Public engagement in priority-setting: Results from a pan-Canadian survey of decision-makers in cancer control

Abelson, 2003, Public participation and citizen governance in the Canadian health system, 279 Abelson, 2002, Obtaining public input for health-systems decision-making: past experiences and future prospects, Can. Public Admin. Admin. Publique Du Canada, 45, 70, 10.1111/j.1754-7121.2002.tb01074.x Abelson, 2003, Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes, Soc. Sci. Med., 57, 239, 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00343-X Abelson, 1995, Does the community want devolved authority - results of deliberative polling in Ontario, Can. Med. Assoc. J., 153, 403 Amis, 2009, Patient involvement in NICE technology appraisals, 29 Arnstein, 1969, A ladder of citizen participation, J. Am. Inst. Plan., 216, 10.1080/01944366908977225 Berry, 2012, Variation and consternation: access to unfunded cancer drugs in Canada, J. Oncol. Pract., 8, 35, 10.1200/JOP.2011.000278 Burgess, 2014, From 'trust us' to participatory governance: deliberative publics and science policy, Public Underst. Sci., 23, 48, 10.1177/0963662512472160 Burgess, 2008, Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement, Pers. Med., 5, 285, 10.2217/17410541.5.3.285 Calnan, 1998, The patient's perspective, Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care, 14, 24, 10.1017/S0266462300010497 Cook, 2000, A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys, Educ. Psychol. Meas., 60, 821, 10.1177/00131640021970934 Coulter, 2004, Perspectives on health technology assessment: response from the patient's perspective, Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care, 20, 92, 10.1017/S0266462304000856 Daniels, 1997, Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers, Philos. Public Aff., 26, 303, 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00082.x Daniels, 2002 Dillman, 2009 Dobrow, 2006, The impact of context on evidence utilization: a framework for expert groups developing health policy recommendations, Soc. Sci. Med., 63, 1811, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.04.020 Fishkin, 1995 Gauvin, 2010, “It all depends”: conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies, Soc. Sci. Med., 70, 1518, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.036 Gibson, 2005, Evidence, economics and ethics: resource allocation in health services organizations, Healthc. Q., 8, 50, 10.12927/hcq..17099 Gibson, 2005, Priority setting in hospitals: fairness, inclusiveness, and the problem of institutional power differences, Soc. Sci. Med., 61, 2355, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.037 Hailey, 2006, Survey on the involvement of consumers in health technology assessment programs, Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care, 22, 497, 10.1017/S0266462306051427 Hamlett, 2003, Technology theory and deliberative democracy, Sci. Technol. Hum. Val., 28, 112, 10.1177/0162243902238498 Kapiriri, 2007, Priority setting at the micro-, meso- and macro-levels in Canada, Norway and Uganda, Health Policy, 82, 78, 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.09.001 Kapiriri, 2009, Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?, Soc. Sci. Med., 68, 766, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.011 Lewis, 2004, Regionalization: making sense of the Canadian experience, Healthc. Pap., 5, 12, 10.12927/hcpap.2004.16847 Lomas, 2005 Lomas, 1997, Devolving authority for health care in Canada's provinces: 2. Backgrounds, resources and activities of board members, Can. Med. Assoc. J., 156, 513 Martin, 2002, Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers, Health Policy, 61, 279, 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00237-8 Menon, 2011, Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions, Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res., 11, 75, 10.1586/erp.10.82 Menon, 2007, Priority-setting for healthcare: who, how, and is it fair?, Health Policy, 84, 220, 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.05.009 Mitton, 2002, Setting priorities in Canadian regional health authorities: a survey of key decision makers, Health Policy, 60, 39, 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00190-7 Mitton, 2009, Public participation in health care priority setting: a scoping review, Health Policy, 91, 219, 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.01.005 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2008 Newson, 2002, Parameters behind “nonparametric” statistics: Kendall's tau, Somers' D and median differences, Stata J., 2, 45, 10.1177/1536867X0200200103 Niemeyer, 2011, The emancipatory effect of deliberation: empirical lessons from mini-publics, Polit. Soc., 39, 103, 10.1177/0032329210395000 O'Doherty, 2012, Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation, Soc. Sci. Med., 75, 1604, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.026 Peacock, 2010, Priority setting methods and cancer control, 363 Pivik, 2004, A consumer involvement model for health technology assessment in Canada, Health Policy, 69, 253, 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.12.012 Reeleder, 2005, What do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions?, BMC Health Serv. Res., 5, 8, 10.1186/1472-6963-5-8 Romanow, 2002 Rowe, 2000, Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation, Sci. Technol. Hum. Val., 25, 3, 10.1177/016224390002500101 Rowe, 2005, A typology of public engagement mechanisms, Sci. Technol. Hum. Val., 30, 251, 10.1177/0162243904271724 Shih, 2009, Comparting response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: a meta-analysis, Educ. Res. Rev., 4, 26, 10.1016/j.edurev.2008.01.003 Teng, 2007, Priority setting in the provincial health services authority: survey of key decision makers, BMC Health Serv. Res., 7, 84, 10.1186/1472-6963-7-84 Veenstra, 1999, Home is where the governing is: social capital and regional health governance, Health Place, 5, 1, 10.1016/S1353-8292(98)00037-9 Whitty, 2013, An international survey of the public engagement practices of health technology assessment organizations, Value Health, 16, 155, 10.1016/j.jval.2012.09.011