Projective Anthropomorphism as a Dialogue with Ourselves
Tóm tắt
This paper introduces an original concept (projective anthropomorphism) towards exploring a psychological dimension that is irreducible to the forms of anthropomorphism investigated in both cognitive science and social robotics. Projective anthropomorphism is an unconscious bias towards anticipating humanlike characteristics in robots. An overview of the variety of ways in which projection has been conceptualised in psychology and psychoanalysis is provided before discussing implications for theorising projective anthropomorphism. The proposed concept alludes to the projection of existential anxieties and desires onto myths, legends, linguistic tropes, and science-fiction motifs of humanoid automata. Such motifs and their associated narratives populate contemporary popular culture, and feed into social representations of robots. The importance of considering projective anthropomorphism lies in the extent to which its phenomena channel people’s expectations and attitudes towards technological artefacts, as well as steering technological possibilities.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Jones RA (2015) Personhood and social robotics. Routledge, London
Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo JT (2007) On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol Rev 114:864–886
Zanatto D, Patacchiola M, Cangelosi A, Goslin J (2019) Generalisation of anthropomorphic stereotype. Int J Soc Robot. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00549-4
Złotowski J, Sumioka H, Eyssel F, Nishio S, Bartneck C, Ishiguro H (2018) Model of dual anthropomorphism: the relationship between the media equation effect and implicit anthropomorphism. Int J Soc Robot 10:701–714
Turkle S (2011) Alone together. Basic Books, New York
Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot Auton Syst 42:143–166
University of Hertfordshire (2019) Kaspar the social robot. www.herts.ac.uk/kaspar/the-social-robot. Accessed on 3 August 2019
Yao M (2017). Could your child’s best friend be a robot? www.forbes.com/sites/mariyayao/2017/04/06/could-your-childs-best-friend-be-a-robot/#5c20b5a86dbb. Accessed 22 August 2017
Cog Project (n.d.) Overview. www.ai.mit.edu/projects/humanoid-robotics-group/cog/overview.html. Accessed on 2 August 2019
Brooks RA, Breazeal C, Marjanović M, Scassellati B, Williamson MM (1999) The cog project: building a humanoid robot. In: Nehaniv CL (eds) Computation for metaphors, analogy, and agents CMAA 1998. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1562. Springer, Berlin
Brooks RA (2000) Will robots rise up and demand their rights? Time 155(25):86
Baumeister RF, Dale K, Sommer KL (1998) Freudian defense mechanisms and empirical findings in modern social psychology: reaction formation, projection, displacement, undoing, isolation, sublimation, and denial. J Pers 66:1081–1124
Sandler J, Perlow M (1989) Internalization and externalization. In: Sandler J (ed) Projection, identification, projective identification. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 1–12
Jung CG (1951) Aion. In: The collected works of C G Jung, vol 9 pt. II. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Sandler J (1989) The concept of projective identification. In: Sandler J (ed) Projection, identification, projective identification. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 13–26
Frank LK (1939) Projective methods for the study of personality. J Psychol 8:389–413
Gordon RM, Rudd-Barnard A, Smith-Wexler L (2018) House-tree-person test. In: Kreutzer JS, De Luca J, Caplan B (eds) Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology. Springer, Cham
Lilienfeld SO, Wood JM, Garb HN (2000) The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychol Sci Publ Interest 1:27–66
McCully RS (1987) Jung and Rorschach. Spring Publications, Dallas
Taylor RP, Martin TP, Montgomery RD, Smith JH, Micolich AP, Boydston C et al (2017) Seeing shapes in seemingly random spatial patterns: fractal analysis of Rorschach inkblots. PLoS ONE 12(2):e0171289. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171289
Turkle S (2006) New complicities for companionship: a nascent robotics culture. Talk Given at Stanford University, Stanford
Murray HA (1943) Thematic apperception test manual. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Semeonoff B (1976) Projective techniques. Wiley, London
Fleming P (2019) Robots and organization studies: why robots might not want to steal your job. Organ Stud 40:23–37
Jung CG (1921) Psychological types. In: Collected works of C. G. Jung, vol 6. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Fromm E (1956) The sane society. Routledge, London
Rank O (1971) The double. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill
Rochat P (2003) Five levels of self-awareness as they unfold early in life. Conscious Cogn 12:717–731
Lacan J (1977) Ecrits: a selection. Tavistock, London
Soffer O, Adovasio JM, Hyland DC (2000) The “Venus” figurines textiles, basketry, gender, and status in the upper Palaeolithic. Curr Anthropol 41:511–537