Quadruple Helix Systems and Symmetry: a Step Towards Helix Innovation System Classification
Tóm tắt
Since the appearance of the Triple Helix model of innovations, various extensions of the model to higher dimensions, Quadruple, Quintuple, and N-tuple helices, had been proposed. Systemness of growing number of innovation system patterns can be expected to need classification. Also of no less importance is the way in which the new dimensions are added. This paper argues that while Triple Helix can be formed in a one unique way, the higher extensions can be composed in a number of possible ways, so that the classification can be made according to their topological or symmetry structure. The present paper alongside with presenting one more Triple Helix extension for the fourth dimension, which preserves the Triple Helix model rotational symmetry and comprises non-linear interaction in the joint working of the University, Industry, and Government institutional spheres with complement of an additional actor, Media, is a step to the classification of helix innovation system models on the symmetry base.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Baber, Z. (2001). Globalization and scientific research: the emerging triple helix of state-industry-university relations in Japan and Singapore. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 21, 401–408.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3), 201–234.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation, and environment relate to each other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2011). Open Innovation Diplomacy and 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge Production System. Journal of Knowledge Economy, 2, 327–372.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems, Springer Briefs in Business 7, doi 10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0_1.
Delyagin, M. (2003), The World crisis. General globalization theory. Infra-M.
Etzkowitz, H. (2002). MIT and the rise of entrepreneurial science. London: Routledge.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorf, L. (2000). The dynamic of innovations: from National System and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix—University-Industry-Government Relations: a laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Review, 14, 14–19.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The endless transition: a “triple helix” of university–industry–government relations. Minerva, 36, 203–208.
Etzkowitz, H. and Raiken, L. (1980). Artist social movements of the 1960’s and 70’s: from protest to institution formation. Eric.ed.gov ERIC No. ED186326
Etzkowitz, H. & Ranga, M. (2010). A Triple Helix System for knowledge-based regional development: from “Spheres” to “Spaces”. http://api.ning.com/files/qBHCyrgWGsw3b1rE26EcQYX0IMMm0k3FFExiR2jWPbP7FUel0*F*Oade11go9ceXwc4SAttHfBMzYQmSdR0H3ISETAEmL*SY/themepaper23Feb1vadjusted.pdf. Accessed 01 November 2013.
Etzkowitz, H., & Ranga, M. (2012). “Spaces”: a triple helix governance strategy for regional innovation. In A. Rickne, S. Laestadius, & H. Etzkowitz (Eds.), Innovation governance in an open economy: shaping regional nodes in a globalized world (p. 2012). Milton Park: Routledge.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, P. (1994). The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Ivanova, I. & Leydesdorff, L. (2013) Rotational symmetry and the transformation of Innovation Systems in a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, doi. : 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.022
Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix …, and an N-tuple of Helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 25–35.
Leydesdorff, L., & Besselaar, P. V. D. (1998). Technological development and factor substitution in a non-linear model. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 21, 173–192.
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23(5), 279–286.
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). Triple Helix of innovations: introduction. Science and Public Policy, 25(6), 358–364.
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Can “the public” be considered as a fourth helix in University-Industry-Government relations? Report of the Fourth Triple Helix Conference. Science & Public Policy, 30(1), 55–61.
Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2006). Triple Helix indicators of knowledge based innovation systems—introduction to the special issue. Research Policy, 35, 1441–1449.
Mehta, M. (2003). Regulating biotechnology and nanotechnology in Canada: a post-normal science approach for inclusion of the fourth helix. In Z. Baber and H. Klondker (Eds.) The Triple Helix. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Plasser, F. (2004), Politische Kommunikation in Oesterreich. Ein praxisnahes Handbuch. Vienna, WUV-Universitatsverlag.
Rassweiler, A. (2012). New iPad 32 GB + 4G carries $364.35 bill of materials. http://www.isuppli.com/Teardowns/News/Pages/New-iPad-32-GB-4G-Carries-364-35-Bill-of-Materials.aspx. Accessed 01 November 2013.
Shenkar, O. (2005). The Chinese century: the rising Chinese economy and its impact on the global economy, the balance of power, and your job, Wharton School Publishing, 2005.
Simmel, G. (1950). Individual and society. In K. H. Wolf (Ed.), The sociology of George Simmel. New York: Free Press.