Ngồi lâu và Nguy cơ mắc Bệnh Tim Mạch và Tử Vong

Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports - Tập 5 - Trang 350-357 - 2011
Wendell C. Taylor1
1Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA

Tóm tắt

Các hành vi ngồi lâu là một phân nhóm riêng biệt của các hành vi ít vận động. Chúng bao gồm việc xem tivi, sử dụng máy tính và video, ngồi trong ô tô và ngồi tại nơi làm việc. Tôi đã xem xét tài liệu khoa học từ năm 2005 đến 2010 để đánh giá tác động của việc ngồi lâu đối với tỷ lệ tử vong do bệnh tim mạch và các yếu tố nguy cơ. Tôi kết luận rằng ngồi lâu có liên quan tích cực đến các yếu tố nguy cơ bệnh tim mạch và làm tăng nguy cơ tử vong, độc lập với hoạt động thể chất. Điểm yếu của tài liệu hiện tại là sự phụ thuộc quá mức vào báo cáo tự thân về việc ngồi lâu. Ngoài ra, cần có một sự hiểu biết tốt hơn về các dấu ấn sinh học độc đáo và sự thay đổi chuyển hóa liên quan đến việc ngồi lâu, cũng như liệu việc ngồi có thay thế hoạt động thể chất cường độ nhẹ hay không. Tổng thể, các phát hiện hỗ trợ các khuyến nghị trước đây về việc xem xét các hướng dẫn và chiến lược nhằm giảm thiểu và ngắt quãng việc ngồi lâu.

