Protocol for a systematic review of reporting standards of lower limb endovascular interventions in peripheral arterial disease
Systematic Reviews - 2023
Tóm tắt
Techniques and devices for the endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are continuously evolving. High-quality clinical trials limit the variation in how endovascular interventions are described, performed and reported. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the quality of reporting standards in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of endovascular lower limb interventions against the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials for Non-Pharmacologic Treatments (CONSORT-NPT) and template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) framework. Randomised trials including participants with peripheral arterial disease undergoing any infra-inguinal lower limb endovascular arterial intervention, searched from Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from inception to December 2021, will be included. All study data, including details of the procedure investigated, will be extracted in keeping with the CONSORT-NPT and TIDieR checklist. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarise general study details and reporting standards of the trials. The results will be used to inform the design of future RCTs in this area by optimising the way the interventions are described, standardised, and monitored. The systematic review will be disseminated via peer-reviewed manuscripts and presentations at relevant conferences. PROSPERO CRD42022288214
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Stoner MC, Calligaro KD, Chaer RA, Dietzek AM, Farber A, Guzman RJ, Hamdan AD, Landry GJ, Yamaguchi DJ. Reporting Standards of the Society for Vascular Surgery for Endovascular Treatment of Chronic Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disese. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64(1):e1-21.
Diehm N, Baumgartner I, Jaff M, Do D-D, Minar E, J√ºrgSchmidli, Curt Diehm, et al. A Call for Uniform Reporting Standards in Studies Assessing Endovascular Treatment for Chronic Ischaemia of Lower Limb Arteries. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(7):798–805.
Altman DG. Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. BMJ. 1996;313(7057):570–1. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7057.570.PMID:8806240;PMCID:PMC2352018.
Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A, Schulz K, Altman DG, Hill C, Gaboury I. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials?. A systematic review. Med J Aust. 2006;185(5):263–7. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00557.x. PMID: 16948622.
Boutron I, Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz KF, Ravaud P, CONSORT NPT Group. CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(1):40–7. https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-0046. Epub 2017 Jun 20. PMID: 28630973.
Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, Altman DG, et al. Better Reporting of Interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist and Guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1687.
Blencowe NS, Boddy AP, Harris A, Hanna T, Whiting P, Cook JA, Blazeby JM. Systematic review of intervention design and delivery in pragmatic and explanatory surgical randomized clinical trials. Br J Surg. 2015;102(9):1037–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9808. Epub 2015 Jun 3 PMID: 26041565.
Elliott L, Coulman K, Blencowe NS, Qureshi MI, Lee KS, Hinchliffe RJ, Mouton R. A systematic review of reporting quality for anaesthetic interventions in randomised controlled trials. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(6):832–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15294. Epub 2020 Nov 5. PMID: 33150618; PMCID: PMC8246731.
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan — a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–81.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap Consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.
Rutherford RB. Standards for Evaluating and Reporting the Results of Surgical and Percutaneous Therapy for Peripheral Arterial Disease. 1991.
Collins Dictionary. Available: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/about [Accessed 16 Jun 2019].
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
J.Vasc.Soc.G.B.Irel. 2021;1(Supp1):S1-S31. https://doi.org/10.54522/jvsgbi.2021.005