RETRACTED ARTICLE: What Are They Thinking? The Development and Use of an Instrument That Identifies Common Science Misconceptions

Journal of Science Teacher Education - Tập 18 - Trang 233-241 - 2007
Mary Stein1, Charles R. Barman2, Timothy Larrabee1
1School of Education and Human Services, Oakland University, Rochester, U.S.A.
2School of Education, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, U.S.A

Tóm tắt

This article describes the rationale for, and development of, an online instrument that helps identify commonly held science misconceptions. Science Beliefs is a 47-item instrument that targets topics in chemistry, physics, biology, earth science, and astronomy. It utilizes a true or false, along with a written-explanation, format. The true or false responses provide a cursory view of the extent to which specific beliefs are prevalent, while the accompanying explanations reveal underlying reasons for those beliefs. The stages of instrument development, reliability and validity information, along with the original sources of the items are discussed. The developed instrument has the potential to help science educators understand some specific barriers to deepening understanding across a range of science topics.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aron, R. H., Francek, M. A., Nelson, B. D., & Bisard, W. J. (1994). Atmospheric misconceptions: How they cloud our judgment. The Science Teacher, 61(1), 31–33. Barman, C., Barman, N., Cox, M., Newhouse, K., & Goldston, M. J. (2000). Students’ ideas about animals: Results from a national study. Science & Children, 38(1), 42–47. Barman, C., & Mayer, D. (1994). An analysis of high school students’ concepts and textbook presentations regarding food chains and food webs. American Biology Teacher, 56, 160–163. Barman, C., Stein, M., Barman, N., & McNair, S. (2003). Students’ ideas about plants: Results from a national study. Science & Children, 41(1), 46–51. Black, P. J., & Lucas, A. M. (Eds.). (1993). Children’s informal ideas in science. London: Routledge. Campbell, K. A., Rohlman, D. S., Storzbach, D., Binder, L. M., Anger, W. K., Kovera, C. A., Davis, K. L., & Grossmann, S. J. (1999). Test-retest reliability of psychological and neurobehavioral tests self-administered by computer. Assessment, 6(1), 21–32. Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84. Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (Eds.). (1985). Children’s ideas in science. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham, England: Open University Press. Fensham, P. J., Garrard, J., & West, L. W. (1981). The use of cognitive mapping in teaching and learning strategies. Research in Science Education, 11, 121–129. Fisher, K. M. (1983). In H. Helm & J. D. Novak (Chairs). Proceedings of the international seminar on misconceptions in science and mathematics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (Producer). (1997). Minds of our own [Video]. (Available from Annenberg/CPB Channel, 60 Garden Street, MS 82; Cambridge, MA 02138) Haslam, F., & Treagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple-choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21, 203–211. Hewson, M. G., & Hewson, P. W. (1983). Effect of instruction using students’ prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 731–743. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Odom, A. L., & Barrow, L. H. (1995). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students’ understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 45–61. Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (Eds.). (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children’s science. London: Heinemann. Peterson, R. F., Treagust, D. F., & Garnett, P. (1989). Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to evaluate grade-11 and -12 students’ concepts of covalent bonding and structure following a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 301–314. Sadler, P. M. (1987). Misconceptions in astronomy. In J. D. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the second international seminar on misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics (pp. 422–425). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. Schoon, K. J. (1995). The origin and extent of alternative conceptions in the earth and space sciences: A survey of pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 7(2), 27–46. Stein, M., & Barman, C. R. (2005, January). What are they thinking? The development and use of an instrument to identify student science misconceptions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Colorado Springs, CO. Trumper, R. (2001). A cross-age study of senior high school students’ conceptions of basic astronomy concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(1), 97–109. U.S. Geological Service. (2003). Where is Earth’s water located? Retrieved January 8, 2005, at http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/earthwherewater.html Watts, D. M., & Zylbersztajn, A. (1981). A survey of some children’s ideas about force. Physics Education, 16, 360–365. Zeilik, M., & Bisard, W. (2000, February). Conceptual change in introductory-level astronomy courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29, 229–232.