Psychology's limits as a scientific discipline: A personal view

Applied and Preventive Psychology - Tập 12 - Trang 35-36 - 2007
Dean Keith Simonton1
1University of California, Davis, United States

Tài liệu tham khảo

Simonton, 1997, Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks, Psychological Review, 104, 66, 10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.66 Simonton, 1997, Foreign influence and national achievement: The impact of open milieus on Japanese civilization, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 86, 10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.86 Simonton, 1999 Simonton, 2000, Methodological and theoretical orientation and the long-term disciplinary impact of 54 eminent psychologists, Review of General Psychology, 4, 1, 10.1037/1089-2680.4.1.13 Simonton, 2002 Simonton, 2003, Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, process, and person perspectives, Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475, 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.475 Simonton, 2004 Simonton, 2004, Psychology's status as a scientific discipline: Its empirical placement within an implicit hierarchy of the sciences, Review of General Psychology, 8, 59, 10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.59 Simonton, 2006, Scientific status of disciplines, individuals, and ideas: Empirical analyses of the potential impact of theory, Review of General Psychology, 10, 98, 10.1037/1089-2680.10.2.98 Wachtel, 1980, Investigation and its discontents: Some constraints on progress in psychological research, American Psychologist, 35, 399, 10.1037/0003-066X.35.5.399 2006