Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
FEMA, 1996, NEHRP Guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings — pre-ballot draft
Lawson, 1994, Nonlinear static pushover analysis — why, when and how?, Vol. 1, 283
Miranda, 1991, Seismic evaluation and upgrading of existing buildings
Fajfar, 1988, N2 — a method for non-linear seismic analysis of regular structures, Vol. 5, 111
Saiidi, 1981, Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of R/C structures, J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 107, 937, 10.1061/JSDEAG.0005714
Fajfar, 1992
Krawinkler, 1992, Effects of soft soils on design spectra, Vol. 10, 5841
Miranda, 1994, Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design, Earthq. Spectra, EERI, 10, 357, 10.1193/1.1585778
Nassar, 1991, Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems
Nassar, 1992, Seismic design based on strength and ductility demands, Vol. 10, 5861
Newmark, 1982, Earthquake spectra and design, EERI Monograph Series
Rahnama, 1993, Effects of soft soils and hysteresis models on seismic design spectra
Vidic, 1994, Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement, Earthq. Engng Struct. Dynam., 23, 10.1002/eqe.4290230504
Seneviratna, 1995, Evaluation of inelastic MDOF effects for seismic design
Bracci, 1997, Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation for reinforced concrete structures, J. Struct. Engng, ASCE, 123, 3, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:1(3)
Seneviratna, 1997, Strength and displacement demands for seismic design of structural walls, Vol. II, 181