Quality of care: the need for medical, contextual and policy evidence in primary care
Tóm tắt
The increasing availability of medical evidence in clinical practice was expected to improve the quality of care. However, this has not been realized. A possible explanation is that quality of care is a complex concept and needs a wider scope. Starting from the Donabedian triangle of structure, process and outcome, a framework for the analysis of quality of care is presented. The need for three types of evidence is identified and discussed: medical, contextual and policy evidence. Although the body of medical evidence is increasing, it has major flaws and gaps hampering its applicability in primary care. There is also a need to focus on the context of the medical encounter, which has been shown to influence outcome, but is still not well researched. Finally, evidence on costs, cost utility and equity needs to be considered. Taking these different aspects of evidence into account, an agenda for research in primary care is set. The analytical framework may provide new insights in the quest for improving quality of health care.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Britten N., 2000, Misunderstandings in prescribing decisions in general practice: qualitative study, British Medical Journal, 320, 484, 10.1136/bmj.320.7233.484
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 2003, Public health and aging: health‐related quality of life among low‐income persons aged 45–64 years – United States, 1995–2001, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 52, 1120
Christiaens T.C.M., 2002, Randomised controlled trial of nitrofurantoin versus placebo in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in adult women, British Journal of General Practice, 52, 729
Cochrane Library(2004)Issue 2http://www.cochrane.org
De Sutter A.I., 2002, Does amoxicillin improve outcomes in patients with purulent rhinorrhea? A pragmatic randomized double‐blind controlled trial in family practice, Journal of Family Practice, 51, 317
Van Driel M., 2003, Evidence‐based medicine versus evidence‐based policy: family medicine in the frontline, European Journal of General Practice, 9, 124
Effective Health Care, 1999, Getting evidence into practice, Effective Health Care Bulletin, 5, 1
Elwyn G., 1999, Shared decision‐making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation, British Journal of General Practice, 49, 477
Lohr K.M., 1990, Medicare: A Strategy for Quality Assurance
Mold J., 1991, Goal‐oriented medical care, Family Medicine, 23, 46
NIVEL(2004)http://www.nivel.nl/peilstations/index.shtml(accessed 9 July 2004).
RIZIV [Belgian National Health Insurance Institute] Jaarverslag(2003) Available fromhttp://inami.fgov.be/presentation/nl/annual‐report/2003/ar2003‐nl.htm(accessed 9 July 2004).
Sackett D.L., 2002, Evidence‐Based Medicine. How to Practice and Teach EBM
Sunaert P., 1998, Inclusie, exclusie en uitval in relatie tot demografische en sociale economische kenmerken. [Inclusion, exclusion and drop‐out in relation to demographic and socio‐economic characteristics], Huisarts en Wetenschap, 41, 193
Van der Velden J., 1998, Sociale verschillen in morbiditeit en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk. [Social differences in morbidity and performance in general practice], Huisarts en Wetenschap, 41, 165
Willems S., 2004, Oxford Textbook of Primary Medical Care, 161
World Health Organisation(2004)World Health Report 2004. Changing History.Available fromhttp://www.who.International/whr/2004/en/(accessed 9 July 2004).