Race, Space, and Violence: Exploring Spatial Dependence in Structural Covariates of White and Black Violent Crime in US Counties

Journal of Quantitative Criminology - Tập 28 - Trang 559-586 - 2012
Michael T. Light1, Casey T. Harris2
1Department of Sociology and Crime, Law and Justice, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA
2Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, USA

Tóm tắt

To join the literature on spatial analysis with research testing the racial invariance hypothesis by examining the extent to which claims of racial invariance are sensitive to the spatial dynamics of community structure and crime. Using 1999–2001 county-level arrest data, we employ seemingly unrelated regression models, spatial lag models, and geographically weighted regression analyses to (1) compare the extent of racial similarity/difference across these different modeling procedures, (2) evaluate the impact of spatial dependence on violent crime across racial groups, and (3) explore spatial heterogeneity in associations between macro-structural characteristics and violent crime. Results indicate that spatial processes matter, that they are more strongly associated with white than black violent crime, and that accounting for space does not significantly attenuate race-group differences in the relationship between structural characteristics (e.g., structural disadvantage) and violent crime. Additionally, we find evidence of significant variation across space in the relationships between county characteristics and white and black violent crime, suggesting that conclusions of racial invariance/variation are sensitive to where one is looking. These results are robust to different specifications of the dependent variable as well as different units of analysis. Our study suggests the racial invariance debate is not yet settled. More importantly, our study has revealed an additional level of complexity—race specific patterns of spatially heterogeneous effects—that future research on social structure and racial differences in violence should incorporate both empirically and theoretically.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht Anselin L, Cohen J, Cook D, Gorr W, Tita G (2000) Spatial analyses of crime. In: Duffee D (ed) Criminal justice 2000, vol 4: Measurement and analyses of crime and justice. National Institute of Justice, Washington Baller RD, Anselin L, Messner SF, Deane G, Hawkins DF (2001) Structural covariates of US County homicide rates: incorporating spatial effects. Criminology 39:561–590 Block CR, Block RL (1992) Homicide syndromes and vulnerability: violence in Chicago community areas over 25 years. Stud Crime Crime Prev 1:61–87 Cahill M, Mulligan G (2007) Using geographically weighted regression to explore local crime patterns. Soc Sci Comput Rev 25:174–193 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2000) National vital statistics and mortality data (Mortality Multiple Cause-of-Death Public Use Record 2000). National Center for Health Statistics, Hayattsville Clogg CC, Petkova E, Haritou A (1995) Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. Am J Sociol 100:1261–1293 Deane G, Messner SF, Stucky TD, McGeever K, Kubrin CE (2008) Not ‘islands, entire of themselves:’ exploring the spatial context of city-level robbery rates. J Quant Criminol 24:363–380 DeFronzo J, Hannon L (1998) Welfare assistance and homicide rates. Homicide Stud 2:31–45 Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M (2002) Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. Wiley, Chichester Graif C, Sampson RJ (2009) Spatial heterogeneity in the effects of immigration and diversity on neighborhood homicide rates. Homicide Stud 13:242–260 Hannon L, Knapp P, DeFina R (2005) Racial similarity in the relationship between poverty and homicide rates: comparing retransformed coefficients. Soc Sci Res 34:893–914 Harris CT, Steffensmeier D, Ulmer J, Painter-Davis N (2009) Are Blacks and Hispanics disproportionately incarcerated relative to their arrests? Racial and ethnic disproportionality between arrest and incarceration. Race Soc Probl 1:187–199 Heitgerd JL, Bursik RJ Jr (1987) Extracommunity dynamics and the ecology of delinquency. Am J Sociol 92:775–787 Hipp JR (2011) Spreading the wealth: the effect of the distribution of income and race/ethnicity across households and neighborhoods on city crime trajectories. Criminology 49:631–666 Johnston RJ, Gregory D, Hagget P, Smith D, Stoddart DR (1981) The dictionary of human geography. Blackwell, Malden Krivo L, Peterson R (1996) Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime. Soc Forces 75:619–650 Krivo L, Peterson R (2000) The structural context of homicide: accounting for racial differences in process. Am Sociol Rev 65:547–559 Krivo LJ, Peterson RD, Kuhl D (2009) Segregation, racial structure, and neighborhood violent crime. Am J Sociol 114:1765–1802 Land K, McCall P, Cohen L (1990) Structural covariates of homicide rates: are there any invariances across time and social space? Am J Sociol 95:922–963 Lane R (1986) Roots of violence in Black Philadelphia, 1860–1900. