R2C3, Một Người Bạn Robot Hỗ Trợ Phục Hồi Cho Trẻ Em và Người Chăm Sóc: Thiết Kế Hợp Tác Của Một Robot Xã Hội Dành Cho Trẻ Em Bị Rối Loạn Phát Triển Thần Kinh

American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Publication Anderson T, Shattuck J (2012) Design-based research: a decade of progress in education research? Educ Res 41(1):16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813 Anzalone SM, Xavier J, Boucenna S, Billeci L, Narzisi A, Muratori F, Cohen D, Chetouani M (2019) Quantifying patterns of joint attention during human-robot interactions: An application for autism spectrum disorder assessment. Pattern Recognit Lett 118:42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2018.03.007 Asselborn T, Gargot T, Kidziński Ł, Johal W, Cohen D, Jolly C, Dillenbourg P (2018) Automated human-level diagnosis of dysgraphia using a consumer tablet. Npj Digital Med 1(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0049-x Bangor A (2009) Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J Usab Stud 4(3):10 Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT (2008) An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int J Hum Comput Interact 24(6):574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776 Barab S (2005) Design-based research: a methodological toolkit for the learning scientist. In: Sawyer RK (Ed.) The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 153–170 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.011 Bartneck C, Belpaeme T, Eyssel F, Kanda T, Keijsers M, Šabanović S (2020) Human-robot interaction: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108676649 Bartneck C, Kulić D, Croft E, Zoghbi S (2009) Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int J Soc Robot 1(1):71–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3 Belpaeme T, Kennedy J, Ramachandran A, Scassellati B, Tanaka F (2018) Social robots for education: a review. Sci Robot 3(21):5954. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954 Biotteau M, Danna J, Baudou É, Puyjarinet F, Velay J-L, Albaret J-M, Chaix Y (2019) Developmental coordination disorder and dysgraphia: signs and symptoms, diagnosis, and rehabilitation. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 15:1873–1885. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S120514 Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Brooke J (1995) SUS—a quick and dirty usability scale. In Usability evaluation in industry, Taylor and Francis, London, pp 8–16 Brooke J (2013) SUS: a retrospective. J Usab Stud 8(2):29–40 Carberry AR (2012) A review of learning-by-teaching for engineering educators. Adv Eng Educ 3(2):1–17 Christensen K, West RE (2017) The development of design-based research. In: Foundations of learning and instructional design technology (Pressbooks). Pressbooks. https://lidtfoundations.pressbooks.com/chapter/design-based-research/ Chung PJ, Patel DR, Nizami I (2020) Disorder of written expression and dysgraphia: definition, diagnosis, and management. Transl Pediatr 9((Suppl 1)):S46–S54. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp.2019.11.01 Cifuentes CA, Pinto MJ, Céspedes N, Múnera M (2020) Social robots in therapy and care. Curr Robot Rep 1(3):59–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-020-00009-2 Cohen D, Anzalone S, Chetouani M (2022) Intelligence artificielle: quelles applications pour la psychopathologie du développement ? Neuropsychiatrie de l’Enfance et de l’Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurenf.2022.03.003 Dillenbourg P, Jermann P (2010) Technology for classroom orchestration. New science of learning: cognition, computers and collaboration in education, pp 525–552 Eeckhout C, Francaux M, Philippot P (2012) Auto-efficacité perçue pour la pratique d’une activité physique: Adaptation et validation francophone du Exercise Confidence Survey. Can J Behav Sci 44(1):77–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025317 Elbeleidy S, Rosen D, Liu D, Shick A, Williams T (2021) Analyzing teleoperation interface usage of robots in therapy for children with autism Elbeleidy S, Shick A, Williams T (2021) Teleoperation interface usage in robot-assisted childhood ASD therapy, pp 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434074.3447151 Gargot T, Asselborn T, Zammouri I, Brunelle J, Johal W, Dillenbourg P, Archambault D, Chetouani M, Cohen D, Anzalone SM (2021) “It is not the robot who learns, it is me”; Treating severe dysgraphia using Child-Robot Interaction. Front Psychiatr. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.596055 Gelsomini M, Degiorgi M, Garzotto F, Leonardi G, Penati S, Ramuzat N, Silvestri J, Clasadonte F (2017) Designing a robot companion for children with neuro-developmental disorders. IDC. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3084308 Gronier G, Baudet A (2021) Psychometric evaluation of the F-SUS: creation and validation of the French version of the system usability scale. Int J Hum-Comput Interact. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1898828 Grossard C, Palestra G, Xavier J, Chetouani M, Grynszpan O, Cohen D (2018) ICT and autism care: state of the art. Curr Opin Psychiatry 31(6):474–483. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000455 Guha ML, Druin A, Fails JA (2013) Cooperative Inquiry revisited: reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design. Int J Child-Compu Interact 1(1):14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.003 Hamstra-Bletz L, de Bie J, den Brinker B (1987) Concise evaluation scale for children's handwriting. Lisse Swets 1 Zeitlinger Hassenzahl M (2006) Hedonic, emotional, and experiential perspectives on product quality [Chapter]. Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction; IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-562-7.ch042 Hood D, Lemaignan S, Dillenbourg P (2015) The CoWriter project: teaching a robot how to write. In: Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction extended abstracts, https://doi.org/10.1145/2701973.2702091 Hood D, Lemaignan S, Dillenbourg P (2015) When children teach a robot to write: an autonomous teachable humanoid which uses simulated handwriting. In: Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696479 Jamet F, Masson O, Jacquet B, Stilgenbauer J-L, Baratgin J (2018) Learning by teaching with humanoid robot: a new powerful experimental tool to improve children’s learning ability. J Robot 2018:1–11 Johal W (2020) Research trends in social robots for learning. Curr Robot Rep 1:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-020-00008-3 Johnson WL, Lester JC (2016) Face-to-face interaction with pedagogical agents, twenty years later. Int J Artif Intell Educ 26(1):25–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0065-9 Kim Y, Baylor AL (2006) A social-cognitive framework for pedagogical agents as learning companions. Educ Tech Res Dev 54(6):569–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-0637-3 Konijn EA, Smakman M, van den Berghe R (2020) Use of robots in education. In: The international encyclopedia of media psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Hoboken pp 1–8 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0318 Lallemand C, Gronier G (2018) Méthodes de design UX (Eyrolles). https://www.eyrolles.com/Informatique/Livre/methodes-de-design-ux-9782212673982 Lallemand C, Koenig V, Gronier G, Martin R (2015) Création et validation d’une version française du questionnaire AttrakDiff pour l’évaluation de l’expérience utilisateur des systèmes interactifs. Eur Rev Appl Psychol 65(5):239–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2015.08.002 Lemaignan S, Jacq A, Hood D, Garcia F, Paiva A, Dillenbourg P (2016) Learning by teaching a robot: the case of handwriting. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 23(2):56–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2016.2546700 Nasir J, Bruno B, Chetouani M, Dillenbourg P (2021) What if social robots look for productive engagement? Int J Soc Robot. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00766-w Nasir J, Norman U, Bruno B, Dillenbourg P (2020) When positive perception of the robot has no effect on learning. In: 2020 29th IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), pp 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223343 Nielsen J (2005) Ten usability heuristics. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5f03/b251093aee730ab9772db2e1a8a7eb8522cb.pdf Papakostas GA, Sidiropoulos GK, Papadopoulou CI, Vrochidou E, Kaburlasos VG, Papadopoulou MT, Holeva V, Nikopoulou V-A, Dalivigkas N (2021) Social robots in special education: a systematic review. Electronics. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10121398 Parameswaran UD, Ozawa-Kirk JL, Latendresse G (2020) To live (code) or to not: a new method for coding in qualitative research. Qual Soc Work 19(4):630–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325019840394 Pivetti M, Di Battista S, Agatolio F, Simaku B, Moro M, Menegatti E (2020) Educational robotics for children with neurodevelopmental disorders: a systematic review. Heliyon 6(10):e05160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05160 Ridley E, Riby DM, Leekam SR (2020) A cross-syndrome approach to the social phenotype of neurodevelopmental disorders: Focusing on social vulnerability and social interaction style. Res Dev Disabil 100:103604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103604 Riek L (2012) Wizard of Oz studies in HRI: a systematic review and new reporting guidelines. J Human-Robot Interact. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Riek Roscoe RD, Chi MT (2008) Tutor learning: the role of explaining and responding to questions. Instr Sci 36:321–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9034-5 Saleh MA, Hanapiah FA, Hashim H (2021) Robot applications for autism: a comprehensive review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 16(6):580–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1685016 Steinfeld A, Jenkins OC, Scassellati B (2009) The oz of wizard: simulating the human for interaction research. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human robot interaction, pp 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/1514095.1514115 Tschacher W, Junghan UM, Pfammatter M (2014) Towards a taxonomy of common factors in psychotherapy—results of an expert survey. Clin Psychol Psychother 21(1):82–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1822 Valentine AZ, Brown BJ, Groom MJ, Young E, Hollis C, Hall CL (2020) A systematic review evaluating the implementation of technologies to assess, monitor and treat neurodevelopmental disorders: a map of the current evidence. Clin Psychol Rev 80:101870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101870 Zou J, Gauthier S, Anzalone S, Cohen D, Archambault D (2022) A wizard of oz interface with qtrobot for facilitating the handwriting learning in children with dysgraphia and its usability evaluation, pp 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08645-8_26 Zubrycki I, Granosik G (2016) Understanding therapists’ needs and attitudes towards robotic support. The roboterapia project. Int J Soc Robot 8(4):553–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0372-9