Quantification of the potential impact of nature conservation on ecosystem services supply in the Flemish Region: A cascade modelling approach

Arcadis Belgium, EFTEC, et al., 2011. Recognizing Natura 2000 Benefits and Demonstrating the Economic Benefits of Conservation Measures – Development of a Tool for Valuing Conservation Measures, Report for the European Commission. <http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/financing/docs/Recognizing_Natura2000_benefits.pdf>. Amann, 2011, Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: modeling and policy applications, Environ. Model. Softw., 26, 1489, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.012 Bagstad, 2013, A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation, Ecosyst. Serv., 5, 27, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004 Bateman, 2013, Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom, Science, 341, 45, 10.1126/science.1234379 Baro, 2016, Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: a case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region, Land Use Policy, 57, 405, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006 Benjamini, 1995, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, 57, 125 Benjamini, 2001, The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency, Ann. Stat., 29, 1165, 10.1214/aos/1013699998 Boerema, 2016, Are ecosystem services adequately quantified?, J. Appl. Ecol. Boumans, 2015, The Multiscale Integrated Model of Ecosystem Services (MIMES): simulating the interactions of coupled human and natural systems, Ecosyst. Serv., 12, 30, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.004 Broekx, S., De Nocker, L., Liekens, I., Poelmans, L., Staes, J., Van der Biest, K., et al., 2013. Estimate of the Benefits Delivered by the Flemish Natura 2000 Network. Study Carried Out on the Authority of the Agency for Nature and Forests (ANB/IHD/11/03) by VITO, Universiteit Antwerpen and Universiteit Gent 2013/RMA/R/87 (March 2013). Buekers, 2011, Ten years of research and policy on particulate matter air pollution in hot spot Flanders, Environ. Sci. Policy, 14, 347, 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.10.012 Burkhard, 2009, Landscapes ‘capacities to provide ecosystem services – a concept for land-cover based assessments, Landsc. Online, 15, 1, 10.3097/LO.200915 Burkhard, 2012, Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets, Ecol. Ind., 21, 17, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 Castro, 2014, Ecosystem service trade-offs from supply to social demand: a landscape-scale spatial analysis, Landsc. Urban Plan., 132, 102, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.009 Chessel, 2004, The ade4 package-I – one-table methods, R News, 4, 5 Cowling, 2008, An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 9483, 10.1073/pnas.0706559105 De Decker, 2011, Understanding housing sprawl: the case of Flanders, Belgium, Environ. Plan. A, 43, 1634, 10.1068/a43242 de Groot, 2010, Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making [Article; Proceedings Paper], Ecol. Complex., 7, 260, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 Dolédec, 1994, Co-inertia analysis: an alternative method for studying species-environment relationships, Freshw. Biol., 31, 277, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01741.x EC, 1979. The Council Directive 79/409/EEC on the Protection of Wild Birds (April 1979). EC, 1992. The Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (May 1992). EC, 2012. European Parliament Resolution of 20 April 2012 on Our Life Insurance, Our Natural Capital: An EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 (2011/2307(INI)). Eigenbrod, 2010, The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services, J. Appl. Ecol., 47, 377, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01777.x Emmett, 2016, Spatial patterns and environmental constraints on ecosystem services at a catchment scale, Sci. Total Environ., 572, 1586, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.004 Engelen, G., 2006. Cellular automata based land use models – applications for environmental risk management. In: The Joint AFAC/IFCAA Bushfire CRC Conference Tools for Environmental Risk Management, Melbourne, Australia, 2006-08-10–200608-13. Escoufier, 1973, Le traitement des variables vectorielles, Biometrics, 29, 751, 10.2307/2529140 Evans, 2012, Building the European Union's Natura 2000 network, Nat. Conserv.-Bulgaria, 11, 10.3897/natureconservation.1.1808 Fisher, 2008, Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research [Review], Ecol. Appl., 18, 2050, 10.1890/07-1537.1 Foley, 2005, Global consequences of land use, Science, 309, 570, 10.1126/science.1111772 Francesconi, 2016, Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to model ecosystem services: a systematic review, J. Hydrol., 535, 625, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.034 Fu, 2013, Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services [Review], Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 5, 4, 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.12.002 Geijzendorffer, 2013, Can biodiversity monitoring schemes provide indicators for ecosystem services?, Ecol. Ind., 33, 148, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.010 Grêt-Regamey, 2015, On the effects of scale for ecosystem services mapping, PLoS ONE, 9, e112601, 10.1371/journal.pone.0112601 Haines-Young, 2010, The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being, 110 Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., 2013. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. EEA Framework Contract No. EEA/IEA/09/003. Download at www.cices.eu or www.nottingham.ac.uk/cem. Heo, 1999, A permutation test of association between configurations by means of the RV coefficient, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput., 29, 843 Jacobs, 2015, 'The Matrix Reloaded': a review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services, Ecol. Model., 295, 21, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.024 Jackson, 2013, Polyscape: a GIS mapping framework providing efficient and spatially explicit landscape-scale valuation of multiple ecosystem services, Landsc. Urban Plan., 112, 74, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.014 Jax, 2013, Ecosystem services and ethics [Article], Ecol. Econ., 93, 260, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.008 Kati, 2015, The challenge of implementing the European network of protected areas Natura 2000, Conserv. Biol., 29, 260, 10.1111/cobi.12366 Kerselaers, 2013, Changing land use in the countryside: stakeholders’ perception of the ongoing rural planning processes in Flanders, Land Use Policy, 32, 197, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.10.016 Kettunen, M., Bassi, S., Gantioler, S., ten Brink, P., 2009. Assessing Socio-economic Benefits of Natura 2000 – A Toolkit for Practitioners (September 2009 Edition). Output of the European Commission Project Financing Natura 2000: Cost Estimate and Benefits of Natura 2000 (Contract No.: 070307/2007/484403/MAR/B2). Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), Brussels, Belgium. 191 pp. Koschke, 2012, A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning, Ecol. Ind., 21, 54, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010 Kroll, 2012, Rural–urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics, Land Use Policy, 29, 521, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008 Lambin, 2001, The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths, Glob. Environ. Change-Hum. Policy Dimens., 11, 261, 10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3 Lammar, P., Hens, L., 2005. Health and Mobility in Flanders (Belgium) Environmental Health Impacts of Transport and Mobility. pp. 199–222. Lautenbach, 2011, Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data, Ecol. Ind., 11, 676, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.09.007 Logsdon, 2013, A quantitative approach to evaluating ecosystem services, Ecol. Model., 257, 57, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.02.009 Louette, 2015, Implementing the habitats directive: how science can support decision making, J. Nat. Conserv., 23, 27, 10.1016/j.jnc.2014.12.002 Malinga, 2015, Mapping ecosystem services across scales and continents - A review, Ecosystem Services, 13, 57, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.006 MEA, 2005 McCarthy, D., Morling, P., 2014. A Guidance Manual for Assessing Ecosystem Services at Natura 2000 Sites. Produced as Part of the Natura People Project, Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the INTERREG IV A 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Programme 2007–2013. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy, Bedfordshire. Morse-Jones, 2011, Ecosystem valuation: some principles and a partial application [Article], Environmetrics, 22, 675, 10.1002/env.1073 Nemec, 2013, Biodivers Conserv, 22, 1, 10.1007/s10531-012-0406-z Nelson, 2009, Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales [Review], Front. Ecol. Environ., 7, 4, 10.1890/080023 Nelson, E.J., Daily, G.C., 2010. Modeling ecosystem services in terrestrial systems. F1000. Biol. Rep. 2(53), http://doi.org/10.3410/B2-53. Peh, 2013, TESSA: a toolkit for rapid assessment of ecosystem services at sites of biodiversity conservation importance, Ecosyst. Serv., 5, E51, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.003 Poelmans, 2009, Detecting and modelling spatial patterns of urban sprawl in highly fragmented areas: a case study in the Flanders-Brussels region, Landsc. Urban Plan., 93, 10, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.05.018 Pullin, 2004, Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making?, Biol. Conserv., 119, 245, 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.007 Qiu, 2013, Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110, 12149, 10.1073/pnas.1310539110 Rabe, 2016, National ecosystem services mapping at multiple scales – the German exemplar, Ecol. Ind., 70, 357, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.043 R Development Core Team., 2009. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna. URL http://www.R-project.org RBINS, 2014. Fifth National Report of Belgium to the Convention on Biological Diversity. CBD, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences. <https://www.cbd.int/reports>. Ruckelshaus, 2015, Notes from the field: lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions, Ecol. Econ., 115, 11, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009 Schröter, 2014, Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter-arguments, Conserv. Lett., 7, 514, 10.1111/conl.12091 Schröter, 2015, Lessons learned for spatial modelling of ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting, Ecosyst. Serv., 13, 64, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.003 Schulp, 2014, Uncertainties in ecosystem service maps: a comparison on the European scale [Article], PLoS ONE, 9, 10.1371/journal.pone.0109643 Secretariat of the CBD, 2010. Convention on Biological Diversity – Global Biodiversity Outlook 3. Montréal. Seppelt, 2011, A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead [Letter], J. Appl. Ecol., 48, 630, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x Spangenberg, J.H., Settele, J., 2010. Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. [Article; Proceedings Paper]. Ecol. Comp. 7(3), 327–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.007. Sharp, 2015 Tallis, 2009, vol. 1162, 265 TEEB, 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. Toman, 1998, Special section: forum on valuation of ecosystem services: why not to calculate the value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Ecol. Econ., 25, 57, 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00017-2 Van der Biest, 2015, Evaluation of the accuracy of land-use based ecosystem service assessments for different thematic resolutions, J. Environ. Manage., 156, 41, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.018 Verhagen, 2016, Effects of landscape configuration on mapping ecosystem service capacity: a review of evidence and a case study in Scotland, Landsc. Ecol., 31, 1457, 10.1007/s10980-016-0345-2 Vigerstol, 2011, A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services, J. Environ. Manage., 92, 2403, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.040 Villa, 2014, A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment, PLoS ONE, 9, e91001, 10.1371/journal.pone.0091001 Vorstius, 2015, A comparison of ecosystem services mapping tools for their potential to support planning and decision-making on a local scale, Ecosyst. Serv., 15, 75, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.07.007