Rancher Preferences for a Payment for Ecosystem Services Program in Southwestern Wyoming
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ajzen, 1980
Bastian, 2004
Bastian, 2017, Landowner and land trust agent preferences for conservation easements: implications for sustainable land uses and landscapes, Landsc. Urban Plan., 157, 1, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.030
Beharry-Borg, 2013, Evaluating farmers' likely participation in a payment programme for water quality protection in the UK uplands, Reg. Environ. Chang., 13, 633, 10.1007/s10113-012-0282-9
Blevins, 2015
Broch, 2012, Using choice experiments to investigate the policy relevance of heterogeneity in farmer agri-environmental contract preferences, Environ. Resour. Econ., 51, 561, 10.1007/s10640-011-9512-8
Burton, 2008, Exploring farmers' cultural resistance to voluntary agri-environmental schemes, Sociol. Rural., 48, 16, 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00452.x
Cheatum, 2011, Payments for ecosystem services: a California rancher perspective
Christensen, 2011, Determinants of farmers' willingness to participate in subsidy schemes for pesticide-free buffer zones—a choice experiment study, Ecol. Econ., 70, 1558, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.021
Connelly, 1997, Long-term changes in sage grouse Centrocercus urophasianus populations in western North America, Wildl. Biol., 3, 229, 10.2981/wlb.1997.028
Costedoat, 2016, Cash only? Unveiling preferences for a PES contract through a choice experiment in Chiapas, Mexico, Land Use Policy, 58, 302, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.023
Cranford, 2011, Community conservation and a two-stage approach to payments for ecosystem services, Ecol. Econ., 71, 89, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.007
Cranford, 2014, Credit-based payments for ecosystem services: evidence from a choice experiment in Ecuador, World Dev., 64, 503, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.06.019
Cropper, 2012, Factors affecting land trust agents' preferences for conservation easements, J. Reg. Anal. Policy, 42, 88
Deisenroth, 2013, Using revealed preference behavioral models to correctly account for substitution effects in economic impact analysis, J. Reg. Anal. Policy, 43, 157
Dillman, 1978
Duke, 2011
Duke, 2014, Payments for ecosystem services and landowner interest: informing program design trade-offs in Western Panama, Ecol. Econ., 103, 44, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.013
Eagly, 1993
ECONorthwest, 2006, Economic value of water in Wyoming's Green River basin
Engel, 2008, Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues, Ecol. Econ., 65, 663, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011
Espinosa-Goded, 2010, What do farmers want from agri-environmental scheme design? A choice experiment approach, J. Agric. Econ., 61, 259, 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00244.x
Falconer, 2000, Farm-level constraints on agri-environmental scheme participation: a transactional perspective, J. Rural. Stud., 16, 379, 10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00066-2
Federal Register, 2016, vol. 81
Fedy, 2014, Habitat prioritization across large landscapes, multiple seasons, and novel areas: an example using greater sage-grouse in Wyoming, Wildl. Monogr., 190, 1, 10.1002/wmon.1014
Greiner, 2014, Design considerations of a choice experiment to estimate likely participation by north Australian pastoralists in contractual biodiversity conservation, J. Choice Model., 10, 34, 10.1016/j.jocm.2014.01.002
Hansen, 2015, Development of a conservation exchange in the Upper Green River basin of southwestern Wyoming
Hensher, 2005
Holloran, 2010, Yearling greater sage-grouse response to energy development in Wyoming, J. Wildl. Manag., 74, 65, 10.2193/2008-291
Kaczan, 2013, Designing a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program to reduce deforestation in Tanzania: an assessment of payment approaches, Ecol. Econ., 95, 20, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.011
Kosoy, 2007, Payments for environmental services in watersheds: insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America, Ecol. Econ., 61, 446, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.016
Kramer, 2009, Ecosystem services, markets, and red wolf habitat: results from a farm operator survey
Kuhfeld, 1994, Efficient experimental design with marketing research, J. Mark. Res., 31, 545, 10.2307/3151882
Lancaster, 1966, A new approach to consumer theory, J. Polit. Econ., 74, 132, 10.1086/259131
Langpap, 2004, Conservation incentives programs for endangered species: an analysis of landowner participation, Land Econ., 80, 375, 10.2307/3654727
Layton, 2009, Payments for ecosystem services programs: predicting landowner enrollment and opportunity cost using a beta-binomial model, Environ. Resour. Econ., 44, 415, 10.1007/s10640-009-9293-5
List, 2001, What experimental protocol influences disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values?, Environ. Resour. Econ., 20, 241, 10.1023/A:1012791822804
Loomis, 2014, Strategies for overcoming hypothetical bias in stated preference surveys, J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 39, 34
McFadden, 1974, Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, 105
McKenney, 2009, Policy development for biodiversity offsets: a review of offset frameworks, Environ. Manag., 45, 165, 10.1007/s00267-009-9396-3
Mead, 2015
Mettepenningen, 2009, Measuring private transaction costs of European agri-environmental schemes, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 52, 649, 10.1080/09640560902958206
Morey, 1999, Two RUMs uncloaked: nested logit models of site choice and nested logit models of participation and site choice, 65
Morey, 1993, A repeated nested-logit model of Atlantic salmon fishing, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 75, 578, 10.2307/1243565
Pagiola, 2005, Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America, World Dev., 33, 237, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.011
Rolfe, 2004, Designing the choice modelling survey instrument for establishing riparian buffers in the Fitzroy Basin
Ruto, 2009, Investigating farmers' preferences for the design of agri-environment schemes: a choice experiment approach, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 52, 631, 10.1080/09640560902958172
Sage Grouse Initiative
Sawyer, 2014
Schnepf, 1994
Torres, 2013, Payments for ecosystem services and rural development: Landowners' preferences and potential participation in western Mexico, Ecosyst. Serv., 6, 72, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.03.002
Train, 2000, Halton sequences for mixed logit
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2014
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2015
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2015
Vanslembrouck, 2002, Determinants of willingness of Belgian farmers to participate in agri-environmental measures, J. Agric. Econ., 53, 489, 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2002.tb00034.x
Walker, 2007, Greater sage-grouse population response to energy development and habitat loss, J. Wildl. Manag., 71, 2644, 10.2193/2006-529
Wilson, 2000, Financial imperative or conservation concern? EU farmers' motivation for participation in voluntary agri-environmental schemes, Environ. Plan. A, 32, 2161, 10.1068/a3311
Zbinden, 2005, Paying for environmental services: an analysis of participation in Costa Rica's PSA program, World Dev., 33, 255, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.012