Protection against Unfair Contracts: An Economic Analysis of European Regulation
Tóm tắt
After considering the possible outcomes that may result from the interaction between potential contract parties, this paper discusses potential causes of inefficiency and investigates how the law affects conditions that would give rise to inefficiency. The analysis is focussed on the European regulation of standard form contracts. This regulation implies that ‘unfair terms’ in standard form contracts are unenforceable in Member States of the European Community, and can be interpreted as a measure to curtail the adverse selection problem that originates in the fact that contract parties may use standard form contracts. This paper investigates the welfare implication of this protection against unfair contracts.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Akerlof, G. 1970. “The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 84, 488–500.
Ayres, Ian, and Gertner, Robert 1989. “Filling Gaps in Incomplete Contracts: An Economic Theory of Default Rules.” Yale Law Journal. 99, 87–130.
Beale, Hugh 1995. “Legislative Control of Fairness: The Directive on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts.” In Beatson, Jack and Friedmann, Daniel eds., Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Charny, David 1990. “Nonlegal Sanctions in Commercial Relationships.” Harvard Law Review. 104, 373–467.
Coase, Ronald H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics. 3, 1–44.
Coase, Ronald H. 1974. “The Choice of the Institutional Framework.” Journal of Law and Economics. 17, 493–496.
Cooter, Robert, and Ulen, Thomas 1997. Law and Economics, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Craswell, Richard 1993. “Property Rules and Liability Rules in Unconscionability and Related Doctrines.” University of Chicago Law Review. 60, 1–65.
Epstein, Richard A. 1975. “Unconscionability: A Critical Reappraisal.” Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 293–315.
Geest, Gerrit de 1994. Economische analyse van het contracten-en quasi-contractenrecht, Antwerpen: Maklu.
Goldberg, Victor P. 1974. “Institutional Change and the Quasi-Invisible Hand.” Journal of Law and Economics, 17, 461–492.
Haanappel, P. P. C., and Mackaay, Ejan 1990.New Netherlands Civil Code, The Hague: Kluwer Taxation Publishers.
Hondius, Ewoud 1994. “EC Directive on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts: Towards a European Law of Contract.” Journal of Contract Law. 7, 34–52.
Hondius, Ewoud 1997. “Unfair Contract Terms: Toward a European Law Introduction.” European Review of Private Law. 5, 121–134.
Katz, Avery 1990. “The Strategic Structure of Offer and Acceptance: Game Theory and the Law of Contract Formation.” Michigan Law Review. 89, 215–295.
Miceli, Thomas J. 1997. Economics of the Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Posner, Eric A. 1995. “Contract Law in the Welfare State: a Defense of the Unconscionability Doctrine, Usury Law, and Related Limitations on the Freedom of Contract.” Journal of Legal Studies. XXIV, 283–319.
Sepe, Gianluca 1997. “National Models of European Contract Law: A Comparative Approach to the Concept of Unfairness in Directive 93/13.” Consumer Law Journal. 5, 115–122.
Shavell, Steven 1980. “Damage Measures for Breach of Contract.” Bell Journal of Economics. 11, 466–490.
Shavell, Steven 1982. “Suit, Settlement, and Trial: A Theoretical Analysis under Alternative Methods for Allocating Legal Costs.” Journal of Legal Studies. 6, 55–81.
Shavell, Steven 1987. Economic Analysis of Accident Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Trebilcock, M. J., and Dewees, D. N. 1981. “Judicial Control of Standard Form Contracts.” In Burrows, Paul, and Veljanovski, Cento G., eds., The Economic Approach to the Law, London: Butterworths.
Trebilcock, M. J. 1984. “Unequal Bargaining Power and Unconscionability.” In Ogus A. I., and Veljanovski, C. G. Readings in the Economics of Law and Regulation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ulen, Thomas 1984. “The Efficiency of Specific Performance: Toward a Unified Theory of Contract Remedies.” Michigan Law Review. 83, 341–403.
Van den Bergh, Roger 1998. “Subsidiarity as an Economic Demarcation Principle and the Emergence of European Private Law.” The Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 5, 129–152.