Questions of Evidence in Evidence-Based Policy
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Cabinet Office (1999) Modernising government, white paper Cm 4310, HMSO
Campbell Collaboration. http://www.campbellcollaboration.org
Cartwright N (1999) The vanity of rigour in economics. Discussion paper series, CPNSS. Expanded version in P. Fontaine and R. Leonard (eds) (2005) The experiment in the history of economics. Routledge, London-New York, pp 135–153
Cartwright N (2007b) Evidence based policy and its ranking schemes: so, where’s ethnography? (mimeo)
Cartwright N et al (2007) Evidence-based policy: where is our theory of evidence? CPNSS/Contingency and Dissent DP, London. Also published in Beckermann A, Tetens H, Walter S (eds) (2008) Philosophy: foundations and applications. Main lectures and colloquia talks of the German analytic philosophy conference GAP. 6. Mentis-Verlag, Paderborn
Cochrane Collaboration. http://www.cochrane.org
Commission of the European Communities (2001) European governance: a white paper. Commission of the European communities: Brussels. COM
Daston L, Galison P (1992) The image of objectivity. Representation 40:135–156
Daston L, Galison P (2007) Objectivity. Zone Books, New York
Dawid AP (2008) Statistics and the law. In: Bell A, Swenson J, Tybjerg W-K (eds) Evidence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 119–148
Dehue T (2002) A Dutch treat. Randomized controlled experimentation and the case of heroin-maintenance in the Netherlands. Hist Human Sci 15:2
Gigerenzer G (2002) Reckoning with risk. Penguin Press, London
Gigerenzer G et al (1989) Empire of chance: how probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Haack S (ed) (2003) Clues to the puzzle of scientific evidence: a more-so story. In: Defending science—within reason. Prometheus Books, New York
Hacking I (1975) The emergence of probability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jefferson T (2003) Unintended events following immunization with MMR: a systematic review. Vaccine 21:3954–3960
Lynch M, McNally R (2003) Science, “common sense”, and DNA evidence: a legal controversy about the public understanding of science. Public Underst Sci 12:83–103
Martin E (2006) Evidence, objectivity and public policy: methodological perspectives on the vaccine controversy. APA Proc Address 81(3) (mimeo)
Mayo D (1988) Towards a more objective understanding of carcinogenic risk. PSA Proc 2:489–503
Montuschi E (2003) The objects of social science. Continuum Press, London/New York
SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network) (2004). http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/50/compevidence.html
Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence (2007). http://www.cebm.jr2.ox.ac.uk/docs/level.html
Porter T (1995) Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Scientific advice, risk and evidence: how government handles them (2006) Evidence Report 15 Feb 2006. http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/science_and_technology_committee/sag.cfm
Seckinelgin H (2007) Evidence based policy for HIV/AIDS interventions: questions of external validity, or relevance for use. Dev Change 38(6):1219–1234
Suter G (1993) Ecological risk assesment. Lewis Publ, Chelsea