REDUCING GREENHOUSE EMISSIONS AND FUEL CONSUMPTION
Tài liệu tham khảo
WRI, 2005
IEA, 2003
WBCSD, 2004
IPCC, 2001
Lipman, 2002, Emissions of nitrous oxide and methane from conventional and alternative motor vehicles, Climatic Change, 53, 477, 10.1023/A:1015235211266
UNFCCC. Kyoto protocol. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php. (2007).
IPCC, 1990
IPCC, 1995
IPCC, 2007
HM Treasury. Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/stern_review_economics_climate_change/stern_review_report.cfm. (2006).
RGGI. Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI): An Initiative of the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic States of the U.S. http://www.rggi.org. (2007).
CARB. AB 32 Fact Sheet: California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. California Air Resources Board (CARB), Sacramento, California. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/factsheets/ab32factsheet.pdf. (2006).
Sperling, 2007
Davis, 2006
ANL, 2007
Delucchi, 2003
Savage, M. Automated Traffic Enforcement. National Convergence of State Legislatures and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. http://www.ncsl.org/programs/transportation/0700trnrv.htm. (2003).
Lynn, 1992, Automated Speed Enforcement Pilot Project for the Capital Beltway: Feasibility of Photo-Radar
Gains, 2004, The National Safety Camera Programme: Three-Year Evaluation Report
Retting, 2003, 34
FHWA, 2006
U.S. EPA, 1998
Shaheen, 1998, Identification and Prioritization of Environmentally Beneficial Intelligent Transportation Technologies
Midenet, 2004, Signalized intersection with real-time adaptive control: on-field assessment of CO2 and pollutant emission reduction, “Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment”, 9, 29, 10.1016/S1361-9209(03)00044-0
Rakha, 2000, Requirements for evaluating traffic signal control impacts on energy and emissions based on instantaneous speed and acceleration measurements, “Transportation Research Record”, 1738, 56, 10.3141/1738-07
Rakha, 2000, Traffic signal coordination across jurisdictional boundaries: field evaluation of efficiency, energy, environmental, and safety impacts, “Transportation Research Record”, 1727, 42, 10.3141/1727-06
Skabardonis, A. ITS benefits: the case of traffic signal control systems. Paper No. 013286 in Transportation Research Board 80th Annual Meeting Conference Proceedings. (2001).
Kang, 1999, Assessing the Benefits and Costs of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Ramp Meters
Meers, G. and Roth, M. Road safety and ecological sustainability working together in Australian Transport Research Forum: Zero Road Toll—A Dream or a Realistic Vision? Conference Proceedings. (2001).
Haworth, 2001, The Relationship Between Fuel Economy and Safety Outcomes
Stefan, C. Section Control: Automatic Speed Enforcement in the Kaisermühlen Tunnel. Kuratorium für Verkehrssicherheit, Vienna, Austria. http://www.kfv.at/fileadmin/Publikationen/Studien/VM/SectionControl-Kaismtunnel.pdf. (2006).
Chang, 2003
Wilbur Smith Associates, 2001
ITSA, 2002
Levinson, 2003, 1
Lehtonen, M. and Kulmala, R. Benefits of pilot implementation of public transport signal priorities and real-time passenger information. “Transportation Research Record” No.1799: pp. 18–25. (2002).
Vincent, 2006, The potential for bus rapid transit to reduce transportation-related CO2 emissions, “Journal of Public Transportation”, 9, 219, 10.5038/2375-0901.9.3.12
Maze, 1999, Oregon Green Light CVO Evaluation Final Report Detailed Test Plans 7 and 9: Simulating the Impact of Electronic Screening on Travel Time, Fuel Consumption and Weigh Station Efficiency
Bose, 2001, Analysis of Traffic Flow with Mixed Manual and Intelligent Cruise Control Vehicles: Theory and Experiments
IEA, 2001
Barth, M. An emission and energy comparison between a simulated automated highway system and current traffic conditions in 2000 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference Proceedings. (2000).
FHWA, 1998
Shaheen, 2006, 116
Shaheen, 1998, Carsharing in Europe and North America: past, present, and Future, “Transportation Quarterly”, 52, 35
Rydén, 2005, Mobility Services for Urban Sustainability
Communauto, 2007
City of Stockholm. Stockholm's Action Programme Against Greenhouse Gas Emissions. City of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden. http://www.miljo.stockholm.se/ext/klimat/pdf/Stockholm_ActionProgramme_against_Greenhouse_Gases_2002.pdf. (2002)
Mattrisch, 2002, Future aspects of sustainable urban mobility, 3
Shoup, 2005
Grant, 2001, Parking Cash Out: Implementing Commuter Benefits Under the Commuter Choice Leadership Initiative
Drumheller, 2001
Shoup, 1993, Cashing Out Employer-Paid Parking: A Precedent for Congestion Pricing?
GAO, 2001
Boghani, 1991
U.S. DOT, 1993, Transportation Implications of Telecommuting
U.S. DOE, 1994, Energy, Emissions, and Social Consequences of Telecommuting
Shafizadeh, 2007, Costs and benefits of home-based telecommuting: a monte carlo simulation model incorporating telecommuter, employer, and pubic sector perspectives, “Journal of Infrastructure System”, 13, 12, 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2007)13:1(12)
U.S. EPA, 2005
Kitou, 2003, Energy-related emissions from telework, “Environmental Science & Technology”, 16, 3467, 10.1021/es025849p
CARB, 2005
Jakowitsch, 2002, Charting a course for transportation in the new world of climate change, 87
Feigon, 2003
CNT, 2003
Parker, 2002, Statewide Transit-Oriented Development Study: Factors for Success in California
JHK and Associates, 1995
GAO, 2003
TfL, 2006
City of Stockholm. Facts and Results from the Stockholm Trials. Stockholm, Sweden. http://www.stockholmforsoket.se/upload/Sammanfattningar/English/Final%20Report_The%20Stockholm%20Trial.pdf. (2006).
