Prostate cancer detection with 3 T MRI: Comparison of diffusion‐weighted imaging and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in combination with T2‐weighted imaging

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Tập 31 Số 3 - Trang 625-631 - 2010
Kazuhiro Kitajima1,2, Yasushi Kaji1, Yoshitatsu Fukabori3, Ken‐Ichiro Yoshida3, Narufumi Suganuma4, Kazuro Sugimura2
1Department of Radiology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Mibu, Japan
2Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
3Department of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Mibu, Japan
4Department of Environmental Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, Japan

Tóm tắt

AbstractPurpose:To evaluate the diagnostic ability of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast‐enhanced imaging (DCEI) in combination with T2‐weighted imaging (T2WI) for the detection of prostate cancer using 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a phased‐array body coil.Materials and Methods:Fifty‐three patients with elevated serum levels of prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) were evaluated by T2WI, DWI, and DCEI prior to needle biopsy. The obtained data from T2WI alone (protocol A), a combination of T2WI and DWI (protocol B), a combination T2WI and DCEI (protocol C), and a combination of T2WI plus DWI and DCEI (protocol D) were subjected to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.Results:The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the ROC curve (Az) for region‐based analysis were: 61%, 91%, 84%, and 0.8415, respectively, in protocol A; 76%, 94%, 90%, and 0.8931, respectively, in protocol B; 77%, 93%, 89%, and 0.8655, respectively, in protocol C; and 81%, 96%, 92%, and 0.8968, respectively in protocol D. ROC analysis revealed significant differences between protocols A and B (P = 0.0008) and between protocols A and D (P = 0.0004).Conclusion:In patients with elevated PSA levels the combination of T2WI, DWI, DCEI using 3 T MRI may be a reasonable approach for the detection of prostate cancer. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;31:625–631. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

American Cancer Society.Cancer facts and figures 2008 Atlanta (GA): American Cancer Society;2008.

10.1097/00130404-200509000-00001

10.1007/s11934-004-0034-6

10.1159/000049761

10.3816/CGC.2005.n.031

10.1016/j.eururo.2005.01.015

10.1111/j.1745-7262.2005.00019.x

10.1002/jmri.20626

10.1002/jmri.20793

10.1007/s00330-006-0478-9

10.1148/radiol.2482070157

10.1002/jmri.21181

10.1080/02841850802508959

10.1002/jmri.21824

10.1016/j.acra.2004.04.013

10.1002/jmri.20829

10.1097/00004424-200411000-00005

10.1148/radiol.2441060425

10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181461d21

10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.10.002

10.3349/ymj.2008.49.5.765

10.1097/01.rct.0000185384.27765.09

10.1097/RLI.0b013e31817d0506

Cleves M, 1999, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, Stata Tech Bull, 52, 19

10.2307/2531595

10.1148/radiology.202.3.9051019

10.1007/s003300101044

10.1148/radiol.2392050949

Preziosi P, 2003, Enhancement patterns of prostate cancer in dynamic MRI, Eur Radiol, 13, 925, 10.1007/s00330-002-1703-9

10.1148/radiol.2333032098

10.1002/jmri.20251