Quantifying Subpopulation Differences for a Lack of Invariance Using Complex Examinee Profiles: An Exploratory Multigroup Approach Using Functional Data Analysis

Adams RJ, 1997, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 47, 10.3102/10769986022001047

10.1111/j.1745-3984.1999.tb00553.x

Baker FB 1995 EQUATE: Computer program for equating two metrics in item response theory [Computer software] Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Laboratory of Experimental Design

Berkhin P 2002Survey of clustering data mining techniques(Technical Report), San Jose, CA: Accrue Software

Breiman L Friedman J Olshen R Stone C 1984Classification and regression treesPacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth

Buck G, 1997, Language Learning, 47, 423, 10.1111/0023-8333.00016

Budgell GR, 1995, Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 309, 10.1177/014662169501900401

Burket G 1998 PARDUX [Computer software] Los Angeles: CTB/McGraw-Hill

10.1111/j.1745-3992.1998.tb00619.x

Dempster AP, 1977, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 39, Series B, 1

Embretson SE Reise SP 2000Item response theory for psychologistsMahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Engelhard, Jr G, 1992, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 275, 10.1177/0013164492052002003

Fasulo D 1999An analysis of recent work on clustering algorithms(Technical Report 01 – 03 – 02), Seattle, WA: Department of Computer Science & Engineering at the University of Washington

10.1207/s15327906mbr3104_2

10.1007/BF02294839

Fraley C Raftery AE 1998How many clusters? Which cluster method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis(Technical Report 329), Seattle, WA: Department of Statistics at the University of Washington

Glas CAW 2001 Differential item functioning depending on general covariates In A. Boomsma, M.A.J. van Duijn, & T.A.B. Snijders (Eds.),Essays on item response theory(pp.131 – 148) New York: Springer-Verlag

Hambleton RK Swaminathan H Rogers HJ 1991Fundamentals of item response theoryNewbury Park, CA: Sage

Jöreskog KG Sörbom D 2001 PRELIS [Computer software] Chicago: Scientific Software International

Johnson RA Wichern DW 1982Applied multivariate statistical analysisEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice – Hall

Junker BW 1999Some statistical models and computational methods that may be useful for cognitively-relevant assessmentUnpublished manuscript. Available online at http://www.stat.cmu.edu/∼brian/nrc/cfa

Kaskowitz GS, 2001, Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 39, 10.1177/01466216010251003

10.1111/j.1745-3984.1995.tb00466.x

10.1007/BF03173189

10.1007/978-1-4757-2412-7

Lord FM 1980Applications of item response theory to practical testing problemsHillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

10.1007/BF02294825

Meredith W Horn J 2001 The role of factorial invariance in modeling growth and change In L.M. Collins & A.G. Sayer (Eds.),New methods for the analysis of change: Decade of behavior(pp. 203 – 240) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Messick S 1989 Validity In R. Linn (Ed.),Educational measurement(pp. 13 – 103) New York: Macmillan

Messick S, 1995, American Psychologist, 50, 741, 10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741

Mullis IVS Martin MO Smith TA Garden RA Gregory KD Gonzalez EJ Chrostowski SJ O'Connor KM 2001TIMSS assessment framework and specifications 2003Chestnut Hill, MA: International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College, Available online at http://timss.bc.ed

Petersen NS Kolen MJ Hoover HD 1989 Scaling, norming, and equating In R.L. Linn (Ed.),Educational Measurement(3rd ed., pp. 221 – 262) New York: Macmillan

10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.517

Ramsay JO, 1991, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 53, 539, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1991.tb01844.x

10.1007/978-1-4757-7107-7

10.1007/b98886

10.3102/10769986004003207

10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.552

Rogers HJ Swaminathan H Egan K 1999, AprilA multi-level approach for investigating differential item functioningPaper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). Montréal, QC

10.1207/S15327574IJT0304_5

Rupp AA, 2002, International Journal of Testing, 1, 185, 10.1207/S15327574IJT013&4_2

Steinberg D Colla P 1997CART – Classification and regression trees[Computer software], San Diego, CA: Salford-Systems

10.1126/science.103.2684.677

10.1177/014662168300700208

10.1111/j.1745-3984.1999.tb00561.x

10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6

Vermunt JK Magidson J 2002 Latent class cluster analysis In J.A. Hagenaars & A.L. McCutcheon (Eds.),Advances in latent class analysis(pp. 89 – 106) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

10.1177/0146621602261005

10.1207/s15324818ame0803_3

10.1207/s15324818ame0804_4

Zhang Y Matthews-Lopez JL Dorans NJ 2003, AprilAssessing effects of item deletion due to DIF on the performance of SAT I®: Reasoning test subpopulationsPaper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education, Chicago, IL

10.1080/02701367.1998.10607662

Zimowski MF Muraki E Mislevy RJ Bock RD 1996 BILOG-MG: Multiple-group IRT analysis and test maintenance for binary items [Computer software] Chicago: Scientific Software International

Zumbo BD, 1997, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 963, 10.1177/0013164497057006006