPases: biochemistry and biology. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 247–269 (2005).
Bos, J. L., Rehmann, H. & Wittinghofer, A. GEFs and GAPs: critical elements in the control of small G proteins. Cell 129, 865–877 (2007).
Kestler, H. A. & Kuhl, M. From individual Wnt pathways towards a Wnt signalling network. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 363, 1333–1347 (2008).
Croce, J. C. & McClay, D. R. The canonical Wnt pathway in embryonic axis polarity. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 17, 168–174 (2006).