Quality of reporting Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)
Tài liệu tham khảo
Melynk, 2005
Rolfe, 1999, Insufficient evidence: the problems of evidence-based nursing, Nurse Educ Today, 19, 433, 10.1054/nedt.1999.0346
Sackett, 1996, Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t, BMJ, 312, 71, 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
Colon-Emeric, 2006, Translating Evidence-Based Falls Prevention into Clinical Practice in Nursing Facilities: results and Lessons from a Quality Improvement Collaborative, J Am Geriatr Soc, 54, 1414, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00853.x
Heater, 1988, Nursing interventions and patient outcomes: a meta-analysis of studies, Nurs Res, 37, 303, 10.1097/00006199-198809000-00008
Hlatky, 2005, Evidence-based medicine and policy: the case of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator, Health Aff (Millwood), 24, 42, 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.42
Melnyk, 2006, Consumer preferences and values as an integral key to evidence-based practice, Nurs Adm Q, 30, 123, 10.1097/00006216-200604000-00009
Burns, 2005
2004, Lost in clinical translation, Nat Med, 10, 879, 10.1038/nm0904-879
Jennings, 2004, Translational research: disrupting the status quo, Nurs Outlook, 52, 66, 10.1016/j.outlook.2004.01.003
Harris, 2001, Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process, Am J Prev Med, 20, 21, 10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00261-6
Moher, 1995, Assessing the quality of randomised controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists, Control Clin Trials, 16, 62, 10.1016/0197-2456(94)00031-W
Schulz, 2001, Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomised controlled trials: why bother?, Evid Based Nurs, 4, 4, 10.1136/ebn.4.1.4
Hulley, 2001
Jadad, 1996, Assessing the quality of reports of randomised clinical trials: is blinding necessary?, Control Clin Trials, 17, 1, 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
Moher, 1998, Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?, Lancet, 352, 609, 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01085-X
Sibbald, 1998, Understanding controlled trials, BMJ, 316, 201, 10.1136/bmj.316.7126.201
Omery, 1999, An appraisal of research utilization across the United States, J Nurs Adm, 29, 50, 10.1097/00005110-199912000-00011
Begg, 1996, Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials, JAMA, 276, 637, 10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030
Moher, 2001, The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials, Lancet, 357, 1191, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04337-3
Moher, 2001, The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials, JAMA, 285, 1987, 10.1001/jama.285.15.1987
Moher, 2003, The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials, Clin Oral Investig, 7, 2, 10.1007/s00784-002-0188-x
Bhandari, 2002, Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) in the Fracture Care Literature, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 84, 485, 10.2106/00004623-200203000-00023
Moher, 2001, Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation, JAMA, 285, 1992, 10.1001/jama.285.15.1992
Piggott, 2004, Has CONSORT improved the reporting of randomized controlled trials in the palliative care literature?, Palliat Med, 18, 32, 10.1191/0269216304pm857oa
Anttila, 2006, Quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in cerebral palsy, Pediatrics, 117, 2222, 10.1542/peds.2005-1630
Halpern, 2004, Compliance with the CONSORT checklist in obstetric anaesthesia randomised controlled trials, Int J Obstet Anesth, 13, 207, 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.03.009
Mills, 2005, The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement, Contemp Clin Trials, 26, 480, 10.1016/j.cct.2005.02.008
Devereaux, 2002, The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist, Control Clin Trials, 23, 380, 10.1016/S0197-2456(02)00214-3
Shadish, 2002
Bennett, 2005, The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT): guidelines for reporting randomized trials, Nurs Res, 54, 128, 10.1097/00006199-200503000-00007
Hopewell, 2005, Abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology conference: how completely are trials reported?, Clin Trials, 2, 265, 10.1191/1740774505cn091oa
Ioannidis, 2004, Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement, Ann Intern Med, 141, 781, 10.7326/0003-4819-141-10-200411160-00009
Hewitt, 2005, Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals, BMJ, 330, 1057, 10.1136/bmj.38413.576713.AE
Gibbins, 2002, Efficacy and safety of sucrose for procedural pain relief in preterm and term neonates, Nurs Res, 51, 375, 10.1097/00006199-200211000-00005
McGrath, 2003, Commentary: the Journal of Pediatric Psychology should adopt the CONSORT statement as a way of improving the evidence base in pediatric psychology, J Pediatr Psychol, 28, 169, 10.1093/jpepsy/jsg002
Broome, 2005, Ratings and rankings: judging the evaluation of quality, Nurs Outlook, 53, 215, 10.1016/j.outlook.2005.08.002