Progression to type 2 diabetes in women with a known history of gestational diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ, The - Trang m1361
Elpida Vounzoulaki1,2, Kamlesh Khunti1,2, Sophia Abner1,2, Bee K. Tan3, Melanie J. Davies1, Clare Gillies1,2
1Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
2National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration-East Midlands, Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
3Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

Tóm tắt

AbstractObjectiveTo estimate and compare progression rates to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and healthy controls.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesMedline and Embase between January 2000 and December 2019, studies published in English and conducted on humans.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesObservational studies investigating progression to T2DM. Inclusion criteria were postpartum follow-up for at least 12 months, incident physician based diagnosis of diabetes, T2DM reported as a separate outcome rather than combined with impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance, and studies with both a group of patients with GDM and a control group.ResultsThis meta-analysis of 20 studies assessed a total of 1 332 373 individuals (67 956 women with GDM and 1 264 417 controls). Data were pooled by random effects meta-analysis models, and heterogeneity was assessed by use of the I2 statistic. The pooled relative risk for the incidence of T2DM between participants with GDM and controls was estimated. Reasons for heterogeneity between studies were investigated by prespecified subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots and, overall, studies were deemed to have a low risk of bias (P=0.58 and P=0.90). The overall relative risk for T2DM was almost 10 times higher in women with previous GDM than in healthy controls (9.51, 95% confidence interval 7.14 to 12.67, P<0.001). In populations of women with previous GDM, the cumulative incidence of T2DM was 16.46% (95% confidence interval 16.16% to 16.77%) in women of mixed ethnicity, 15.58% (13.30% to 17.86%) in a predominantly non-white population, and 9.91% (9.39% to 10.42%) in a white population. These differences were not statistically significant between subgroups (white v mixed populations, P=0.26; white v non-white populations, P=0.54). Meta-regression analyses showed that the study effect size was not significantly associated with mean study age, body mass index, publication year, and length of follow-up.ConclusionsWomen with a history of GDM appear to have a nearly 10-fold higher risk of developing T2DM than those with a normoglycaemic pregnancy. The magnitude of this risk highlights the importance of intervening to prevent the onset of T2DM, particularly in the early years after pregnancy.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42019123079.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2337/dc19-S002

International Diabetes Federation . IDF Diabetes Atlas - 2019. International Diabetes Federation, 2019.

10.1007/s00592-017-0986-x

10.2105/AJPH.2005.065722

10.2337/dc09-0900

10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fe424b

10.2337/dc07-0618

10.1002/pdi.1559

10.3109/01443615.2013.826639

10.1016/j.diabres.2012.01.015

10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.001

10.2337/diacare.25.10.1862

10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5

10.1016/j.dsx.2017.05.002

10.2337/dc07-s206

10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023014

World Health Organization . Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. World Health Organization, 2011.

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006

10.1001/jama.283.15.2008

Higgins JPT Green S . Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.

World Health Organization . Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications: report of a WHO consultation. Part 1, Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. World Health Organization, 1999.

10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z

10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2

Altman DG . Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, 1997.

10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01767.x

10.3109/09513590.2015.1032926

10.1016/j.diabres.2017.04.003

10.1186/1471-2393-14-296

10.1007/s00125-018-4775-z

10.1503/cmaj.080012

10.1007/s00125-012-2549-6

10.1007/s00125-005-0058-6

10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02306.x

10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02995.x

10.2337/diacare.26.4.1199

10.1046/j.0001-6349.2001.00000.x

10.1080/14767058.2017.1321630

10.1371/journal.pmed.1002488

10.1371/journal.pone.0179647

10.1016/j.diabres.2007.06.002

10.2337/dc06-1816

10.1016/j.diabres.2008.02.017

10.1046/j.1471-0528.2002.01373.x

10.1016/j.diabres.2009.05.001

10.1007/s00125-014-3403-9

10.2337/dc10-0351

10.1002/oby.20940

10.1089/jwh.2011.3318

10.1186/s12933-019-0881-6

10.1530/EJE-16-0952

10.1111/apt.14023

10.2337/dc07-s201

10.1136/bmj.i4919

10.2337/diacare.22.6.933

10.3399/bjgp14X676410

10.3390/jcm8010004

10.1097/GCO.0000000000000127