Properties and effects of measurement errors on 2D resistivity imaging surveying

Near Surface Geophysics - Tập 1 Số 3 - Trang 105-117 - 2003
Bing Zhou1, Torleif Dahlin2
1Department of Geology and Geophysics School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Adelaide University, South Australia, 5005, Australia
2Department of Engineering Geology Lund University Box 118 S‐221 00 Lund Sweden

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACTElectrode spacing errors and errors correlated with the magnitude of the observed potential are two key factors that affect the data quality for DC resistivity imaging measurements. This paper investigates the properties and effects of these two kinds of error on 2D resistivity imaging or inversion for practical applications. By analytic analysis and numerical simulations, the off‐line and in‐line electrode spacing errors were quantitatively estimated for all common electrode arrays (pole‐pole, pole‐dipole, pole‐bipole, Wenner, Schlumberger, dipole‐dipole, γ‐array, Wenner‐β) in 2D resistivity imaging surveys. Meanwhile, the spreading patterns of the spacing errors in the pseudosection and the possible artefacts in the imaging (inverted model) are evaluated. We show that the magnitude of the spacing errors are quite different with these arrays, being largest for dipole‐dipole, Wenner‐β and γ‐array surveys, for which a 10% in‐line spacing error may cause twice as large an error (>20%) in the observed resistance or apparent resistivity, which in turn will produce some artefacts in the inverted model. The observed potential errors obtained with the reciprocity principle and collected from different sites and with different electrode arrays, were analysed to show the properties of the potential error caused by many aspects in the field. Using logarithmic plots and error pseudosections, we found that with different electrode arrays and at different sites the potential errors demonstrate a general property, which may be regarded as a negative‐power function of potential reading. Power net transients, background telluric variation and instrument malfunction are possible sources that may cause the large errors present as outliers deviating from this function. We reaffirm the fact that the outliers are often correlated with high contact resistances for some of the electrodes used in a measurement, but this may also be caused by an unsatisfactory connection between the electrode and the cable due to, for example, dirt or oxide on the connectors. These outliers are often the main part of the errors affecting the imaging results. Furthermore, a robust inversion and a smoothness‐constrained inversion were applied to the investigation of the effects of the measurement errors. Using two real data sets, we show that the smoothness‐constrained least‐squares inversion is much more sensitive to the potential errors than the robust inversion, but the two inversion schemes produce very similar models with a high data quality. Artefacts or indefinite parts in the inverted models correlate with the distribution zones of the outliers in the potential error pseudosection.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Andersson S., 2000, Geophysical investigations of Karoo aquifers in the Nyamandhlovu area, Zimbabwe

Chambers J., 1999, 3D resistivity imaging of buried oil‐and tar‐contaminated waste deposits., European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 4, 117

10.1190/1.1440378

10.1190/1.1442303

Dahlin T., 1993, On the automation of 2D resistivity surveying for engineering and environmental applications

10.3997/1365-2397.1996014

DeGroot‐Hedlin C., 1990, Occam’s inversion to generate smooth, two‐dimensional models from magnetotelluric data., Geophysics, 38, 826

10.1111/j.1365-246X.1994.tb02122.x

JohanssonS. FriborgJ.andDahlinT.2000.New and improved monitoring systems for embankment dams. Elforsk report: 00:14.

Kennett B.L.N., 1988, Mathematical Geophysics, a Survey of Recent Developments in Seismology and Geodynamics, 139

LaBrecque D., 1996, The effects of “Occam, inversion of resistivity tomography data. Geophysics, 61, 538

10.1137/0803010

Olayinka A., 1999, Choice of the best model in 2D geoelectrical imaging: case study from a waste dump site., European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 3, 221

10.1111/j.1365-246X.1993.tb01462.x

10.1190/1.1443692

10.1190/1.1443128

10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00536.x

10.1093/mnras/211.1.111

10.1190/1.1443147

10.1137/0909062

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Near Surface Geophysics

Tập 1 Số 3

105-117

Thông tin tác giả