Promoting business excellence at local level: the case of Guangdong Province, China

Emerald - 2013
ElisaBarbieri1, AngelaSarcina2, LuciaBazzucchi3, Marco R.Di Tommaso3
1Based at the Department of Economic and Statistic Sciences (DIES), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
2Based at the Department of Economics and Management, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy, and the School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
3Based at the Department of Economics and Management, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between medium‐large firms' industrial performance, territorial factors and local development policies.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is an empirical econometric investigation based on a panel dataset of county‐level data, carried out in the Guangdong Province for the period 2000‐2008.FindingsResults suggest a positive and significant relationship between policies at the local level and business performance. The most important determinants of industrial performance appear to be development zones and specialized towns – on the policy side – as well as the presence of urban areas, investment in innovation and FDI. Given the complexity of the relationships, further research is called for in order to build more evidence for this and other Chinese provinces.Research limitations/implicationsThe analysis confirms the initial hypothesis that business excellence can be influenced by the specific characteristics of the territories where firms are located, among which there might be government policies aiming at local development and encouraging a better business environment.Social implicationsRelevant to the policy‐making process, results suggest that business excellence should not be viewed as only a matter of business strategies. It can be a result of territorial excellence and effective local development policies.Originality/valueIn the international debate there are very few papers testing the relationship between policies and industrial performances in China. Even fewer explore this relationship at the local level. This paper offers a unique county‐level perspective and in‐depth view on local industrial policies.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alder, S., Shao, L. and Zilibotti, F. (2012), “China's special economic zones: the effect of economic reform and industrial policy in a panel of Chinese cities”, mimeo, available at: www.amiando.com/eventResources/b/5/dTbtLtBeLLBhgw/ChinasSpecialEconomicZones_TheEffectOf.pdf (accessed July 2012).

Arvanitis, R. and Jastrabsky, E. (2006), “A regional innovation system in gestation: Guangdong”, China Perspectives, Vol. 63, pp. 1‐17.

Arvanitis, R. and Qiu, H. (2004), “R&D in universities and different institutional settings in South China: research and policy”, Final Research Report for IDRC (International Development Research Center).

Bao, S., Chang, G., Sachs, J.D. and Woo, W.T. (2002), “Geographic factors and China's regional development under market reforms, 1978–98”, China Economic Review, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 89‐111.

Barbieri, E., Di Tommaso, M.R. and Bonnini, S. (2012), “Industrial development policies and performances in Southern China: beyond the specialised industrial cluster program”, China Economic Review, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 613‐625.

Barbieri, E., Di Tommaso, M.R. and Huang, M. (2010), “Industrial development policy and innovation in southern China: government targets and firms' behaviour”, European Planning Studies, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 83‐105.

Barbieri, E., Di Tommaso, M.R. and Rubini, L. (2012), Special Economic Zones and Cluster Dynamics, International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Bellandi, M. and Di Tommaso, M.R. (2005), “The case of specialized towns in Guangdong, China”, European Planning Studies, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 707‐729.

Chu, D.K. (1998), “Synthesis of economic reforms and open policy”, in Yeung, Y. and Chu, D.K. (Eds), Guangdong: Survey of a Province Undergoing Rapid Change, Chinese University Press, Hong Kong, pp. 486‐504.

Démurger, S., Sachs, J.D., Woo, W.T., Bao, S., Chang, G. and Mellinger, A. (2002), “Geography, economic policy, and regional development in China”, Asian paper series, Center for International Development and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

Di Tommaso, M.R., Rubini, L. and Barbieri, E. (2012), Southern China: Industry, Development and Industrial Policy, Routledge, London.

Enright, M.J., Scott, E.E. and Chang, K.‐M. (2005), Regional Powerhouse: The Greater PRD and the Rise of China, John Wiley & Sons, Singapore.

Fan, C.C. (1995), “Of belts and ladders: state policy and uneven regional development in post‐Mao China”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 85 No. 3, pp. 421‐449.

Fan, C.C. and Sun, M. (2008), “Regional inequality in China, 1978‐2006”, Eurasian Geography and Economics, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 1‐20.

Ge, W. (1999), “Special economic zones and the opening of the chinese economy: some lessons for economic liberalization”, World Development, Vol. 27 No. 7, pp. 1267‐1285.

Litwack, J.M. and Qian, Y. (1998), “Balanced or unbalanced development: special economic zones as catalysts for transition”, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 1‐25.

Mody, A. and Wang, F.‐Y. (1997), “Explaining industrial growth in coastal China: economic reforms … and what else?”, The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 293‐325.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2010), OECD Territorial Reviews: Guangdong, China 2010, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Park, J.‐D. (1997), The Special Economic Zones of China and Their Impact on Its Economic Development, Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT.

Wang, J. (2010), “The economic impact of special economic zones: evidence from Chinese municipalities”, paper presented at the International Workshop on Economic Transition and Development, World Class University Project, Department of Economics, Seoul National University, Korea.

Yeung, Y.‐M., Lee, J. and Kee, G. (2009), “China's special economic zones at 30”, Eurasian Geography and Economics, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 222‐240.