Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Resilience Scale

Journal of Nursing Measurement - Tập 11 Số 1 - Trang 61-72 - 2003
MarySue V. Heilemann1, Kathryn Lee, Felix Salvador Kury
1UCLA School of Nursing, Factor Bldg., Room 5-252, Box 956919, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6919, USA.

Tóm tắt

The purpose of this study is to test the reliability and validity of a Spanish translation of the Resilience Scale (RS), which was originally created in English by Wagnild and Young (1993). A team of bilingual, bicultural translators participated in the translation process to enhance the linguistic accuracy and cultural appropriateness of the Spanish translation. As part of the convenience sample of 315 women of Mexican descent who participated in the larger study, data from 147 women who preferred to read and write in Spanish were used in this analysis. The English version of the RS consists of a 17-item “Personal Competence” subscale and an 8-item “Acceptance of Self and Life” subscale for a total of 25 items. However, two items had low item-total loadings and were removed to form a modified 23-item RS. The exploratory principal components factor analysis, varimax rotation, and subsequent goodness of fit indices were ambivalent on whether a one or two-factor solution was appropriate, but the chi-square difference test clearly demonstrated that the two-factor solution of the Spanish version was more useful in explaining variance than a one-factor solution. Internal consistency reliability was estimated with Cronbach’s alpha (α = 0.93) which was acceptable for the 23-item RS as well as its subscales. Construct validity was demonstrated by a significant positive correlation between resilience and life satisfaction (r = 0.36; p < 0.001), and a significant negative correlation between resilience and depressive symptoms (r = -0.29; p < 0.01). This analysis ultimately supports the appropriateness of the modified 23-item Spanish translation of the RS and its subscales in a sample of urban, low-income women of Mexican descent in the U.S.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson, E. & McFarlane, J. (2000).Community as partner: Theory and practice in nursing(3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.

Aroian, 1997, Journal of Nursing Measurement, 5, 151, 10.1891/1061-3749.5.2.151

Bentler, P. M. (1989).EQS structural equations program. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.

10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588

10.1177/01939450022044322

Denner, 2001, Journal of Hispanic Behavioral Sciences, 23, 3, 10.1177/0739986301231001

Flaherty, 1988, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 176, 257, 10.1097/00005053-198805000-00001

Hatcher, L. (1994).A step by step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

Heilemann, M. V. (1996).Storied health, embodied care: Mexican American women in the borderlands. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Francisco.

10.1097/00006199-200205000-00006

10.1053/apnr.2002.34141

10.1037//0022-3514.74.3.735

Neugarten, 1961, Journal of Gerontology, 16, 134, 10.1093/geronj/16.2.134

Radloff, 1977, Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385, 10.1177/014662167700100306

10.1016/0165-1781(80)90069-4

SAS Institute. (1989).SAS/STAT User's Guide(Version 6) (Vol. 1, 4th ed.). Cary, NC: Author.

10.1093/phr/115.2.205

Todd, 2000, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 119, 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00192.x

U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, Education and Social Stratification Branch. (2002, August).Detailed language spoken at home and ability to speak English for persons 5 years and over?50 languages with greatest number of speakers: United States 1990. Retrieved August 8, 2002, from http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/language/table5.txt

Wagnild, 1990, Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 22, 252

Wagnild, 1993, Journal of Nursing Measurement, 1, 165

Weech-Maldonado, R., Weidmer, B. O., Morales, L. S. & Hays, R. D. (in press). Cross-cultural adaptation or survey instruments: The CAHPS experience. In M. Cynamon & R. Kulka (Eds.),Seventh conference on health survey research methods(pp. 75?82). Hyattsville, MD: DHHS.

10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772327