Từ khóa

#ngồi lâu #bệnh tim mạch #nguy cơ tử vong #hành vi ít vận động #yếu tố nguy cơ

Tài liệu tham khảo

Xu J, Kochanek KD, Murphy SL, Tejada-Vera B. Deaths: Final data for 2007. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2010;58:1–136. Lloyd-Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D, et al. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association’s strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation. 2010;121:586–613. • Dunstan DW, Barr EL, Healy GN, et al. Television viewing time and mortality: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Circulation 2010;121:384–91. In this study, television viewing time was associated with increased CVD mortality. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:S498–504. •• Tremblay MS, Colley RC, Saunders TJ, et al. Physiological and health implications of a sedentary lifestyle. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2010;35:725–40. This article introduces the term “sedentary physiology” and presents relevant definitions, measurement procedures, major health outcomes, and future directions. Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, et al. Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003–2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:875–81. Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, et al. Objectively measured light-intensity physical activity is independently associated with 2-h plasma glucose. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1384–9. Lollgen H, Bockenhoff A, Knapp G. Physical activity and all-cause mortality: an updated meta-analysis with different intensity categories. Int J Sports Med. 2009;30:213–24. Hamilton MT, Hamilton DG, Zderic TW. Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes. 2007;56:2655–67. Zwart SR, Hargens AR, Lee SMC, et al. Lower body negative pressure treadmill exercise as a countermeasure for bed rest-induced bone loss in female identical twins. Bone. 2007;40:529–37. •• Hamilton M, Healy G, Dunstan D, et al. Too little exercise and too much sitting: inactivity physiology and the need for new recommendations on sedentary behavior. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep 2008;2:292–98. This article is one of the first reviews of the literature on the health effects of sedentary behavior. It concludes that too much sedentary behavior is hazardous to your health, and it describes underlying mechanisms for this association. •• Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2010;38:105–13. This comprehensive review presents 11 research questions to advance the science of sedentary behavior. Owen N, Sparling PB, Healy GN, et al. Sedentary behavior: emerging evidence for a new health risk. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85:1138–41. van Uffelen JG, Wong J, Chau JY, et al. Occupational sitting and health risks: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39:379–88. •• Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Craig CL, Bouchard C. Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009;41:998–1005. In this study of 17,013 adults, a dose-response association was found between sitting time and CVD mortality, independent of leisure time physical activity. Patel AV, Bernstein L, Deka A, et al. Leisure time spent sitting in relation to total mortality in a prospective cohort of US adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172:419–29. •• Warren TY, Barry V, Hooker SP, et al. Sedentary behaviors increase risk of cardiovascular disease mortality in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010;42:879–85. In men, time spent riding in a car and watching television were positively associated with CVD mortality. High levels of physical activity were associated with lower rates of CVD mortality, even with high levels of prolonged sitting. Ekelund U, Brage S, Griffin SJ, Wareham NJ. Objectively measured moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity but not sedentary time predicts insulin resistance in high-risk individuals. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1081–6. •• Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, et al. Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk. Diabetes Care 2008;31:661–66. The findings of this study indicate that interrupting periods of prolonged sitting (ie, breaks in prolonged sitting) reduces metabolic risk. Aadahl M, Kjaer M, Jorgensen T. Influence of time spent on TV viewing and vigorous intensity physical activity on cardiovascular biomarkers: the Inter 99 study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007;14:660–5. Bertrais S, Beyeme-Ondoua JP, Czernichow S, et al. Sedentary behaviors, physical activity, and metabolic syndrome in middle-aged French subjects. Obes Res. 2005;13:936–44. • Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Owen N, et al. Associations of TV viewing and physical activity with the metabolic syndrome in Australian adults. Diabetologia 2005;48:2254–61. In a population-based, cross-sectional study of 6241 adults, increased television viewing time was associated with an increased prevalence of the metabolic syndrome. Ford ES, Kohl III HW, Mokdad AH, Ajani UA. Sedentary behavior, physical activity, and the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults. Obes Res. 2005;13:608–14. Gao X, Nelson ME, Tucker KL. Television viewing is associated with prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Hispanic elders. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:694–700. Hardy LL, Denney-Wilson E, Thrift AP, et al. Screen time and metabolic risk factors among adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164:643–9. Sisson SB, Camhi SM, Church TS, et al. Leisure time sedentary behavior, occupational/domestic physical activity, and metabolic syndrome in U.S. men and women. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2009;7:529–36. Wijndaele K, Duvigneaud N, Matton L, et al. Sedentary behaviour, physical activity and a continuous metabolic syndrome risk score in adults. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63:421–9. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 2005;112:2735–52. Churilla JR, Fitzhugh EC, Thompson DL. The metabolic syndrome: how definition impacts the prevalence and risk in U.S. adults: 1999–2004 NHANES. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2007;5:331–41. Grundy SM, Brewer Jr HB, Cleeman JI, et al. Definition of metabolic syndrome: report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association conference on scientific issues related to definition. Circulation. 2004;109:433–8. Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. Metabolic syndrome—a new world-wide definition. A Consensus Statement from the International Diabetes Federation. Diabet Med. 2006;23:469–80. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998;15:539–53. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486–97. National Cholesterol Education Program (U.S.). Expert Panel on Detection Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults.: Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (adult treatment panel III): final report. [Washington, D.C.]: The Program; 2002. •• Zagol BW, Krasuski RA. Effect of motorized scooters on quality of life and cardiovascular risk. Am J Cardiol 2010;105:672–6. This study investigated the possible adverse effects of regular motorized scooter use. The authors concluded that physicians should carefully weigh the risks before approving motorized scooter use. The health concerns include long-term increases in cardiovascular risk. • Beunza JJ, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Ebrahim S, et al. Sedentary behaviors and the risk of incident hypertension: the SUN Cohort. Am J Hypertens 2007;20:1156–62. In this study of adults, interactive sedentary behaviors (driving and computer use) were independent risk factors for incident hypertension, whereas non-interactive sedentary behaviors (television viewing and sleeping) were not associated with incident hypertension. Pardee PE, Norman GJ, Lustig RH, et al. Television viewing and hypertension in obese children. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:439–43. • Schneider M, Dunton GF, Cooper DM. Media use and obesity in adolescent females. Obesity 2007;15:2328–35. In this study of female adolescents, interactive media use (Internet surfing and video games) was associated with body fat percentage and body mass index, whereas non-interactive media use (watching television or a movie, reading/homework) was not. Shields M, Tremblay MS. Sedentary behaviour and obesity. Health Rep. 2008;19:19–30. American Academy of Pediatrics CoPE. Children, adolescents, and television. Pediatrics. 2001;107:423–6. Healthy People 2020: physical activity. Available at http://healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicid=33. Accessed January 2011. Bridging the gap: connecting environment, economy, and community. Walking school bus. Available at http://www.bridgingthegap.org/egap.php?id=256. Accessed January 2011. The walking school bus: combining safety, fun and the walk to school. Available at http://www.saferoutesinfo.org/guide/walking_school_bus/index.cfm. Accessed January 2011. Lubans DR, Boreham CA, Kelly P, Foster CE. The relationship between active travel to school and health-related fitness in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Beh Nutr Phy Act. 2011; http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/8/1/5. Active living research brief: designing for active transportation. Available at www.activelivingresearch.org. Accessed January 2011. Wang Y, Tuomilehto J, Jousilahti P, et al. Occupational, commuting, and leisure-time physical activity in relation to heart failure among Finnish men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1140–8. Yancey AK. Instant recess: building a fit nation 10 minutes at a time. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2010. Yancey AK, McCarthy WJ, Taylor WC, et al. The Los Angeles Lift Off: a sociocultural environmental change intervention to integrate physical activity into the workplace. Prev Med. 2004;38:848–56. Research reflections. Leeds Metropolitan University 2006 (January 22). Available at www.leedsmet.ac.uk/the_news/research_reflections/. Accessed January 2011. Active voice: walking at the desk—workplace innovation fosters better health. Available at http://www.multibriefs.com/briefs/acsm/active8-3.htm. Accessed December 2010. Taylor WC. Transforming work breaks to promote health. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29:461–5. Taylor WC. Booster breaks: an easy-to-implement workplace policy designed to improve employee health, increase productivity, and lower health care costs. J Workplace Behav Health. 2011;26:70–84. Taylor WC, Pepkin KL. Booster Breaks: improving employee health one break at a time. Houston: Karrick Press; 2010. •• Taylor WC, Shegog R, Chen V, et al. The Booster Break program: description and feasibility test of a worksite physical activity daily practice. Work 2010;37:433–43. This study demonstrated that the Booster Break program is feasible in a worksite setting. After 117 sessions conducted over a 6-month period, Booster Break participants had reductions in cardiovascular risk factors, specifically high-density lipoprotein levels and weight. Lombard WR, Goebel M. The effects of Booster Breaks during a sedentary night shift on physiological, psychomotor, psycho-physiological, and cognitive performance over a 3 night shift habituation phase. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the Ergonomics Society of South Africa (CD-ROM), 4th-6th November 2009 in Port Elizabeth. Edited by A. Thatcher, S. Zschernack, A. Todd and S. Davies. 60–2. Weight-control information network, an information service of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Available at http://win.niddk.nih.gov/publications/better_health.htm. Accessed April 2011.