Profile of attendance at a maternity hospital emergency room

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 169 - Trang 122-124 - 2000
J. Morgan1, W. Cullen2, G. Bury2, M. J. Turner3
1Eastern Regional Vocational Training Programme in General Practice, University College Dublin, Ireland
2Department of General Practice, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
3Coombe Women's Hospital, Dublin

Tóm tắt

Direct presentations to secondary care that could have been managed in primary care have been the subject of much study. Social factors may influence the decision to present directly to secondary care services. To determine the profile and primary care service use of patients attending a maternity hospital emergency room (ER). A self-administered, questionnaire based, cross-sectional study was performed over a period of one month. Of 350 patients attending the ER, 343 (98%) completed a questionnaire. Mean age of patients attending was 28 years (range 16–65). Thirty seven per cent were eligible for free medical care and 39% belonged to socio-economic group six. Fifty nine per cent attended outside normal hours, 31% had a female general practitioner (GP) and 38% were referred by a GP to the ER. Twenty eight per cent had seen their GP in the previous three days, 31% had consulted a GP with their current problem and 58% felt “comfortable” or “very comfortable” attending their GP with a gynaecological complaint. This study indicates that the service is responsible for a considerable workload, with a low level of use of primary care services by those attending.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Keirse MJNC. Interaction between primary and secondary care during pregnancy. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC (eds). Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989. Murphy AW, Plunkett PK, Bury G, Leonard C, Walsh J, Lynam F, Johnson Z. Effect of patients seeing a general practitioner on their subsequent reattendance: cohort study.Br Med J 2000; 320: 903–4. Dale J, Green J, Reid F, Glucksman E, Higgs R. Primary care in the accident and emergency department. II: Comparison of general practitioners and hospital doctors.Br Med J 1995; 311: 427–30. Murphy AW. Inappropriate attenders at accident and emergency departments. I: Definition, incidence and reasons for reattendance.Fam Pract 1998; 15: 23–32. Jones C, McGowan A. Self referral to an accident and emergency department.Br Med J 1989; 298: 1519. Coombe Women’s Hospital. Annual Clinical Report. 1998. Central Statistics Office. National Population Census 1996. Dublin, 1996. McAuliffe F, Hoey M, Geary M. The National Maternity Hospital Casualty Department — a review.Ir Med J 1997; 90(1): 19. General Medical Services (Payments) Board. Annual Report. 1997. National General Practice Survey 1997. Dublin: The Irish College of General Practitioners, 1997. Klein M, Zander L. The role of the family practitioner in maternity care. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC (eds). Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989. Smith LFP, Jewell D. Contribution of general practitioners to hospital intrapartum care in maternity units in England and Wales in 1988.Br Med J 1991; 302: 13–6. Brown DJ, Opinions of general practitioners in Nottinghamshire about provision of intrapartum care,Br Med J 1994; 309: 777–9. Smith LFP. The provision of obstetric care by general practitioners in the south western region of England.Br J Gen Pract 1994; 44: 255–8. Department of Health. Changing childbirth. (Part I). Report of the Expert Maternity Group. London: HMSO, 1993. Reid ME, McIlwaine GM. Consumer opinion of hospital antenatal clinics.Soc Sci Med 1981; 14(A): 363–8. O’Brien M, Smith C. Women’s views and experiences of antenatal care.Practitioner 1981; 225: 123–5. Smith LFP. Views of pregnant women on the involvement of general practitioners in maternity care.Br J Gen Pract 1996; 46: 101–4. Taylor A. Maternity services: the consumers’ view.J R Coll Gen Pract 1986; 36: 157–60. Smith LFP. Should general practitioners have any role in maternity care in the future?Br J Gen Pract 1996; 46: 243–7. Fleissig A, Kroll D, McCarthy. General practitioners views on the implementation of community-led maternity care in South Camden, London.Br J Gen Pract 1997; 47: 45–6. Fenwick N, Morgan M, McKenzie C, Wolfe C. General practitioners attitudes to the development of midwifery group practices.Br J Gen Pract 1998; 48: 1395–8. Rubin H, Gonde K, Rogers W et al. Patients ratings of outpatient visits in different practice settings.JAMA 1993; 270: 835–40. Khayat K, Salter B. Patient satisfaction surveys as a market research tool for GPs.Br J Gen Pract 1994; 44: 215–9. Williams SJ, Caiman M. Key determinants of consumer satisfaction with general practice.Fam Pract 1991; 8: 237–42. Philips D, Brooks F. Age differences in women’s verdicts on the quality of primary health care services.Br J Gen Pract 1998; 48: 1151–4.