Radiologic Quality and Safety: Mapping Value Into Radiology

Journal of the American College of Radiology - Tập 2 Số 12 - Trang 992-1000 - 2005
Stephen J. Swensen1, Charles D. Johnson1
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Mallon, 2000

1999

Federal Aviation Administration, Office of System Safety. Aviation reporting system database 1999-NASDAC.FAA.GOV/Safety.data.

Brennan, 1991, Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients, N Engl J Med, 324, 370, 10.1056/NEJM199102073240604

1995

Jarvik, 2003, Rapid magnetic resonance imaging vs radiographs for patients with low back pain, JAMA, 289, 2810, 10.1001/jama.289.21.2810

Anderson, 2003, It’s the prices, stupid, Health Aff (Millwood), 22, 89, 10.1377/hlthaff.22.3.89

Thrall, 2004, The emerging role of pay-for-performance contracting for health care services, Radiology, 233, 637, 10.1148/radiol.2333041412

Tosczak, 2004, UnitedHealth trying to limit imaging use, The Business Journal

National Imaging Associates. The clear radiology benefits management solution. Available at: http://www.radmd.com/index.html. Accessed July 30, 2004.

Beam, 2003, Evaluation of proscriptive health care policy implementation in screening mammography, Radiology, 229, 534, 10.1148/radiol.2292021585

Pijl, 2004, Quantitative analysis of focal masses at MR imaging, Radiology, 231, 737, 10.1148/radiol.2313030173

McEnery, 2000, Integration of radiologist peer review into clinical review workstation, J Digit Imaging, 13, 101, 10.1007/BF03167636

Beam, 1996, Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists, Arch Intern Med, 156, 209, 10.1001/archinte.1996.00440020119016

Gitlin, 2004, Comparison of “B” readers’ interpretations of chest radiographs for asbestos related changes, Acad Radiol, 11, 843, 10.1016/j.acra.2004.04.012

Goddard, 2001, Error in radiology, Br J Radiol, 74, 949, 10.1259/bjr.74.886.740949

Vock, 1987, Frequent errors in the interpretation of chest x-ray films, Schweiz Med Wochenschr, 117, 928

Leslie, 2000, The influence of clinical information on the reporting of CT by radiologists, Br J Radiol, 73, 1052, 10.1259/bjr.73.874.11271897

Shaw, 1990, Inter-observer variation in interpretation of chest x-rays, Scott Med J, 35, 140, 10.1177/003693309003500505

Markus, 1990, Double-contrast barium enema studies, Radiology, 175, 155, 10.1148/radiology.175.1.2315474

Wakeley, 1995, Audit of the value of double reading magnetic resonance imaging films, Br J Radiol, 68, 358, 10.1259/0007-1285-68-808-358

Berwick, 2001, Not again!, BMJ, 322, 247, 10.1136/bmj.322.7281.247

Fitzgerald, 2001, Error in radiology, Clin Radiol, 56, 938, 10.1053/crad.2001.0858

Robinson, 1997, Radiology’s Achilles’ heel, Br J Radiol, 70, 1085, 10.1259/bjr.70.839.9536897

Quekel, 1999, Miss rate of lung cancer on the chest radiograph in clinical practice, Chest, 115, 720, 10.1378/chest.115.3.720

Siegle, 1998, Rates of disagreement in imaging interpretation in a group of community hospitals, Acad Radiol, 5, 148, 10.1016/S1076-6332(98)80277-8

White, 1994, The role of previous radiographs and reports in the interpretation of current radiographs, Invest Radiol, 29, 263, 10.1097/00004424-199403000-00002

Anderson, 1994, The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screening, Clin Radiol, 49, 248, 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)81850-1

Bird, 1990, Professional quality assurance for mammography screening programs, Radiology, 177, 587, 10.1148/radiology.177.2.2217807

Brenner, 1991, Medicolegal aspects of breast imaging, Am J Roentgenol, 156, 719, 10.2214/ajr.156.4.2003433

Yerushalmy, 1950, The role of dual reading in mass radiography, Am Rev Tuberc, 61, 443

Stradling, 1955, Reducing observer error in a 70-mm chest-radiography service for general practitioners, Lancet, 1, 1247, 10.1016/S0140-6736(55)91021-7

Hessel, 1978, Improving performance by multiple interpretations of chest radiographs, Radiology, 127, 589, 10.1148/127.3.589

Seradour, 1996, Dual reading in a non-specialized breast cancer screening programme, Breast, 5, 398, 10.1016/S0960-9776(96)90103-4

Brealey, 2001, Measuring the effects of image interpretation, Clin Radiol, 56, 341, 10.1053/crad.2001.0678

Brealey, 2001, Bias in plain film reading performance studies, Br J Radiol, 74, 307, 10.1259/bjr.74.880.740307

Robinson, 1996, Plain film reporting by radiographers, Br J Radiol, 69, 1171, 10.1259/0007-1285-69-828-1171

Brealey, 2003, Accident and emergency and general practitioner plain radiograph reporting by radiographers and radiologists, Br J Radiol, 76, 57, 10.1259/bjr/68918327

LaFortune, 1998, The radiological report, Can Assoc Radiol J, 39, 140

2001

Sobel, 1996, Information content and clarity of radiologists’ reports for chest radiography, Acad Radiol, 3, 709, 10.1016/S1076-6332(96)80407-7

Clinger, 1988, Radiology reporting, Radiology, 169, 825, 10.1148/radiology.169.3.3187005

Langlotz, 2002, The completeness of existing lexicons for representing radiology report information, J Digit Imaging, 15, 201, 10.1007/s10278-002-5046-5

Hobby, 2000, Communication of doubt and certainty in radiological reports, Br J Radiol, 73, 999, 10.1259/bjr.73.873.11064655

Naik, 2001, Radiology reports, Am J Roentgenol, 176, 591, 10.2214/ajr.176.3.1760591

Khorasani, 2003, Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports?, Acad Radiol, 10, 685, 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80089-2

McIntyre, 2001, Overview, history, and objectives of performance measurement, Health Care Financ Rev, 22, 7

Lawrence DM. The future of health care. Medscape Money Med 2000; 1(1). Available at: http://www.medscape.com.

Weick, 2001

Gladwell M. The picture problem. The New Yorker. November 23, 2004. Available at: http://www.newyorker.com/printables/fact/041213fa_fact.