Quality indicators in acute stroke care: a prospective observational survey in 13 Italian regions

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research - Tập 26 - Trang 279-286 - 2013
Antonio Di Carlo1, Gabriele Accetta2, Marzio Bellan3, Gianna Terni2, Maria Lamassa4, Rebecca Facchini3, Annibale Biggeri2,5, Domenico Inzitari4, Salvatore Ferro3
1Institute of Neurosciences, Italian National Research Council, Florence, Italy
2Biostatistic Unit, ISPO Cancer Research and Prevention Institute, Florence, Italy
3Department of Hospital Services, Emilia-Romagna Region Health Authority, Bologna, Italy
4Neurosciences Section, Department of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
5Department of Statistics, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

Tóm tắt

Quality monitoring has great relevance in stroke care. The Project “How to guarantee adherence to effective interventions in stroke care” aimed to estimate adherence to acute-phase guidelines in stroke care in Italy. A prospective observational study was performed in 27 hospitals of 13 Italian Regions. Adherence to 15 process indicators was evaluated, comparing also stroke units (SU) with conventional wards. An overall score of care, defined as the sum of achieved indicators, was calculated. A multilevel hierarchical model described performance at patient, hospital and regional level. Overall, 484 consecutive stroke patients (mean age, 73.4 years; 52.7 % males) were included. Total score ranged from 2 to 15 (mean 8.5 ± 2.4). SU patients were more often evaluated with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) within 24 h, had more frequently an assessment of pre- and post-stroke disability, and a CT scan the same or the day after admission. Regional-hospital- and patient-level variability explained, respectively, 25, 34, and 41 % of total score variance. In multivariate models, patients >80 years vs. younger showed a change in total score of −0.45 (95 % CI −0.79 to −0.12), and those with NIHSS ≥14 vs. ≤5 of −0.92 (95 % CI −1.53 to −0.30). A negative change means a worse adjusted average adherence to process indicators. SU admission increased total score of 1.55 (95 % CI 0.52–2.58). Our data confirm the need of quality monitoring in stroke care. Although SU patients showed a better adherence to quality indicators, overall compliance was unsatisfactory.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Di Carlo A (2009) Human and economic burden of stroke. Age Ageing 38:4–5 Strong K, Mathers C, Bonita R (2007) Preventing stroke: saving lives around the world. Lancet Neurol 6:182–187 Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ (2006) Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 367:1747–1757 Evers SM, Struijs JN, Ament AJ, van Genugten ML, Jager JH, van den Bos GAM (2004) International comparison of stroke cost studies. Stroke 35:1209–1215 Di Carlo A, Baldereschi M, Gandolfo C, Candelise L, Ghetti A, Maggi S et al (2003) Stroke in an elderly population: incidence and impact on survival and daily function. The Italian longitudinal study on aging. Cerebrovasc Dis 16:141–150 Sacco S, Stracci F, Cerone D, Ricci S, Carolei A (2011) Epidemiology of stroke in Italy. Int J Stroke 6:219–227 Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration (2007) Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD000197 Candelise L, Gattinoni M, Bersano A, Micieli G, Sterzi R, Morabito A (2007) Stroke unit care for acute stroke patients: an observational follow-up study. Lancet 369:299–305 Ferro S, Pallazzoni P, Bellan M, Facchini R, Nonino F (2008) Assistenza all’ictus. Modelli organizzativi regionali. Regione Emilia Romagna, Agenzia Sanitaria e Sociale Regionale Kwan J, Sandercock P (2004) In-hospital care pathways for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD002924 Hatano S (1976) Experience from a multicentre stroke register: a preliminary report. Bull WHO 54:541–553 Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C (1991) Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet 337:1521–1526 SPREAD (Stroke Prevention and Educational Awareness Diffusion). Italian guidelines for stroke prevention and management. Available at http://www.spread.it (accessed February 20, 2013) Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party (2005) National sentinel stroke audit 2004. Royal College of Physicians, London Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party (2007) National sentinel stroke audit. Phase I (organisational audit), Phase II (clinical audit) 2006. Royal College of Physicians, London Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler GR, Barsan WG, Biller J et al (1989) Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 20:864–870 Mahoney FI, Barthel DW (1965) Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J 14:61–65 Rankin J (1957) Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60, II: prognosis. Scott Med J 2:200–215 Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S (2004) Generalized latent variable modelling: multilevel, longitudinal and structural equation models. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A (2008) Multilevel and longitudinal modelling using Stata, 2nd edn. Stata Press, College Station Grol R, Grimshaw J (2003) From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 362:1225–1230 Heuschmann PU, Di Carlo A, Bejot Y, Rastenyte D, Ryglewicz D, Sarti C et al (2009) Incidence of stroke in Europe at the beginning of the 21st century. Stroke 40:1557–1563 Johnston SC, Mendis S, Mathers CD (2009) Global variation in stroke burden and mortality: estimates from monitoring, surveillance, and modelling. Lancet Neurol 8:345–354 Heuschmann PU, Wiedmann S, Wellwood I, Rudd A, Di Carlo A, Bejot Y et al (2011) European Registers of Stroke. Three-month stroke outcome: the European Registers of Stroke (EROS) investigators. Neurology 76:159–165 Wiedmann S, Norrving B, Nowe T, Abilleira S, Asplund K, Dennis M et al (2012) Variations in quality indicators of acute stroke care in 6 European countries: The European implementation score (EIS) collaboration. Stroke 43:458–463 Heuschmann PU, Biegler MK, Busse O, Elsner S, Grau A, Hasenbein U et al (2006) Development and implementation of evidence-based indicators for measuring quality of acute stroke care: the quality indicator board of the german stroke registers study group (ADSR). Stroke 37:2573–2578 Reeves MJ, Gargano J, Maier KS, Broderick JP, Frankel M, LaBresh KA et al (2010) Patient-level and hospital-level determinants of the quality of acute stroke care: a multilevel modeling approach. Stroke 41:2924–2931 Grau AJ, Eicke M, Biegler MK, Faldum A, Bamberg C, Haass A et al (2010) Quality monitoring of acute stroke care in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, 2001–2006. Stroke 41:1495–1500 Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party (2011) National sentinel stroke audit 2010. Royal College of Physicians, London Bersano A, Candelise L, Sterzi R, Micieli G, Gattinoni M, Morabito A, The PROSIT Study Group. Stroke Unit care in Italy (2006) Results from PROSIT (Project on stroke services in Italy). A nationwide study. Neurol Sci 27:332–339 Di Carlo A, Lamassa M, Pracucci G, Basile AM, Trefoloni G, Vanni P et al (1999) Stroke in the very old. Clinical presentation and determinants of 3-month functional outcome: a European perspective. Stroke 30:2313–2319 Zeevi N, Chhabra J, Silverman IE, Lee NS, McCullough LD (2007) Acute stroke management in the elderly. Cerebrovasc Dis 23:304–308 Sanossian N, Ovbiagele B (2009) Prevention and management of stroke in very elderly patients. Lancet Neurol 8:1031–1041