Public acceptance of semi-automated truck platoon driving. A comparison between Germany and California

Andersson, J., Englund, C., & Voronov, A. (2017). Study of communication needs in interaction between trucks and surrounding traffic in platooning. Retrieved from https://www.drivesweden.net/sites/default/files/content/final_report_-_40016_submitted.pdf. Becker, 2017, Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles, Transportation, 44, 1293, 10.1007/s11116-017-9808-9 Bevly, 2017 Ganula, B. (2014). Global Automotive Consumer Study: Exploring consumer preferences in key markets around the world. Technical Report. Deloitte. Buckley, 2018, Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: A simulated driving study, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 115, 202, 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.021 Castritius, 2020, Acceptance of truck platooning by professional drivers on German highways. A mixed methods approach, Applied Ergonomics, 85, 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103042 Charness, 2018, Predictors of attitudes toward autonomous vehicles: The roles of age, gender, prior knowledge, and personality, Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2589, 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02589 Chottani, A., Hastings, G., Murnane, J., & Neuhaus, F. (2018). Distraction or disruption? Autonomous trucks gain ground in US logistics. Retrieved November 11, 2019, from McKinsey & Company website: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/travel-transport-and-logistics/our-insights/distraction-or-disruption-autonomous-trucks-gain-ground-in-us-logistics. Curran, 1996, The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis, Psychological Methods, 1, 16, 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16 Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Retrieved from https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15192. Davis, 1989, User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, 35, 982, 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 Deutsche Bahn (2019). EDDI electronic drawbar-digital innovation. Project report-presentation of the results. Retrieved from https://www.deutschebahn.com/resource/blob/4136372/d08df4c3b97b7f8794f91e47e86b71a3/Platooning_EDDI_Project-report_10052019-data.pdf. Ellinghaus, D., & Steinbrecher, J. (2002). Lkw im Straßenverkehr. Eine Untersuchung über die Beziehung zwischen Lkw- und Pkw-Fahrern. In UNIROYAL Verkehrsuntersuchung (Vol. 48). Hannover: Continental AG. Engström, J., Bishop, R., Shladover, S. E., Murphy, M. C., O’Rourke, L., Voege, T., … Demato, D. (2019). Deployment of automated trucking: Challenges and opportunities. In G. Meyer & S. Beiker (Eds.), Road vehicle automation 5 (pp. 149–162). Fornell, 1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39, 10.1177/002224378101800104 Franke, 2019, A personal resource for technology interaction: development and validation of the affinity for technology interaction (ATI) scale, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35, 456, 10.1080/10447318.2018.1456150 Fröhlich, 2018, 129 Geistefeld, J. (2007). Verkehrsablauf und Verkehrssicherheit auf Autobahnen mit vierstreifigen Richtungsfahrbahnen (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://hss-opus.ub.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/opus4/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/23/file/diss.pdf. Gouy, 2014, Driving next to automated vehicle platoons: How do short time headways influence non-platoon drivers’ longitudinal control?, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 264, 10.1016/j.trf.2014.03.003 Griggs, T., & Wakabayashi, D. (2018, March 21). How a Self-Driving Uber Killed a Pedestrian in Arizona. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/03/20/us/self-driving-uber-pedestrian-killed.html. Hair, 2011, Journal of marketing theory and practice PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139, 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202 Heid, B., Dago Diedrich, Kässer, M., Küchler, S., & Kley, F. (2018). Route 2030 – The fast track to the future of the commercial vehicle industry. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Automotive and Assembly/Our Insights/Route 2030 The fast track to the future of the commercial vehicle industry/Route 2030 – The fast track to the future Howard, D., & Dai, D. (2014). Public Perceptions of Self-driving Cars: The Case of Berkeley, California. 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 14(No. 4502), 1–16. Jian, 2000, Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems, International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4, 53, 10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04 Kline, 2011 Kollmus, B., Treichel, H., & Quast, F. (2015). Tempolimits auf Bundesautobahnen. Schlussbericht zum Arbeitsprogramm-Projekt F1100.6110020. Retrieved from Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen website: https://bast.opus.hbz-nrw.de/opus45-bast/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/600/file/V1_BAB_Tempolimit_2008.pdf. Konvoi, V. (2009). Entwicklung und Untersuchung des Einsatzes von elektronisch gekoppelten Lkw-KONVOIs (Research Report BMBF 19G5024A-G). Aachen: RWTH Aachen Fakultät für Maschinenwesen. Kyriakidis, 2015, Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 32, 127, 10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014 Larburu, M., Sanchez, J., & Rodriguez, D. (2010). Safe road trains for environment: Human factors aspects in dual mode transport systems. ITS world congress, pp. 1–12. Busan, Korea. Liljamo, 2018, Attitudes and concerns on automated vehicles, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 59, 24, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.010 Liu, 2019, The effect of population age on the acceptable safety of self-driving vehicles, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 185, 341, 10.1016/j.ress.2019.01.003 Madigan, 2016, Acceptance of automated road transport systems (ARTS): An adaptation of the UTAUT model, Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 2217, 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.237 Nordhoff, 2018, User acceptance of automated shuttles in Berlin-Schöneberg: A questionnaire study, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 843, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.024 Nordhoff, 2019, A multi-level model on automated vehicle acceptance (MAVA): A review-based study, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 20, 682, 10.1080/1463922X.2019.1621406 Nowakowski, C., Shladover, S. E., Lu, X.-Y., Thompson, D., & Kailas, A. (2015). Cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) for truck platooning: Operational concept alternatives. UC Berkeley: California partners for advanced transportation technology, 1–37. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7jf9n5wm. Penmetsa, 2019, Perceptions and expectations of autonomous vehicles – A snapshot of vulnerable road user opinion, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 143, 9, 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.02.010 PwC Strategy&. (2016). Truck study 2016: The era of digitized trucking. Retrieved from https://mackinstitute.wharton.upenn.edu/. Ricardo UK Ltd. (2011). First demonstration of SARTRE vehicle platooning. Retrieved from https://ricardo.com/news-and-media/news-and-press/first-demonstration-of-sartre-vehicle-platooning. SAE International (2018). J3016_201806: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. Retrieved from https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_201806/. Sauer, A., Luz, F., Suda, M., & Weiland, U. (2005). Steigerung der Akzeptanz von FFH-Gebieten. Technical report (pp. 1–200). Bonn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz. Shladover, S. E., Lu, X.-Y., Yang, S., Ramezani, H., Spring, J., Nowakowski, C., … Mcauliffe, B. (2018). Cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) for partially automated truck platooning: Final report. UC Berkeley: California Partners for Advanced Transportation Technology. Retrieved from https://path.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/cacc_truck _platooning_finalreport.pdf. Skszek, S. (2004). Actual speeds on the roads compared to the posted limits (Report No. FHWAAZ04551). Retrieved from Arizona Deptartment of Transportation website: https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/speedmgt/ref_mats/fhwasa09028/resources/actual speeds on roadtopostedlimits.pdf. Venkatesh, 2003, User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27, 425, 10.2307/30036540 Venkatesh, 2016, Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead, Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 17, 328, 10.17705/1jais.00428 Xu, 2018, What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 95, 320, 10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.024 Yang, S., Shladover, S. E., Lu, X.-Y., Spring, J., Nelson, D., & Ramezani, H. (2018). A first investigation of truck drivers’ on-the-road experience using cooperative adaptive cruise control. UC berkeley: california partners for advanced transportation technology. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/92359572. Zhang, 2019, The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 98, 207, 10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018 Zmud, 2017, Towards an understanding of the travel behavior impact of autonomous vehicles, Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 2500, 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.281