Quantitative flow ratio to predict long-term coronary artery bypass graft patency in patients with left main coronary artery disease
Tóm tắt
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been demonstrated in some studies to predict long-term coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is an emerging technology which may predict FFR. In this study, we hypothesised that QFR would predict long-term CABG patency and that QFR would offer superior diagnostic performance to quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). A prospective study was performed on patients with left main coronary artery disease who were undergoing CABG. QFR, QCA and IVUS assessment was performed. Follow-up computed tomography coronary angiography and invasive coronary angiography was undertaken to assess graft patency. A total of 22 patients, comprising of 65 vessels were included in the analysis. At a median follow-up of 3.6 years post CABG (interquartile range, 2.3 to 4.8 years), 12 grafts (18.4%) were occluded. QFR was not statistically significantly higher in occluded grafts (0.81 ± 0.19 vs. 0.69 ± 0.21; P = 0.08). QFR demonstrated a discriminatory power to predict graft occlusion (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.88; P = 0.03). At long-term follow-up, the risk of graft occlusion was higher in vessels with a QFR > 0.80 (58.6% vs. 17.0%; hazard ratio, 3.89; 95% CI, 1.05 to 14.42; P = 0.03 by log-rank test). QCA (minimum lumen diameter, lesion length, diameter stenosis) and IVUS (minimum lumen area, minimum lumen diameter, diameter stenosis) parameters were not predictive of long-term graft patency. QFR may predict long-term graft patency in patients undergoing CABG.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Fournier S, Toth GG, De Bruyne B, Johnson NP, Ciccarelli G, Xaplanteris P et al (2018) Six-year follow-up of fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 11(6):e006368. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.117.006368
Glineur D, Grau JB, Etienne PY, Benedetto U, Fortier JH, Papadatos S et al (2019) Impact of preoperative fractional flow reserve on arterial bypass graft anastomotic function: the IMPAG trial. Eur Heart J 40(29):2421–2428. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz329
Westra J, Tu S (2020) Overview of quantitative flow ratio and optical flow ratio in the assessment of intermediate coronary lesions. US Cardiol Rev 14:e09
Zhang R, Song C, Guan C, Liu Q, Wang C, Xie L et al (2020) Prognostic value of quantitative flow ratio based functional SYNTAX score in patients with left main or multivessel coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 13(10):e009155. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.120.009155
Mehta OH, Hay M, Lim RY, Ihdayhid AR, Michail M, Zhang JM et al (2020) Comparison of diagnostic performance between quantitative flow ratio, non-hyperemic pressure indices and fractional flow reserve. Cardiovasc Diagn Therapy 10(3):442–452
Nashef SA, Roques F, Sharples LD, Nilsson J, Smith C, Goldstone AR, et al. (2012) EuroSCORE II. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 41(4):734–744; discussion 44–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezs043
Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’t Veer M et al (2009) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360(3):213–224. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0807611
De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z et al (2012) Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 367(11):991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1205361
Xaplanteris P, Fournier S, Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF, Barbato E, Tonino PAL et al (2018) Five-year outcomes with PCI guided by fractional flow reserve. N Engl J Med 379(3):250–259. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1803538
Botman CJ, Schonberger J, Koolen S, Penn O, Botman H, Dib N et al (2007) Does stenosis severity of native vessels influence bypass graft patency? A prospective fractional flow reserve-guided study. Ann Thorac Surg 83(6):2093–2097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.01.027
Thuesen AL, Riber LP, Veien KT, Christiansen EH, Jensen SE, Modrau I et al (2018) Fractional flow reserve versus angiographically-guided coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol 72(22):2732–2743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.043
Toth GG, De Bruyne B, Kala P, Ribichini FL, Casselman F, Ramos R et al (2019) Graft patency after FFR-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass grafting: the GRAFFITI trial. EuroIntervention 15(11):e999–e1005. https://doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-19-00463
Toth GG, Collet C, Langhoff Thuesen A, Mizukami T, Casselman F, Riber LP et al (2021) Influence of fractional flow reserve on grafts patency: systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29864
