Public attitudes toward genetic testing

Population Research and Policy Review - Tập 10 - Trang 235-255 - 1991
Eleanor Singer1
1Center for the Social Sciences, 814 School of International Affairs, Columbia University, New York, USA

Tóm tắt

This article, which reports the results of a telephone survey of a national sample of the adult US population, was designed as a first measure of attitudes in an area likely to undergo significant change over the next few years. Among the major findings: (1) First, attitudes toward prenatal testing are overwhelmingly favorable at this time, with about two thirds of the respondents saying they would want to undergo such tests themselves (or would want their partner to do so) and believing that the tests will do more good than harm. (2) Second, information about the new technology is not yet widely dispersed in society, and knowledge is unrelated to attitudes in any of the areas we measured. (3) Third, attitudes toward testing for genetic defects and attitudes toward abortion if tests are positive appear to be quite distinct so far. (4) Fourth, the particular conception of genetic defects held by the respondent influences preferences for abortion but not preferences for testing. (5) Fifth, testing for fetal sex clearly falls outside the pale of acceptable behavior at this time, but not if the couple already has three offspring of the same sex.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Cartwright, D. and F. Harary (1956). Structural balance: a generalization of Heider's theory, Psychological Review 63: 277–93. Davis, K. (1948). Human Society. New York: Macmillan. Davis, J.A. (1986). What the GSS tells us about social change, 1972–1985. GSS Technical Report #71. Chicago: NORC. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Row: Peterson. Granberg, D. (1984). Attributing attitudes to members of groups. In: J.R. Eiser (ed.), Attitudinal Judgement. New York: Springer-Verlag. Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization, Journal of Psychology 21: 107–12. Hyman, H.H. and P.B. Sheatsley (1954). The Authoritarian Personality: a methodological critique. In: R. Christie and M. Jahoda (eds.), Studies in the Scope and Method of ‘The Authoritarian Personality’. New York: Free Press. Newcomb, T.M. (1953). An approach to the study of communicative acts, Psychological Review 60: 393–404. Osgood, C.E. and P.H. Tannenbaum (1955). The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change, Psychological Review 62: 42–55. Page, B.I. and R.Y. Shapiro. The Rational Public. In press. Presidents Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1983). Screening and Counseling for Genetic Conditions. A Report on the Ethical, Social, and Legal Implications of Genetic Screening, Counseling, and Education Programs. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Scott, J. (1989). Conflicting beliefs about abortion: legal approval and moral doubts, Social Psychology Quarterly 52: 319–26. Singer, E. (1989a). Media coverage of genetic screening. Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University. Singer, E. (1989b). Progress report to National Science Foundation. Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University. Smith, T.W. (1986). A summary of findings from the general social surveys. GSS Technical Report #70. Chicago: NORC. Wilcox, C. (1990). Race differences in abortion attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 54: 248–55.