Tâm thần học, Rối loạn hành vi và Kỳ thị: Liệu việc gán nhãn chẩn đoán có ảnh hưởng đến các khuyến nghị của nhân viên thử thách thanh thiếu niên?

Law and Human Behavior - Tập 29 - Trang 323-342 - 2005
Daniel C. Murrie1, Dewey G. Cornell2, Wendy K. McCoy1
1Department of Psychology, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville
2Virginia Youth Violence Project and Programs in Clinical and School Psychology, Curry School of Education, University of Virginia, Charlottesville

Tóm tắt

Nghiên cứu này điều tra ảnh hưởng tiềm tàng của việc gán nhãn cho một thanh thiếu niên là tâm thần. Các nhân viên thử thách thanh thiếu niên (JPOs; N = 260) đã đưa ra những khuyến nghị giả định dựa trên tám bản đánh giá tâm lý giả định. Các đánh giá này thay đổi sự hiện diện của hai tiêu chí chẩn đoán (lịch sử hành vi chống đối xã hội và đặc điểm tính cách tâm thần) và các nhãn chẩn đoán (tâm thần, rối loạn hành vi, không có chẩn đoán) nhằm phân biệt hiệu ứng tiêu chí với hiệu ứng gán nhãn. Các tiêu chí chẩn đoán về hành vi chống đối xã hội có ảnh hưởng đáng kể đến các khuyến nghị của JPO (kích thước hiệu ứng .50–.79), trong khi các tiêu chí chẩn đoán về tính cách tâm thần có ảnh hưởng hạn chế hơn. Thật ngạc nhiên, các nhãn chẩn đoán lại có ít ảnh hưởng, và không có sự khác biệt đáng kể giữa chẩn đoán rối loạn hành vi và tâm thần. Những phát hiện này minh họa tầm quan trọng của việc phân biệt hiệu ứng tiêu chí chẩn đoán với hiệu ứng gán nhãn chẩn đoán.

Từ khóa

#tâm thần học #rối loạn hành vi #gán nhãn chẩn đoán #nhân viên thử thách thanh thiếu niên #kỳ thị

