Public understanding of science and the perception of nanotechnology: the roles of interest in science, methodological knowledge, epistemological beliefs, and beliefs about science

Anderson A, Brossard D, Scheufele D (2010) The changing information environment for nanotechnology: online audiences and content. J Nanopart Res 12:1083–1094

Berube DM, Cummings CL, Frith JH, Binder AR, Oldendick R (2011) Comparing nanoparticle risk perceptions to other known EHS risks. J Nanopart Res 13:3089–3099

Besley J (2010) Current research on public perceptions of nanotechnology. Emerg Health Threats J 3:e8

Besley J, Kramer V, Priest S (2008) Expert opinion on nanotechnology: risks, benefits, and regulation. J Nanopart Res 10:549–558

Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Kim E, Lewenstein BV (2009) Religiosity as a perceptual filter: examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 18:546–558

Cacciatore MA, Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2011) From enabling technology to applications: the evolution of risk perceptions about nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 20:385–404

Cobb MD (2005) Framing effects on public opinion about nanotechnology. Sci Commun 27:221–239

Cobb MD (2011) Creating informed public opinion: citizen deliberation about nanotechnologies for human enhancements. J Nanopart Res 13:1533–1548

Cobb MD, Macoubrie J (2004) Public perceptions about nanotechnology: risks, benefits and trust. J Nanopart Res 6:395–405

Cobern WW, Loving CC (2002) Investigation of preservice elementary teachers’ thinking about science. J Res Sci Teach 39:1016–1031

Conley AM, Pintrich PR, Vekiri I, Harrison D (2004) Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemp Edu Psych 29:186–204

Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334

Friedman S, Egolf B (2005) Nanotechnology: risks and the media. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 24:5–11

Gott R, Duggan S (1998) Understanding scientific evidence. In: Ratcliff M (ed) ASE guide to secondary science education. Stanley Thornes, Cheltenham, pp 92–99

Ho SS, Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2010) Making sense of policy choices: understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 12:2703–2715

Ho SS, Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2011) Value predispositions, mass media, and attitudes toward nanotechnology: the interplay of public and experts. Sci Commun 33:167–200

Hofer BK, Pintrich PR (eds) (2002) Personal epistemology: the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Erlbaum, Mahwah

HRA (Hart Research Associates, Inc) (2009) Nanotechnology, synthetic biology, & public opinion. A report of findings conducted on behalf of: Project on emerging nanotechnologies, The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. http://www.nanotechproject.org/publications/archive/8286/ . Assessed 6 May 2011

Kahan DM, Braman D, Slovic P, Gastil J, Cohen G (2009) Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nat Nano 4:87–90

Lee C, Scheufele DA (2006) The influence of knowledge and deference toward scientific authority: a media effects model for public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journal Mass Commun Q 83:819–834

Lee C, Scheufele DA, Lewenstein BV (2005) Public attitudes toward emerging technologies. Sci Commun 27:240–267

Lewenstein BV, Gorss J, Radin J (2005) The salience of small: nanotechnology coverage in the American press, 1986–2004. Paper presented at the annual conference of International Communication Association, New York

Macoubrie J (2006) Nanotechnology: public concerns, reasoning and trust in government. Public Underst Sci 15:221–241

Marschall J, Rahnke M, Otto L, Maier M (2011) The representation of scientific evidence in German science TV shows and recipients’ understanding of science: results from an online field experiment. Paper presented at the annual conference of International Communication Association, Boston. http://www.uni-koblenz-landau.de/landau/fb8/ikms/ikm/forschung/wiskom )

Miller JD (1983) Scientific literacy: a conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus 112(2):29–48

National Science Board (2010) Science and engineering indicators: 2010. National Science Foundation, Arlington

Peters EM, Burraston B, Mertz CK (2004) An emotion-based model of risk perception and stigma susceptibility: cognitive appraisals of emotion, affective reactivity, worldviews, and risk perceptions in the generation of technological stigma. Risk Anal 24:1349–1367

Pidgeon N, Rogers-Hayden T (2007) Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: risk communication or ‘upstream engagement’? Health. Risk Soc 9:191–210

Pidgeon N, Herr Harthorn B, Bryant K, Rogers-Hayden T (2009) Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nat Nano 4:95–98

Priest S (2006) The North American opinion climate for nanotechnology and its products: opportunities and challenges. J Nanopart Res 8:563–568

Priest S, Greenhalgh T, Kramer V (2010) Risk perceptions starting to shift? U.S. citizens are forming opinions about nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 12:11–20

Satterfield T, Kandlikar M, Beaudrie CEH, Conti J, Herr Harthorn B (2009) Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies. Nat Nano 4:752–758

Scheufele DA, Lewenstein B (2005) The public and nanotechnology: how citizens make sense of emerging technologies. J Nanopart Res 7:659–667

Scheufele DA, Corley EA, Dunwoody S, Shih T, Hillback E, Guston DH (2007) Scientists worry about some risks more than the public. Nat Nano 2:732–734

Schommer M (1994) Synthesizing epistemological belief research: tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educ Psych Rev 6:293–319

Siegrist M (2010) Predicting the future: review of public perception studies in nanotechnology. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 16:837–846

Siegrist M, Keller C, Kastenholz H, Frey S, Wiek A (2007) Laypeople’s and experts’ perception of nanotechnology hazards. Risk Anal 27:59–69

Simons J, Zimmer R, Vierboom C, Härlen I, Hertel R, Böl G (2009) The slings and arrows of communication on nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 11:1555–1571

Stephens LF (2005) News narratives about nano S&T in major U.S. and non-U.S. newspapers. Sci Commun 27:175–199

Stewart CO, Dickerson DL, Hotchkiss R (2009) Beliefs about science and news frames in audience evaluations of embryonic and adult stem cell research. Sci Commun 30:427–452

Stocklmayer SM, Bryant C (2011) Science and the public—what should people know? Int J Sci Educ B. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.543186

Vandermoere F, Blanchemanche S, Bieberstein A, Marette S, Roosen J (2010) The morality of attitudes toward nanotechnology: about God, techno-scientific progress, and interfering with nature. J Nanopart Res 12:373–381

Vandermoere F, Blanchemanche S, Bieberstein A, Marette S, Roosen J (2011) The public understanding of nanotechnology in the food domain. Public Underst Sci 20:195–206