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Lobao LM, Hooks G, Tickamyer AR (eds) (2007) The sociology of spatial inequality. SUNY Press, Albany Maltz MD (1994) Deviating from the mean: the declining significance of significance. J Res Crime Delinquency 31:434–463 McNulty TL (2001) Assessing the race-violence relationship at the macro level: the assumption of racial invariance and the problem of restricted distributions. Criminology 39:467–490 Mears DP, Bhati AS (2006) No community is an island: the effects of resource deprivation on urban violence in spatially and socially proximate communities. Criminology 44:509–548 Mencken FC, Barnett C (1999) Murder, nonnegligent manslaughter, and spatial autocorrelation in mid-south counties. J Quant Criminol 15:407–422 Messner SF, Anselin L (2004) Spatial analyses of homicide with areal data. In: Goodchild MF, Janelle DG (eds) Best practices in spatially integrated social science. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 127–144 Messner SF, Anselin L, Baller RD, Hawkins DF, Deane G, Tolnay SE (1999) The spatial patterning of county homicide rates: an application of exploratory spatial data analysis. J Quant Criminol 15:423–450 Messner SF, Rosenfeld R (1999) Social structure and homicide: theory and research. In: Smith MD, Zahn M (eds) Homicide studies: a sourcebook of social research. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 27–41 Morenoff JD, Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW (2001) Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology 39:517–558 Mosher CJ, Miethe TD, Hart TC (2010) The mismeasure of crime, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks Openshaw S (1983) The modifiable areal unit problem CATMOG 38. GeoBooks, Norwich Ousey G (1999) Homicide, structural factors, and the racial invariance hypothesis. Criminology 37:405–426 Ousey G (2000) Explaining regional and urban variation in crime: a review of research. Crim Justice 1:261–308 Park R, Burgess EW, McKenzie RD (1925) The city. Chicago University Press, Chicago Parker K (2008) Unequal crime decline: theorizing race, urban inequality and criminal violence. New York University Press, New York Paternoster R, Brame R, Mazerolle P, Piquero A (1998) Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology 36:859–866 Peterson R, Krivo L (2005) Macrostructural analyses of race, ethnicity, and violent crime: recent lessons and new directions for research. Annu Rev Sociol 31:331–356 Peterson R, Krivo L (2010) Divergent social worlds: neighborhood crime and the racial-spatial divide. Russell Sage Foundation, New York Pattillo-McCoy M (1999) Black picket fences: privilege and peril among the Black middle class. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Phillips J (2002) White, Black, and Latino homicide rates: why the difference? Soc Probl 49:349–373 Reardon SF, Firebaugh G (2002) Measures of multigroup segregation. Sociol Methodol 32:33–67 Sampson R, Bean L (2006) Cultural mechanisms and killing fields: a revised theory of community-level racial inequality. In: Peterson RD, Krivo LJ, Hagan J (eds) The many colors of crime. New York University Press, New York, pp 8–36 Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD (2004) Spatial (dis)advantage and homicide in chicago neighborhoods. In: Goodchild MF, Janelle DG (eds) Spatially integrated social science. Oxford University Press, New York Sampson R, Wilson WJ (1995) Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In: Hagan J, Peterson R (eds) Crime and inequality. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 177–187 Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD, Gannon-Rowley T (2002) Assessing neighborhood effects: social processes and new directions in research. Annu Rev Sociol 28:443–478 Schwartz J (2006) Effects of diverse forms of family structure on female and male homicide. J Marriage Family 68:1291–1312 Shaw C, McKay H (1942) Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Steffensmeier D, Ulmer JT, Feldmeyer Ben, Harris CT (2010) Scope and conceptual issues in testing the race-crime invariance thesis: Black, White, and Hispanic comparisons. Criminology 48:1133–1170 Tickamyer AR, Duncan CM (1990) Poverty and opportunity structure in rural America. Annu Rev Sociol 16:67–86 Velez M (2006) Contextualizing the immigration and crime effect: an analysis of homicide in Chicago neighborhoods. Homicide Stud 13:325–335 Ward MD, Gleditsch KS (2008) Spatial regression models. Sage, Thousand Oaks