Railway line capacity consumption of different railway signalling systems under scheduled and disturbed conditions
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abril, 2008, An assessment of railway capacity, Transp. Res. Part E, 44, 774, 10.1016/j.tre.2007.04.001
Albrecht, 2006, Reconstruction of train trajectories from track occupation data to determine the effects of a driver information system, vol. 88, 207
1995
Bartholomeus, 2011, Capacity effects of ERTMS Level 2 from a Dutch perspective, Signal+Draht, 103, 34
Caimi, 2012, A model predictive control approach for discrete-time rescheduling in complex central railway station areas, Comput. Oper. Res., 39, 2578, 10.1016/j.cor.2012.01.003
Corman, 2009, Evaluation of green wave policy in real-time railway traffic management, Transp. Res. Part C, 17, 607, 10.1016/j.trc.2009.04.001
Corman, 2009, Rescheduling dense train traffic over complex station interlocking areas, vol. 5868, 369
Corman, 2011, Effectiveness of dynamic reordering and rerouting of trains in a complicated and densely occupied station area, Transp. Plann. Technol., 34, 341, 10.1080/03081060.2011.577152
Corman, 2012, Optimal inter-area coordination of train rescheduling decisions, Transp. Res. Part E, 48, 71, 10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.002
D’Ariano, 2009, An advanced real-time train dispatching system for minimizing the propagation of delays in a dispatching area under severe disturbances, Networks Spatial Econ., 9, 63, 10.1007/s11067-008-9088-1
D’Ariano, 2007, Conflict resolution and train speed coordination for solving real-time timetable perturbations, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 8, 208, 10.1109/TITS.2006.888605
D’Ariano, 2007, A branch and bound algorithm for scheduling trains in a railway network, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 183, 643, 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.034
Dingler, M.H., Lai, Y.C., Barkan, C.P.L., 2010. Effects of communications-based train control and electronically controlled pneumatic brakes on railroad capacity. Transportation Research Record, 2159, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 77–84.
Goverde, 2007, Railway timetable stability analysis using max-plus system theory, Transp. Res. Part B, 41, 179, 10.1016/j.trb.2006.02.003
Goverde, 2011, A coupling approach to estimating the Lyapunov exponent of stochastic max-plus linear systems, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 210, 249, 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.09.035
Goverde, R.M.P., Hansen, I.A., Corman, F., D’Ariano, A., Trinckauf, J., 2012. Innovatie op het spoor en mogelijkheden van ERTMS in Nederland (Innovation on the railways and opportunities of ERTMS in the Netherlands, in Dutch). Kamerstuk kst-32707-11, Dutch Parliament, The Hague.
2008
Hirai, 2006, An algorithm for train rescheduling using rescheduling pattern description language R, vol. 88, 551
Invensys Rail Group (IRG), 2007. Transportation capacity research paper – a comparison of the costs of different methods of increasing capacity in road & rail environments, London, UK.
Kecman, 2012, Process mining of train describer event data and automatic conflict identification, vol. 127, 227
Lai, 2013, Development of analytical capacity models for conventional railways with advanced signaling systems, ASCE J. Transp. Eng., 138, 961, 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000388
Landex, 2009, Evaluation of railway networks with single track operation using the UIC 406 capacity method, Networks Spatial Econ., 9, 7, 10.1007/s11067-008-9090-7
Lindner, 2011, Applicability of the analytical UIC Code 406 compression method for evaluating line and station capacity, J. Rail Transp. Plann. Manage., 1, 49, 10.1016/j.jrtpm.2011.09.002
Lindner, T., Pachl, J., 2010. Recommendations for enhancing UIC code 406 method to evaluate railroad infrastructure capacity. In: TRB 89th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, Transportation Research Board, Washington.
Lusby, 2013, A set packing inspired method for real-time junction train routing, Comput. Oper. Res., 40, 713, 10.1016/j.cor.2011.12.004
Mascis, 2002, Job shop scheduling with blocking and no-wait constraints, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 143, 498, 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00338-1
Medeossi, 2011, A method for using stochastic blocking times to improve timetable planning, J. Rail Transp. Plann. Manage., 1, 1, 10.1016/j.jrtpm.2011.07.001
Pachl, 2002
ProRail, 2010. Technische vergelijking tussen NS54 ATB-EG en ERTMS Level 2 (Technical comparison between NS’54 ATB-EG and ERTMS Level 2, in Dutch). Technical Report EDMS 2472676, ProRail, Utrecht, 26 januari 2010.
Rodriguez, 2007, A constraint programming model for real-time train scheduling at junctions, Transp. Res. Part B, 41, 231, 10.1016/j.trb.2006.02.006
2009
Törnquist, 2007, Railway traffic disturbance management: an experimental analysis of disturbance complexity, management objectives and limitations in planning horizon, Transp. Res. Part A, 41, 249
Transport Research Laboratory (TRL), 2010. ERTMS Level 3 Risks and Benefits to UK Railways. Wokingham, UK.
UIC, 2004. UIC Code 406: Capacity. International Union of Railways, Paris.
UIC, 2008. Influence of ETCS on the line capacity: Generic study. International Union of Railways, Paris.
UIC, 2010. Influence of the European Train Control System (ETCS) on the capacity of nodes. International Union of Railways, Paris.
2009