Tài liệu tham khảo

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author. Brandt, J., Kennedy, W., Patrick, C., & Curtin, J. (1997). Assessment of psychopathy in a population of incarcerated adolescent offenders. Psychological Assessment, 9, 429–435. Cleckley, H. M. (1941). The mask of sanity. St. Louis, MO: Mosby. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. Colley, L., Culbertson, R. G., & Latessa, E. J. (1987). Juvenile probation officers: A job analysis. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 38, 1–12. Edens, J. F., Colwell, L. H., Desforges, D. M., & Fernandez, K. (in press). The impact of mental health evidence on support for capital punishment: Are defendants labeled psychopathic considered more deserving of death? Behavioral Science and the Law. Edens, J. F., Desforges, D. M., Fernandez, K., & Palac, C. A. (2004). Effects of psychopathy and violence risk testimony on mock juror perceptions of dangerousness in a capital murder trial. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 10, 393–412. Edens, J. F., Guy, L. S., & Fernandez, K. (2003). Psychopathic traits predict attitudes toward a juvenile capital murderer. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 807–828. Edens, J. F., Skeem, J. L., Cruise, K. R., & Cauffman, E. (2001). Assessment of “juvenile psychopathy” and its association with violence: A critical review. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 53– 80. Elliott, D. S. (1994). Serious violent offenders: Onset, developmental course, and termination. The American Society of Criminology 1993 presidential address. Criminology, 32, 1–21. Forth, A. E., Kosson, D. S., & Hare, R. D. (2003). The Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems. Forth, A. E., & Mailloux, D. L. (2000). Psychopathy in youth: What do we know? In C. Gacano (Ed), The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy (pp. 25–53). New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum. Frick, P. J. (1998). Callous-unemotional traits and conduct problems: Applying the two-factor model of psychopathy to children. In D. J. Cooke, et al. (Eds.), Psychopathy: Theory, research, and implications for society (pp. 161–187). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Frick, P. J., Barry, S. D., & Bodin, S. D. (2000). Applying the concept of psychopathy to children: Implications for the assessment of antisocial youth. In C. Gacano (Ed.), The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy. New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum. Frick, P. J., Cornell, A. H., Barry, C. T., Bodin, S. D., & Dane, H. E. (2003). Callous-unemotional traits and conduct problems in the prediction of conduct problem severity, aggression, and self-report of delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 457–470. Frick, P. J., Kimonis, E. R., Dandreaux, D. M., & Farell, J. M. (2003). The 4-year stability of psychopathic traits in non-referred youth. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 713–736. Frick, P. J., O’Brien, B. S., Wootton, J. M., & McBurnett, K. (1994). Psychopathy and conduct problems in children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 700–707. Greenland, C. (1999). “What does early antisocial behaviour predict?”: Reply. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 604. Gretton, H. M., Hare, R. D., & Catchpole, R. (2004). Psychopathy and offending from adolescence to adulthood: A 10-year follow up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 636–645. Gretton, H. M., McBride, M., Hare, R. D., O’Shaughnessy, R., & Kumka, G. (2001). Psychopathy and recidivism in adolescent sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 427–449. Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems. Hare, R. D. (1998). The Hare PCL-R: Some issues concerning its use and misuse. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 99–119. Hart, S. D., Watt, K. A., & Vincent, G. M. (2002). Commentary on Seagrave and Grisso: Impressions of the state of the art. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 241–145. Heilbrun, K., Marczyk, G., & DeMatteo, D. (Eds.). (2002). Forensic mental health assessment: A casebook. New York: Oxford University Press. Hemphill, J., Templeman, P., Wong, S., & Hare, R. (1998). Psychopathy and crime: Recidivism and criminal careers. In D. J. Cooke, et al. (Eds.), Psychopathy: Theory, research, and implications for society. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Johnstone, L., & Cooke, D. J. (2004). Psychopathic-like traits in childhood: Conceptual and measurement concerns. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22, 103–125. Kosson, D. S., Cyterski, T. D., Steuerwald, B. L., Neumann, C. S., & Walker-Matthews, S. (2002). The reliability and validity of the PCL:YV in nonincarcerated adolescent males. Psychological Assessment, 14, 97–109. Lee, Z., Vincent, G. M., Hart, S. D., & Corrado, R. R. (2003). The validity of the Antisocial Process Screening Device as a self-report measure of psychopathy in adolescent offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 771–786. Lipman, E. L., Bennett, K. J., Racine, Y. A., & Offord, D. R. (1999). “What does early antisocial behaviour predict?”: The authors respond. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 604. Lynam, D. R. (1996). Early identification of the chronic offenders: Who is the fledgling psychopath? Psychological Bulletin, 20, 209–234. Matarazzo, A., Carrington, P. J., & Hiscott, R. D. (2001). The effect of prior youth court dispositions on current disposition: An application of societal-reaction theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17, 169–200. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701. Murrie, D. C., & Cornell, D. G. (2002). Psychopathy screening of incarcerated juveniles: A comparison of measures. Psychological Assessment, 14, 390–396. Murrie, D. C., Cornell, D. G., Kaplan, S., McConville, D., & Levy-Elkon, A. G. (2004). Psychopathy scores and violence among juvenile offenders: A multi-measure study. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 49, 22–67. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (1996). Juvenile probation: The workhorse of the juvenile justice system (NCJ 158534). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Otto, R. K., & Heilbrun, K. (2002). The practice of forensic psychology: A look toward the future in light of the past. American Psychologist, 57, 5–18. Petrila, J., & Skeem, J. L. (2003). Juvenile psychopathy: The debate. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 689–694. Richters, J. E., & Cicchetti, D. (1993). Mark Twain meets DSM-III-R: Conduct disorder, development, and the concept of harmful dysfunction. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 5–29. Salekin, R. T. (2002). Psychopathy and therapeutic pessimism: Clinical lore or clinical reality? Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 79–112. Salekin, R. T., Rogers, R., & Sewell, K. W. (1996). A review and meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist and Psychopathy Checklist-Revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 203–213. Salekin, R. T., Rogers, R., & Ustad, K. L. (2001). Juvenile waiver to adult criminal courts: Prototypes for dangerousness, sophistication-maturity, and amenability to treatment. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 381–408. Salekin, R. T., Yff, R., Neumann, C. S., Leistico, A. R., & Zalot, A. A. (2002). Juvenile transfer to adult courts: A look at prototypes for dangerousness, sophistication-maturity, and amenability to treatment though a legal lens. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8, 373–410. Sanborn, J. B. (1996). Factors perceived to affect delinquent dispositions in juvenile court: Putting the sentencing decision into context. Crime and Delinquency, 42, 99–113. Seagrave, D., & Grisso, T. (2002). Adolescent development and the measurement of juvenile psychopathy. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 219–239. Skeem, J. L., & Cauffman, E. (2003). Views of the downward extension: Comparing the Youth Version of the Psychopathy Checklist with the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 737–770. Stafford, E., & Cornell, D. (2003). Psychopathy scores predict adolescent inpatient aggression. Assessment, 10, 102–112. Steinberg, L. (2002). The juvenile psychopath: Fads, fictions, and facts. National Institutes of Justice Perspectives on Crime and Justice: 2001 Lecture Series, 5, 35–64. Vincent, G. M., & Hart, S. D. (2002). Psychopathy in childhood and adolescence: Implications for the assessment and management of multiproblem youths. In R. R. Corrado, et al. (Eds.), Multi-problem violent youth: A foundation for comparative research on needs, interventions, and outcomes. Amsterdam: IOS Press.