Psychometric properties of the Zephyr bioharness device: a systematic review

Goris Nazari1, Pavlos Bobos1, Joy C. MacDermid2, Kathryn E. Sinden3, Julie Richardson4, Ada Tang4
1Physical Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada
2Roth, McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph’s Hospital, London, ON, Canada
3School of Kinesiology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
4McMaster University, School of Rehabilitation Science, 1400 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Johnstone JA, Ford PA, Hughes G, Watson T, ACS M, Garrett AT. Field based reliability and validity of the bioharness™ multivariable monitoring device. J Sports Sci Med. 2012;11:643–52.

Johnstone JA, Ford PA, Hughes G, Watson T, Garrett AT. Bioharness™ multivariable monitoring device: part II: reliability. J Sports Sci Med. 2012b;11(3):409–17.

Bianchi W, Freyer-Dugas A, Hsieh YH, Saheed M, Hill P, Lindauer C, Terzis A, Rothman RE. Revitalizing a vital sign: improving detection of Tachypnea at primary triage. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(1):37–43.

Yang C, Hsu Y. A review of Accelerometry-based wearable motion detectors for physical activity monitoring. Sensors. 2010;10:7772–88.

Collier R, Randolph AB. Wearable Technologies for Healthcare Innovation. Hilton Head Island: Proceedings of the Southern Association for Information Systems Conference; 2015.

Zephyr Technology. BioHarness 3.0 User ManualBioHarness 3.0 User Manual. Retrieved from 2012. https://www.zephyranywhere.com/resources/omnisense-software . Accessed Feb 2018.

Borresen J, Lambert MI. Quantifying training load: a comparison of subjective and objective methods. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2008;3:16–30.

Buchheit M, Simpson MB, Al Haddad H, Bourdon PC, Mendez-Villanueva A. Monitoring changes in physical performance with heart rate measures in young soccer players. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:711–23.

Hopkins WG. Quantification of training in competitive sports. Methods and applications. Sports Med. 1991;12:161–83.

Astrand PO, Ryhming I. Nomogram for calculations of aerobic capacity from pulse rate during submaximal work. J Appl Physiol. 1954;7:218.

Daanen HAM, Lamberts RP, Kallen VL, Jin A, Van Meeteren NLU. A systematic review on heart-rate recovery to monitor changes in training status in athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2012;7:251–60.

Brage S, Westgate K, Franks PW, Stegle O, Wright A, Ekelund U, Wareham NJ. Estimation of free-living energy expenditure by heart rate and movement sensing: a doubly-Labelled water study. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0137206.

Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.

De Bruin AF, Diederiks JPM, De Witte LP, Stevens FCJ, Philipsen H. Assessing the responsiveness of a functional status measure: the sickness impact profile versus the SIP68. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(5):529–40.

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327(8476):307–10.

MacDermid JC. Critical appraisal of study quality for psychometric articles, evaluation form. In: Law M, MacDermid JC, editors. Evidence-based rehabilitation. Thorofare: Slack Inc; 2008. p. 387–8.

MacDermid JC. Critical appraisal of study quality for psychometric articles, interpretation guide. In: Law M, MacDermid JC, editors. EvidenceBased rehabilitation. Thorofare: Slack Inc; 2008. p. 389–92.

Roy JS, Desmeules F, MacDermid JC. Psychometric properties of presenteeism scales for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(1):23–31(9).

Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 6th ed. Boston: Duxbury Press; 2005.

Evans JD. Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing; 1996.

Bunce C. Correlation, agreement, and bland–Altman analysis: statistical analysis of method comparison studies. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(1):4–6.

Rawstorn JC, Gant N, Warren I, Doughty RN, Lever N, Poppe KK, Maddison R. Measurement and data transmission: validity of a multi-biosensor system for real-time remote exercise monitoring among cardiac patients. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;2(1):e2.

Nazari G, MacDermid JC, Kathryn SE, Richardson J, Tang A. Reliability of Zephyr bioharness and Fitbit charge measures of heart rate and activity at rest, during the modified Canadian aerobic fitness test and recovery. J Strength Cond Res. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001842 .

Johnstone JA, Ford PA, Hughes G, Watson T, Garrett AT. BioharnessTM multivariable monitoring device: part I: validity. J Sports Sci Med. 2012a;11(3):400–8.

Kim JH, Roberge R, Powell JB, Shafer AB, Williams WJ. Measurement accuracy of heart rate and respiratory rate during graded exercise and sustained exercise in the heat using the Zephyr bioharness TM. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34:497–501.

Gatti UC, Schneider S, Migliaccio GC. Physiological condition monitoring of construction workers. Autom Constr. 2014;44:227–33.

Flanagan SD, Comstock BA, Dupont WH, Sterczala AR, Looney DP, Dombrowski DH, et al. Concurrent validity of the armour39 heart rate monitor strap. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(3):870–3.

Dolezal BA, Boland DM, Carney J, Abrazado M, Smith DL, Cooper CB. Validation of heart rate derived from a physiological status monitor-embedded compression shirt against criterion ECG. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014;11:833–9.

Smith DL, Haller JM, Dolezal BA, Cooper CB, Fehling PC. Evaluation of a wearable physiological status monitor during simulated fire fighting activities. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014;11:427–33.