Thuesen AL, Riber LP, Veien KT, Christiansen EH, Jensen SE, Modrau I et al (2021) Health-related quality of life and angina in fractional flow reserve-versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass grafting: FARGO Trial (fractional flow reserve versus angiography randomization for graft optimization). Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 14(6):e007302. https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.120.007302
Toth G, De Bruyne B, Casselman F, De Vroey F, Pyxaras S, Di Serafino L et al (2013) Fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 128(13):1405–1411. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.113.002740
Yong AS, Daniels D, De Bruyne B, Kim HS, Ikeno F, Lyons J et al (2013) Fractional flow reserve assessment of left main stenosis in the presence of downstream coronary stenoses. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 6(2):161–165. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.112.000104
Hamilos M, Muller O, Cuisset T, Ntalianis A, Chlouverakis G, Sarno G et al (2009) Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation 120(15):1505–1512. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.109.850073
Fassa AA, Wagatsuma K, Higano ST, Mathew V, Barsness GW, Lennon RJ et al (2005) Intravascular ultrasound-guided treatment for angiographically indeterminate left main coronary artery disease: a long-term follow-up study. J Am Coll Cardiol 45(2):204–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.066
de la Torre Hernandez JM, Hernández Hernandez F, Alfonso F, Rumoroso JR, Lopez-Palop R, Sadaba M et al (2011) Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions results from the multicenter LITRO study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(4):351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.064
Park SJ, Ahn JM, Kang SJ, Yoon SH, Koo BK, Lee JY et al (2014) Intravascular ultrasound-derived minimal lumen area criteria for functionally significant left main coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7(8):868–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.015
Thuijs D, Kappetein AP, Serruys PW, Mohr FW, Morice MC, Mack MJ et al (2019) Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial. Lancet (Lond, Engl) 394(10206):1325–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31997-x
Escaned J, Collet C, Ryan N, De Maria GL, Walsh S, Sabate M et al (2017) Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three vessel disease: 1-year results of the SYNTAX II study. Eur Heart J 38(42):3124–3134. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx512
Asano T, Katagiri Y, Chang CC, Kogame N, Chichareon P, Takahashi K et al (2019) Angiography-derived fractional flow reserve in the SYNTAX II trial: feasibility, diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio, and clinical prognostic value of functional SYNTAX score derived from quantitative flow ratio in patients with 3-vessel disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 12(3):259–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.023
Fearon WF, Zimmermann FM, De Bruyne B, Piroth Z, van Straten AHM, Szekely L et al (2021) Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI as compared with coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2112299
Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sedrakyan A, Puskas JD et al (2018) Radial-artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 378(22):2069–2077. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716026
Westra J, Tu S, Campo G, Qiao S, Matsuo H, Qu X et al (2019) Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio in prospectively enrolled patients: an individual patient-data meta-analysis. Catheteriz Cardiovasc Intervent 94(5):693–701. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28283
Masdjedi K, Tanaka N, Van Belle E, Porouchani S, Linke A, Woitek FJ et al (2021) Vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) for the assessment of stenosis severity: the FAST II study. EuroIntervention. https://doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-21-00471
Gigante C, Mizukami T, Sonck J, Nagumo S, Tanzilli A, Bartunek J et al (2020) Graft patency and progression of coronary artery disease after CABG assessed by angiography-derived fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiol 316:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.04.083
Xu B, Tu S, Song L, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G et al (2021) Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet (Lond, Engl) 398(10317):2149–2159. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02248-0
Chan M, Ridley L, Dunn DJ, Tian DH, Liou K, Ozdirik J et al (2016) A systematic review and meta-analysis of multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts. Int J Cardiol 221:898–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.264
Gaudino M, Antoniades C, Benedetto U, Deb S, Di Franco A, Di Giammarco G et al (2017) Mechanisms, consequences, and prevention of coronary graft failure. Circulation 136(18):1749–1764. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.117.027597