REDIS: A value-based decision support tool for renovation of building portfolios

Jensen, 2015, Value based building renovation – a tool for decision-making and evaluation, Build. Environ., 92, 1, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.04.008 Troelsgaard, 2011 Jensen, 2013, Sustainability evaluation of retrofitting and REnovation of buildings in early stages, 2013 Ferreira, 2013, Refurbishment decision support tools review—energy and life cycle as key aspects to sustainable refurbishment projects, Energy Pol., 62, 1453, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.082 Nielsen, 2016, Early stage decision support for sustainable building renovation – a review, Build. Environ., 103, 165, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.009 Thuvander, 2012, Unveiling the process of sustainable renovation, Sustainability, 4, 1188, 10.3390/su4061188 Bakht, 2015, Synthesis of decision-making research in construction, J. Construct. Eng. Manag., 141, 4015027, 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000984 Balcomb, 2001 Andresen, 2000 Blinkilde, 2011 Flourentzos, 2000, EPIQR software, Energy Build., 31, 129, 10.1016/S0378-7788(99)00026-2 Zavadskas, 2004, Multiple criteria decision support web-based system for building refurbishment, J. Civ. Eng. Manag., 10, 77, 10.1080/13923730.2004.9636289 Hansen, 2017, Gamification as a means to user involvement in decision-making processes for sustainable buildings, 2531 Näegeli, 2017, A multidimensional optimization approach to refurbishment design on a multi-building scale, 709 Kamari, 2017, Sustainability focused decision-making in building renovation, Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. in press, 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.05.001 Thuvander, 2014 WCED, 1987 Hevner, 2004, Essay in information design science systems, MIS Q., 28, 75, 10.2307/25148625 Peffers, 2007, A design science research methodology for information systems research, J. Manag. Inf. Syst., 24, 45, 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302 Beyer, 1999 Sharp, 2015 Nielsen, 2017, Decision-making in the pre-design stage of sustainable building renovation projects, 1967 Boren, 2000, Thinking aloud: reconciling theory and practice, IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., 43, 261, 10.1109/47.867942 Venable, 2014, FEDS: a framework for evaluation in design science research, Eur. J. Inf. Syst., 25, 1 Keeney, 1992 Molio, 2017 Saaty, 1980, The analytic hierarchy process, Education, 1 Medineckiene, 2015, Multi-criteria decision-making system for sustainable building assessment/certification, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng, 15, 11, 10.1016/j.acme.2014.09.001 Juan, 2006, Decision support for housing customization: a hybrid approach using case-based reasoning and genetic algorithm, Expert Syst. Appl., 31, 83, 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.010 Juan, 2009, GA-based decision support system for housing condition assessment and refurbishment strategies, Autom. ConStruct., 18, 394, 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.006 Wang, 2010, A multi-objective decision-making process for reuse selection of historic buildings, Expert Syst. Appl., 37, 1241, 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.034 Saaty, 1990, How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 48, 9, 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I Saaty, 2008, Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, Int. J. Serv. Sci., 1, 83 R.R.I. of Sweden, Renobuild, (n.d.). http://renobuild.se/skola/. Kylili, 2016, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) approach in buildings renovation for the sustainability of the built environment: a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 56, 906, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.096 Jensen, 2015 Kommune, 2015 Miller, 1956, The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on processing information, Psychol. Rev., 63, 81, 10.1037/h0043158 Gade, 2017 Mjörnell, 2014, A tool to evaluate different renovation alternatives with regard to sustainability, Sustain. Times, 6, 4227, 10.3390/su6074227