Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature
Tóm tắt
We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11 944 climate abstracts from 1991–2011 matching the topics ‘global climate change’ or ‘global warming’. We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming. Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming. In a second phase of this study, we invited authors to rate their own papers. Compared to abstract ratings, a smaller percentage of self-rated papers expressed no position on AGW (35.5%). Among self-rated papers expressing a position on AGW, 97.2% endorsed the consensus. For both abstract ratings and authors’ self-ratings, the percentage of endorsements among papers expressing a position on AGW marginally increased over time. Our analysis indicates that the number of papers rejecting the consensus on AGW is a vanishingly small proportion of the published research.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allègre, 2012, No need to panic about global warming, Wall Street Journal
Anderegg, 2010, Expert credibility in climate change, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 12107, 10.1073/pnas.1003187107
Boykoff, 2007, Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006, Area, 39, 470, 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00769.x
Boykoff, 2004, Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press, Glob. Environ. Change, 14, 125, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001
Boykoff, 2008, ‘Ye Olde Hot Aire’: reporting on human contributions to climate change in the UK tabloid press, Environ. Res. Lett., 3, 10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/024002
Bray, 2010, The scientific consensus of climate change revisited, Environ. Sci. Policy, 13, 340, 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.04.001
Brysse, 2012, Climate change prediction: erring on the side of least drama?, Glob. Environ. Change, 23, 327, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.008
Ding, 2011, Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement, Nature Clim. Change, 1, 462, 10.1038/nclimate1295
Doran, 2009, Examining the scientific consensus on climate change, EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 90, 22, 10.1029/2009EO030002
Hansen, 2007, Scientific reticence and sea level rise, Environ. Res. Lett., 2, 10.1088/1748-9326/2/2/024002
Houghton, 2001
Houghton, 1996
Leiserowitz, 2012, Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in September 2012
Lewandowsky, 2012, The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science, Nature Clim. Change, 3, 399, 10.1038/nclimate1720
Nisbet, 2007, The polls—trends—twenty years of public opinion about global warming, Public Opin. Q., 71, 444, 10.1093/poq/nfm031
Oddie, 2012, Is the ‘anthropogenic global warming’ consensus on the point of collapse? If so, this is just the right time for Chris Huhne to leave the Government
Oreskes, 2004, Beyond the ivory tower. The scientific consensus on climate change, Science, 306, 1686, 10.1126/science.1103618
Oreskes, 2007, The scientific consensus on climate change: how do we know we’re not wrong?
Oreskes, 2010, My facts are better than your facts: spreading good news about global warming, 135
Pew, 2012
Schulte, 2008, Scientific consensus on climate change?, Energy Environ., 19, 281, 10.1260/095830508783900744
Shwed, 2010, The temporal structure of scientific consensus formation, Am. Sociol. Rev., 75, 817, 10.1177/0003122410388488
Solomon, 2007