Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation

Engineering Structures - Tập 20 Số 4-6 - Trang 452-464 - 1998
Helmut Krawinkler1, G.D.P.K. Seneviratna2
1Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
2Krawinkler, Luth and Associates, 160 Jefferson Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

FEMA, 1996, NEHRP Guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings — pre-ballot draft

Lawson, 1994, Nonlinear static pushover analysis — why, when and how?, Vol. 1, 283

Miranda, 1991, Seismic evaluation and upgrading of existing buildings

Fajfar, 1988, N2 — a method for non-linear seismic analysis of regular structures, Vol. 5, 111

Saiidi, 1981, Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of R/C structures, J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 107, 937, 10.1061/JSDEAG.0005714

Fajfar, 1992

Krawinkler, 1992, Effects of soft soils on design spectra, Vol. 10, 5841

Miranda, 1994, Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design, Earthq. Spectra, EERI, 10, 357, 10.1193/1.1585778

Nassar, 1991, Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems

Nassar, 1992, Seismic design based on strength and ductility demands, Vol. 10, 5861

Newmark, 1982, Earthquake spectra and design, EERI Monograph Series

Rahnama, 1993, Effects of soft soils and hysteresis models on seismic design spectra

Vidic, 1994, Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement, Earthq. Engng Struct. Dynam., 23, 10.1002/eqe.4290230504

Seneviratna, 1995, Evaluation of inelastic MDOF effects for seismic design

Bracci, 1997, Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation for reinforced concrete structures, J. Struct. Engng, ASCE, 123, 3, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:1(3)

Seneviratna, 1997, Strength and displacement demands for seismic design of structural walls, Vol. II, 181