Proper belief revision and rationalizability in dynamic games
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Balkenborg D, Winter E (1997) A necessary and sufficient epistemic condition for playing backward induction. J Math Econ 27:325–345
Battigalli P (1996) Strategic independence and perfect Bayesian equilibria. J Econ Theory 70:201–234
Battigalli P, Siniscalchi M (1999) Hierarchies of conditional beliefs, and interactive epistemology in dynamic games. J Econ Theory 88:188–230
Battigalli P, Siniscalchi M (2002) Strong belief and forward induction reasoning. J Econ Theory 106:356–391
Ben-Porath E (1997) Rationality, Nash equilibrium and backwards induction in perfect-information games. Rev Econ Stud 64:23–46
Blume LE, Brandenburger A, Dekel E (1991a) Lexicographic probabilities and choice under uncertainty. Econometrica 59:61–79
Blume LE, Brandenburger A, Dekel E (1991b) Lexicographic probabilities and equilibrium refinements. Econometrica 59:81–98
Brandenburger A, Dekel E (1993) Hierarchies of beliefs and common knowledge. J Econ Theory 59:189–198
Mertens J-F, Zamir S (1985) Formulation of bayesian analysis for games with incomplete information. Int J Game Theory 14:1–29
Pearce D (1984) Rationalizable strategic behavior and the problem of perfection. Econometrica 52:1029–1050
Perea A (2003) Proper rationalizability and belief revision in dynamic games. Available at the author’s website: http://www.personeel.unimaas.nl/a.perea/
Reny PJ (1992b) Backward induction, normal form perfection and explicable equilibria. Econometrica 60:627–649
Reny PJ (1993) Common belief and the theory of games with perfect information. J Econ Theory 59:257–274
Samet D (1996) Hypothetical knowledge and games with perfect information. Games Econ Behav 17:230–251
Schulte O (2003) Iterated backward inference: an algorithm for proper rationalizability. In: Proceedings of TARK IX (theoretical aspects of reasoning about knowledge)