Psychometric properties of Turkish version of insulin delivery device satisfaction (IDSS) scale in patients with type 2 diabetes

Liberman, 2018, Diabetes technology and the human factor, Diabetes Technol. Ther., 128, 10.1089/dia.2018.2511 Molife, 2009, Assessment of patient-reported outcomes of insulin pen devices versus conventional vial and syringe, Diabetes Technol. Ther., 11, 529, 10.1089/dia.2009.0007 Rubin, 2010, Psychometric properties of an instrument for assessing the experience of patients treated with inhaled insulin: the inhaled Insulin Treatment Questionnaire, Health Qual. Life Outcomes, 8, 32, 10.1186/1477-7525-8-32 Tanenbaum, 2017, Optimal use of diabetes devices: clinician perspectives on barriers and adherence to device use, J. Diabetes Sci. Technol., 11, 484, 10.1177/1932296816688010 Borges, 2016, Continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes human factors and usage, J. Diabetes Sci. Technol., 10, 633, 10.1177/1932296816634736 Miller, 2015, Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the US: updated data from the T1D exchange clinic registry, Diabetes Care, 38, 971, 10.2337/dc15-0078 Wong, 2014, Real-time continuous glucose monitoring among participants in the T1D exchange clinic registry, Diabetes Care, 37, 2702, 10.2337/dc14-0303 Polonsky, 2015, Development of a new measure for assessing insulin delivery device satisfaction in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, Diabetes Technol. Ther., 17, 1, 10.1089/dia.2015.0140 Grando, 2019, Patient perception and satisfaction with insulin pump system: pilot user experience survey, J. Diabetes Sci. Technol., 13, 1142, 10.1177/1932296819843146 Ozgen -Saydam, 2017, The effect of retraining on treatment success, quality of life, and metabolic parameters in patients with type 1 diabetes using an insulin pump, Med. Princ. Pract., 26, 325, 10.1159/000475935 Tosun, 2019, Do patients with diabetes use the insulin pen properly?, Afr. Health Sci., 19, 1628, 10.4314/ahs.v19i1.38 Kim, 2000, Development and testing of the hill-bone compliance to high blood pressure therapy scale, Prog. Cardiovasc. Nurs., 15, 90, 10.1111/j.1751-7117.2000.tb00211.x Diyabet Hemşireleri Derneği, hptt//www.tdhd.org/accessed, May 1, 2021. Gozum, 2003, A guide for transcultural adaptation of the scale II: psychometric characteristics and cross-cultural comparison, J. Res. Dev. Nurs., 5, 3 Polit, 2008 Cantürk, 2018, Intercultural scale adaptation stages, language and culture adaptation:updated guideline, FNJN Florence Nightingale J. Nurs., 26, 199 Messick, 1995, Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment, Educ. Meas., 14, 5, 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1995.tb00881.x Polit, 2007, Focus on research methods. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations, Res. Nurs. Health, 30, 459, 10.1002/nur.20199 Lawshe, 1975, A quantitative approach to content validity, Pers. Psychol., 28, 563, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x Tavsancil, 2010, 34 Cole, 1987, Utility of confirmatoryfactoranalysis in test validationresearch, J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 55, 584, 10.1037/0022-006X.55.4.584 Tezbaşaran, 2008, 27 Şencan, 2005, 48 Özdamar, 2013, 40 Tavakol, 2011, Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha, Int. J. Med. Educ., 2, 53, 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd Büyüköztürk, 2010, 65