Questions of Evidence in Evidence-Based Policy

Axiomathes - 2009
Eleonora Montuschi1
1Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Cabinet Office (1999) Modernising government, white paper Cm 4310, HMSO

Campbell Collaboration. http://www.campbellcollaboration.org

Cartwright N (1999) The vanity of rigour in economics. Discussion paper series, CPNSS. Expanded version in P. Fontaine and R. Leonard (eds) (2005) The experiment in the history of economics. Routledge, London-New York, pp 135–153

Cartwright N (2007a) Are RCTs the gold standard? BioSocieties 2(2):11–20

Cartwright N (2007b) Evidence based policy and its ranking schemes: so, where’s ethnography? (mimeo)

Cartwright N et al (2007) Evidence-based policy: where is our theory of evidence? CPNSS/Contingency and Dissent DP, London. Also published in Beckermann A, Tetens H, Walter S (eds) (2008) Philosophy: foundations and applications. Main lectures and colloquia talks of the German analytic philosophy conference GAP. 6. Mentis-Verlag, Paderborn

Cochrane Collaboration. http://www.cochrane.org

Commission of the European Communities (2001) European governance: a white paper. Commission of the European communities: Brussels. COM

Daston L, Galison P (1992) The image of objectivity. Representation 40:135–156

Daston L, Galison P (2007) Objectivity. Zone Books, New York

Dawid AP (2008) Statistics and the law. In: Bell A, Swenson J, Tybjerg W-K (eds) Evidence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 119–148

Dehue T (2002) A Dutch treat. Randomized controlled experimentation and the case of heroin-maintenance in the Netherlands. Hist Human Sci 15:2

Gigerenzer G (2002) Reckoning with risk. Penguin Press, London

Gigerenzer G et al (1989) Empire of chance: how probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Haack S (ed) (2003) Clues to the puzzle of scientific evidence: a more-so story. In: Defending science—within reason. Prometheus Books, New York

Hacking I (1975) The emergence of probability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Hunter DJ (2003) Evidence-based policy and practice: riding for a fall? J R Soc Med 96(4):194–196

Jefferson T (2003) Unintended events following immunization with MMR: a systematic review. Vaccine 21:3954–3960

Lynch M, McNally R (2003) Science, “common sense”, and DNA evidence: a legal controversy about the public understanding of science. Public Underst Sci 12:83–103

Martin E (2006) Evidence, objectivity and public policy: methodological perspectives on the vaccine controversy. APA Proc Address 81(3) (mimeo)

Mayo D (1988) Towards a more objective understanding of carcinogenic risk. PSA Proc 2:489–503

Montuschi E (2003) The objects of social science. Continuum Press, London/New York

SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network) (2004). http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/50/compevidence.html

Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence (2007). http://www.cebm.jr2.ox.ac.uk/docs/level.html

Porter T (1995) Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press, Princeton

Scientific advice, risk and evidence: how government handles them (2006) Evidence Report 15 Feb 2006. http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/science_and_technology_committee/sag.cfm

Seckinelgin H (2007) Evidence based policy for HIV/AIDS interventions: questions of external validity, or relevance for use. Dev Change 38(6):1219–1234

Suter G (1993) Ecological risk assesment. Lewis Publ, Chelsea

Wakefield A et al (1998) Ideal lymphoid-nodular hyper-plasia, non specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet 351:637–642