Quantitative ASIL Estimation Using Fuzzy Set Theory

Sung min Kim1, Gyeong-hun Do2, Junkeon Ahn3, Kim June Young4
1Department of Information and Industrial Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
2Department of Convergence Standard, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea
3Plant Engineering Center, Institute for Advanced Engineering (IAE), Yongin, Korea
4Industrial Convergence Technology Center, Korea Testing Laboratory, Seoul, Korea

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahn, J. and Chang, D. (2016). Fuzzy-based HAZOP Study for process industry. J. Hazardous Materials, 317, 303–311.

Barbara, J. and Runyon, M. (2014). A scenario-based approach to assess exposure for ASIL determination. SAE Technical Paper No. 2014-01-0211.

Daziano, R. A., Sarrias, M. and Leard, B. (2017). Are consumers willing to pay to let cars drive for them? Analyzing response to autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 78, 150–164.

Deb, S., Strawderman, L., Carruth, D. W., DuBien, J., Smith, B. and Garrison, T. M. (2017). Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess pedestrian receptivity toward fully autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 84, 178–195.

Department of Defense, U.S. (2012). MIL-STD-882E-System Safety Program Requirements. US DoD.

Fagnant, D. J. and Kockelman, K. (2014). The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technology, 40, 1–13.

Fagnant, D. J. and Kockelman, K. (2015). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 167–181.

Hasegawa, M. and Kaneko, T. (2017). Detailed study of hazard analysis and risk assessment of ISO 26262 for motorcycles. SAE Paper No. 2017-32-0083.

International Electrotechnical Commission (2010). IEC 61508-5:2010 Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems — Part 5: Examples of methods for the determination of safety integrity level.

International Organization for Standardization (2018). ISO 26262:2018 Road vehicles — Functional safety.

Lee, K. J., Ki, Y. H., Cheon, J. S., Hwang, G. and Ahn, H. S. (2014). Approach to functional safety-compliant ecu design for electro-mechanical brake systems, Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 2, 325–332.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2013). Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicles. Washington, DC, 1–14.

Wadud, Z., MacKenzie, D. and Leiby, P. (2016). Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 86, 1–18.

Young, A. and Walker, A. (2017). Improvements in functional safety of automotive IP through ISO 26262:2018 Part 11. European Conf. Software Process Improvement, 748, 547–556. Springer, Cham.