Quantitative comparison of thermal and solutal transport in a T-mixer by FLIM and CFD

Microfluidics and Nanofluidics - Tập 5 - Trang 603-617 - 2008
David-A. Mendels1, Emmelyn M. Graham2,3, Steven W. Magennis2, Anita C. Jones2, François Mendels4
1National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
2Collaborative Optical Spectroscopy, Micromanipulation and Imaging Centre (COSMIC) and the School of Chemistry, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
3TUV NEL, Glasgow, UK
4Cognoscens, Lyon, France

Tóm tắt

The development and adoption of lab-on-a-chip and micro-TAS (total analysis system) techniques requires not only the solving of design and manufacturing issues, but also the introduction of reliable and quantitative methods of analysis. In this work, two complementary tools are applied to the study of thermal and solutal transport in liquids. The experimental determination of the concentration of water in a water–methanol mixture and of the temperature of water in a microfluidic T-mixer are achieved by means of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). The results are compared to those of finite volume simulations based on tabulated properties and well-established correlations for the fluid properties. The good correlation between experimental and modelled results demonstrate without ambiguity that (1) the T-mixer is an adiabatic system within the conditions, fluids and flow rates used in this study, (2) buoyancy effects influence the mixing of liquids of different densities at moderate flow rates (Reynolds number Re ≪ 10−2), and (3) the combination of FLIM and computational fluid dynamics has the potential to be used to measure the thermal and solutal diffusion coefficients of fluids for a range of temperatures and concentrations in one single experiment. As such, it represents a first step towards the full-field monitoring of both the extent and the kinetics of a chemical reaction.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abrarall P, Gué AM (2007) Lab-on-chip technologies: making a microfluidic network and coupling it into a complete microsystem—a review. J Micromech Microeng 17:R15–R49 Bennett J, Wiggins C (2003) A computational study of mixing microchannel flows. http://arxivorg/ftp/cond-mat/papers/0307/0307482pdf Benninger R, Koc Y, Hofmann O, Requejo-Isidro J, Neil M, French P, deMello A (2006) Quantitative 3-D mapping of fluidic temperatures within microchannel networks using fluorescence lifetime imaging. Anal Chem 78:2272–2278 Black M, Sapiro G, Marimont D, Heeger D (1998) Robust anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Image Process 7:421–432 Casey K, Quitevis E (1988) Effect of solvent polarity on non-radiative processes in xanthene dyes: rhodamine B in normal alcohols. J Phys Chem 92:6590–6594 Crank J (1975) The mathematics of diffusion, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford Dougan L, Crain J, Vass H, Magennis S (2004) Probing the liquid-state structure and dynamics of aqueous solutions by fluorescence spectroscopy. J Fluoresc 14:91 Erickson D (2005) Towards numerical prototyping of labs-onchip: modelling for integrated microfluidic devices. Microfluid Nanofluid 1:301–318 Howell PJ, Mott D, Fertig S, Kaplan C, Golden J, Oran E, Ligler F (2005) A microfluidic mixer with grooves placed on the top and bottom of the channel. Lab Chip 5:524–530 Langhaar H (1942) Steady flow in the transition length of a straight tube. J Appl Mech 9:A55–58 Lemmon E, McLinden M, Friend D (2005) Thermophysical properties of fluid systems. In: Linstrom PJ, Mallard WG (eds) NIST chemistry WebBook, NIST standard reference database number 69. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, p 20899 Lide DR (ed) (2007) Properties of water in the range 0–100°C. In: CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, Internet Version 2007, 87th edn. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL Liu Y, Kim B, Sung H (2004) Two-fluid mixing in a microchannel. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 25:986–995 Magennis S, Graham E, Jones AC (2005) Quantitative spatial mapping of mixing in microfluidic systems. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:2–6 Nguyen NT, Wu Z (2005) Micromixers—a review. J Micromech Microeng 15:R1–R16 Ottino J, Wiggins S (2004) Introduction: mixing in microfluidics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 362:923–935 Perona P, Malik J (1990) Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 7:629–639 Receveur R, Lindermans F, de Rooij N (2007) Microsystems technologies for implantable applications. J Micromech Microeng 17:R50–R80 Soille P (1999) Morphological image analysis: principles and applications. Springer, Berlin Stroock A, Dertinger S, Ajdari A, Mezic I, Stone H, Whitesides G (2002a) Chaotic mixer for microchannels. Sci Mag 295:647–651 Stroock A, Dertinger S, Whitesides G, Ajdari A (2002b) Patterning flows using grooved surfaces. Anal Chem 74:5306–5312 Tadmor Z, Gogos C (1979) Principles of polymer processing. Wiley, New York Wiggins S, Ottino J (2004) Foundations of chaotic mixing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 362:937–970 Woolf L (1985) Insights into solute-solute-solvent interactions from transport property measurements with particular reference to methanol-water mixtures and their constituents. Pure Appl Chem 57:1083–1090 Wu Z, Nguyen NT, Huang X (2004) Non-linear diffusive mixing in microchannels: theory and experiments. J Micromech Microeng 14:604–611 Yamaguchi Y, Honda T, Briones M, Yamashita K, Miyazaki M, Nakamura H, Maeda H (2006) Influence of gravity on a laminar flow in a microbioanalysis system. Meas Sci Technol 17:3162–3166 Yoon S, Mitchell M, Choban E, Kenis P (2005) Gravity induced reorientation of the interface between two liquids of different densities flowing larminarly through a microchannel. Lab Chip 5:1259–1263 You YL, Xu W, Tannenbaum A, Kaveh M (1996) Behavioral analysis of anistropic diffusion in image processing. IEEE Trans Image Process 4:1539–1553