Quantifying observer heterogeneity in bird counts

Wiley - Tập 24 Số 3 - Trang 270-277 - 1999
Ross B. Cunningham1, David B. Lindenmayer2, H. A. Nix3, Bruce D. Lindenmayer4
1Statistical Consulting Unit of The Graduate School,,
2Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies and Department of Geography,,
3Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200,,
417 Monkman Street, Chapman, ACT 2611, Australia

Tóm tắt

An essential pilot study was designed to quantify observer heterogeneity and to compare observation methods for the detectability of forest birds in stands of Eucalyptus and Pinus radiata forest as a basis for a major research project on habitat fragmentation near Tumut, southern New South Wales. Twelve experienced observers participated in the investigation. Point interval counts, zig‐zag walks and strip transects were used to count birds in both eucalypt and pine forests. The 65 species of birds recorded in the study were assigned to one of nine groups classified by a set of attributes that characterized bird detection by field observers (e.g. body size, colour and calling patterns). Observer heterogeneity varied between groups of birds and was most apparent for small birds foraging in low shrubs (species such as the white‐browed scrub wren, assigned to group 2), frequent calling, active birds (species such as the golden whistler, assigned to group 7), and midstorey, undercanopy foragers with distinctive behaviour (species such as the grey fantail assigned to group 4). For bird groups 2, 4 and 7, additional variability due to observer differences resulted in an average increase of ~ 40% in the width of a 95% confidence interval for the logarithm of bird abundance generated from a 20 minute count. Our analysis shows that taking the average of counts obtained by two or more observers would negate the increase in variance of counts due to observer heterogeneity. Few differences between methods of field observation were found. However, for frequent calling, active birds (group 7) there was evidence that more birds were heard using the point interval count method. Our study clearly demonstrated a need to either control for observer differences or to assign at least two observers to individual sites when designing bird surveys for comparative studies. Failure to do so will result in a decrease in precision of bird counts.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bell H. L., 1985, The reliability of estimates of density from transect counts., Corella, 24, 9

BlakersM. DaviesS. J.&ReillyP. N.(1984)The Atlas of Australian Birds. Royal Australasian Ornithithological Union. Melbourne University Press Melbourne.

CochranW. G.&CoxG. M.(1956)Experimental Designs.John Wiley and Sons New York.

DaviesS. J.(1984)Methods of Censusing Birds in Australia.Proceedings of a symposium organised by the Zoology section of the ANZAAS and the Western Australian Group of the Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union. Department of Conservation and Environment Perth.

Er K., 1995, Importance of sampling duration and strip width in the use of fixed‐width strip transect method for estimation of bird abundance and species diversity., Corella, 24, 109

10.2307/2265650

Kavanagh R., 1983, Effects of observer variability on the census of birds., Corella, 24, 93

LindenmayerD. B. CunninghamR. B. PopeM.&DonnellyC. F.(1999) The Tumut fragmentation experiment in south‐eastern Australia: the effects of landscape context and fragmentation of arboreal marsupials.Ecol. Applic.in press.

10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2632:NATTAO]2.0.CO;2

Loyn R. H., 1980, Bird populations in a mixed eucalypt forest used for production of wood in Gippsland, Victoria., Emu, 24, 213

10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2635:NATTAO]2.0.CO;2

MeadR.(1988)The Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles for Practical Application.Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

Van Der Meer J., 1996, Effect of observer differences on abundance estimates of seabirds from ship‐based strip transect surveys., Ibis, 24, 433

10.1016/0006-3207(94)90011-6

PykeG. H.&RecherH. F.(1983) Censusing Australian birds: a summary of procedures and a scheme for the standardisation of data presentation and storage. In:Methods of Censusing Birds in Australia.(ed. S. J. Davies) pp. 55–63. Proceedings of a symposium organised by the Zoology section of the ANZAAS and the Western Australian Group of the Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union. Department of Conservation and Environment Perth.

10.1071/WR9850307

RalphC. J. SauerJ. R.&DroegeS.(1997)Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts.U.S.D.A. Forest Service. General Technical Report PSW‐GTR‐149. Pacific Southwest Research Station Albany California.

RecherH. F.(1984) Use of bird census procedures in Australia: a review. In: Methods of censusing birds in Australia.(ed. S. J. Davies) pp. 3–13. Proceedings of a symposium organised by the Zoology section of the ANZAAS and the Western Australian Group of the Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union. Department of Conservation and Environment Perth.

Recher H. F., 1988, Counting terrestrial birds: use and application of census procedures in Australia., Aust. Zool. Rev., 24, 25

10.1214/ss/1177011926

SaundersD. A.&IngramJ.(1995)Birds of Southwestern Australia.Surrey Beatty and Sons Chipping Norton.

10.1071/MU9940009

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Wiley

Tập 24 Số 3

270-277

Thông tin tác giả