Publication Ethics from the Perspective of PhD Students of Health Sciences: A Limited Experience
Tóm tắt
Publication ethics, an important subtopic of science ethics, deals with determination of the misconducts of science in performing research or in the dissemination of ideas, data and products. Science, the main features of which are secure, reliable and ethically obtained data, plays a major role in shaping the society. As long as science maintains its quality by being based on reliable and ethically obtained data, it will be possible to maintain its role in shaping the society. This article is devoted to the presentation of opinions of PhD candidate students in health sciences in Ankara concerning publication ethics. The data obtained from 143 PhD students from the fields of medicine, dentistry, pharmacy and veterinary reveal limited but unique experiences. It also shows that plagiarism is one of the worst issues in the publication ethics from the perspective of these young academics.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson, A. (1989). AAU issues guidelines on dealing with scientific fraud. Nature, 337, 196.
Arda B. (2004). Publication ethics in health sciences. In Arda, B., Kahya, E., Başağaç Gül, T. (Eds.), Science ethics and history of sciences (1st Ed., pp. 173-186). Ankara: Ankara University Publication. ISBN 975-482-651,X (in Turkish).
Arda, B., Kahya, E., Başağaç Gül, T. (2009a). Science ethics and history of science 2nd Ed. (1st ed. 2004). Ankara: Ankara University Publication. ISBN 978-975-482-810-8 (in Turkish).
Arda, B., Oğuz, N. Y., & Şahinoğlu, S. (2009b). Informed consent in medical education: The experience of the medical ethics department of Ankara university medical school. Journal of Ankara University School of Medicine, 62(4), 143–147.
Brumfiel, G. (2007). Turkish physicists face accusations of plagiarism. Nature, 449, 8. published online 5 Sep 2007.
Eastwood, S. (2000). Ethical scientific reporting and publication. Training the trainees. In A. H. Jones & F. McLellan (Eds.), Ethical issues in biomedical publication. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.
http://www.unesco.org/shs/ethics/geo/user/index.php?action=view&db=GEO3&id=115&lng=en&criteria=YToxOntzOjIwOiJQUk9fUkVTUE9OU0lCTEVfTkFNRSI7czoxMDoiQmVybmEgQXJkYSI7fQ%3D%3D. Accessed 23 Sep 2010.
Krulwich, T. A., & Friedman, P. J. (1993). Integrity in the education of researchers. Academic Medicine, 68(suppl 9), 14–18.
Pryer, E. R., Habermann, B., & Broome, M. E. (2007). Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: A national survey. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 365–369.
Rennie, S. C., & Rudland, J. R. (2003). Differences in medical students’ attitudes to academic misconduct and reported behaviour a cross the years: A questionaire study. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29, 97–102.
Resnik, D. B. (2007). The price of truth: How money affects the norms of science (pp. 94, 104–105, 116). Oxford, N Y: Oxford University Press.
Stern, J. E., & Elliott, D. (1997). The ethics of scientific research. A guidebook for course development (pp. 17–25). Hanover and London: University Press of New England.
Ten Have, H., & Ang, T. W. (2007). Unesco’s global ethics observatory. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 15–16.
Turkish High Council of Universities, Ethical Commission’s descriptions related with publication ethics, (ÜAK Etik Komisyonu yayın etiğine aykırı davranışlar) In: Arda, B., Kahya, E., Başağaç Gül, T. (Eds.) (2009). Science ethics and history of science, pp. 293–294 (in Turkish).