Quantifying landscape externalities of renewable energy development: Implications of attribute cut-offs in choice experiments
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aizaki, 2012, A noncompensatory choice experiment analysis of Japanese consumers’ purchase preferences for beef, Appl. Econ. Lett., 19, 439, 10.1080/13504851.2011.583207
Álvarez-Farizo, 2002, Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain, Energy Policy, 30, 107, 10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00063-5
Bergmann, 2008, Rural versus urban preferences for renewable energy developments, Ecol. Econ., 65, 616, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.011
Boyle, 2019, NIMBY, not, in siting community wind farms, Resour. Energy Econ., 57, 85, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2019.04.004
Bush, 2009, Should all choices count? Using the cut-offs approach to edit responses in a choice experiment, J. Environ. Res. Econ., 44, 397, 10.1007/s10640-009-9292-6
BWE (Bundesverband Windenergie e.V.), 2020
Cicia, 2012, Fossil energy versus nuclear, wind, solar and agricultural biomass: insights from an Italian national survey, Energy Policy, 42, 59, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.030
Colombo, 2016, Analysis of choice inconsistencies in on-line choice experiments: impact on welfare measures, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., 43, 271, 10.1093/erae/jbv016
Danielis, 2007, Attribute cut-offs in freight service selection, Transport. Res. Part E, 43, 506, 10.1016/j.tre.2005.10.002
Dimitropoulos, 2009, Assessing the determinants of local acceptability of wind-farm investment: a choice experiment in the Greek Aegean Islands, Energy Policy, 38, 1842, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.002
Ding, 2012, The influence of attribute cut-offs and consumers’ choices of a functional food, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., 39, 745, 10.1093/erae/jbr067
Drechsler, 2017, Efficient and equitable spatial allocation of renewable power plants at the country scale, Nat. Energy, 2
Dugstad, 2020, Acceptance of wind power development and exposure – not-in-anybody’s-backyard, Energy Policy, 147, 111780, 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111780
Elrod, 2004, A new integrated model of noncompensatory and compensatory decision strategies, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 95, 1, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.06.002
Feo-Valero, 2016, Rail freight transport and demand requirements: an analysis of attribute cut-offs through a stated preference experiment, Transportation, 43, 101, 10.1007/s11116-014-9566-x
Glenk, 2020, Spatial dimensions of stated preference valuation in environmental and resource economics: methods, trends and challenges, Environ. Resour. Econ. (Dordr), 75, 215, 10.1007/s10640-018-00311-w
Hensher, 2012, The influence of alternative acceptability, attribute thresholds and choice response certainty on automobile purchase preferences, J. Trans. Econ. Policy, 46, 451
Hess, 2019, Apollo: a flexible, powerful and customizable freeware package for choice model estimation and application, J. Choice Model., 32, 10.1016/j.jocm.2019.100170
Huber, 1991, Adapting cutoffs to the choice environment: the effects of attribute correlation and reliability, J. Consum. Res., 18, 346, 10.1086/209264
Ju, 2014, The environmental cost of overhead power transmission lines: the case of Korea, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 57, 812, 10.1080/09640568.2013.770388
Kim, 2020, Research on local acceptance cost of renewable energy in South Korea: a case study of photovoltaic and wind power projects, Energy Policy, 144, 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111684
Kosenius, 2013, Valuation of environmental and societal trade-offs of renewable energy sources, Energy Policy, 62, 1148, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.020
Krueger, 2011, Valuing the visual disamenity of offshore wind power projects at varying distances from the shore: an application on the Delaware Shoreline, Land Econ., 87, 268, 10.3368/le.87.2.268
Ladenburg, 2009, Visual impact assessment of offshore wind farms and prior experience, Appl. Energy, 86, 380, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.05.005
Ladenburg, 2012, The economics of visual disamenity reductions of offshore wind farms—review and suggestions from an emerging field, Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 16, 6793, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.08.017
Leong, 2012, Embedding decision heuristics in discrete choice models: a review, Trans. Rev., 32, 313, 10.1080/01441647.2012.671195
Li, 2015, The effect of choice set misspecification on welfare measures in random utility models, Resour. Energy Econ., 42, 71, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.07.001
Liebe, 2018, Uncovering the nexus between attitudes, preferences, and behaviour in sociological applications of stated choice experiments, Sociol. Methods Res.
Lutzeyer, 2018, The amenity costs of offshore wind farms: evidence from a choice experiment, Energy Econ., 71, 621, 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.020
Manski, 1977, The structure of random utility models, Theory Decis., 8, 229, 10.1007/BF00133443
Marcucci, 2011, Regional airport choice: consumer behaviour and policy implications, J. Transp. Geogr., 19, 70, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.10.001
Martínez, 2009, The constrained multinomial logit model: a semi-compensatory choice model, Trans. Res. Part B: Method., 43, 10.1016/j.trb.2008.06.006
Masurowski, 2016, A spatially explicit assessment of the wind energy potential in response to an increased distance between wind turbines and settlements in Germany, Energy Policy, 97, 343, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.021
McNair, 2011, Households’ willingness to pay for overhead-to-underground conversion of electricity distribution networks, Energy Policy, 39, 2560, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.023
Mentzakis, 2011, A discrete choice experiment investigating preferences for funding drugs used to treat orphan diseases: an exploratory study, Health Econ. Policy Law, 6, 405, 10.1017/S1744133110000344
Moser, 2012, Consumer preferences for sustainable production methods in apple purchasing behaviour: a non-hypothetical choice experiment, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 36, 141, 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01083.x
Moser, 2014, Does attribute cut-off elicitation affect choice consistency? Contrasting hypothetical and real-money choice experiments, J. Choice Model., 11, 16, 10.1016/j.jocm.2014.02.003
Öko-Institut e. V, 2018
Peri, 2020, What really undermines public acceptance of wind turbines? A choice experiment analysis in Israel, Land Use Policy, 99, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105113
Peschel, 2016, Explaining the use of attribute cut-off values in decision making by means of involvement, J. Behav. Exp. Econ., 65, 58, 10.1016/j.socec.2016.08.007
Plum, 2019, Public preferences for the Swiss electricity system after the nuclear phase-out: a choice experiment, Energy Policy, 2019, 181, 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.054
Robinius, 2020, Cost-efficient and climate-friendly transformation strategies for the German energy system up to 2050, Jülich
Roman, 2017, A latent class model with attribute cut-offs to analyze modal choice for freight transport, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 102, 212, 10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.020
Scarpa, 2008, Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why, Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 52, 253, 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2007.00436.x
Simon, 2004, Construction of preferences by constraint satisfaction, Psychol. Sci., 15, 331, 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00678.x
Stede, 2020
Strazzera, 2011, Combining choice experiments with psychometric scales to assess the social acceptability of wind energy projects: a latent class approach, Energy Policy, 48, 334, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.037
Swait, 2001, A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cutoffs, Trans. Res. Part B: Method., 35, 903, 10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00030-8
Swait, 1987, Incorporating random constraints in discrete choice models of choice set generation, Trans. Res. Part B: Method., 21, 91, 10.1016/0191-2615(87)90009-9
Train, 2009
Train, 2005, Discrete choice models in preference space and willingness-to-pay space, 6
Truong, 2015, Modeling non-compensatory preferences in environmental valuation, Resour. Energy Econ., 39, 89, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.12.001
Zhang, 2019, Threshold incorporating freight choice modeling for hinterland leg transportation chain of export containers, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 130, 858, 10.1016/j.tra.2018.01.027