Processing Conditional Perfection in Promises and Threats: The Role of Negation, Clause Order and Incentive

Atlas, J., & Levinson, S. (1981). If-clefts, informativeness, and logical form. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 1–61). Academic Press.

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss

Bonnefon, J.-F., Feeney, A., & Villejoubert, G. (2009). When some is actually all: Scalar inferences in face-threatening contexts. Cognition, 112(2), 249–258.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge University Press.

Dieussaert, K., Schaeken, W., & d’Ydewalle, G. (2002). The relative contribution of content and context factors on the interpretation of conditionals. Experimental Psychology, 49, 181–195.

Evans, J., & Handley, S. (1999). The role of negation in conditional inference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52(3), 739–769.

Evans, J., & Newstead, S. (1977). Language and reasoning: A study of temporal factors. Cognition, 5, 265–283.

Evans, J., & Twyman-Musgrove, J. (1998). Conditional reasoning with inducements and advice. Cognition, 69, B11–B16.

Evans, J., Clibbens, J., & Rood, B. (1995). Bias in conditional inference: Implications for mental models and mental logic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 644–670.

Farr, M.-C. (2011). The presence of Conditional perfection Experimental evidence. In Reich, I., Horch, E., Pauly, D. (Eds). Proceedings of Sinn and Bedeutung, (vol. 15, pp. 225–239). Universaar Saarland University Press.

Fillenbaum, S. (1975). If: Some uses. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 37, 245–260.

Fillenbaum, S. (1976). Inducements: On the phrasing and logic of conditional promises, threats, and warnings. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 38, 231–250.

Fillenbaum, S. (1977). A condition on plausible inducements. Language and Speech, 20(2), 136–141.

Fillenbaum, S. (1978). How to do some things with IF. In J. W. Cotton & R. L. Klatzky (Eds.), Semantic factors in cognition (pp. 169–214). Erlbaum.

Fischer, O., & Nänny, M. (2001). The motivated sign. Iconicity in language and literature. Amsterdam/Philadelphia.

Franke, M. (2009). Signal to act: Game theory in pragmatics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.

Geis, M., & Zwicky, A. (1971). On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry, 2, 561–566.

Geurts, B. (2010). Quantity implicatures. Cambridge University Press.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3 (pp. 43–58). Academic Press.

Herburger, E. (2015). Conditional perfection: The truth and the whole truth. Proceedings of SALT, 25, 615–635.

Horn, L. (2000). From if to iff: Conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 289–326.

Lilje, G. W. (1972). Uninvited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry, 3, 540–542.

Matsumoto, Y. (1995). The Conversational Condition on Horn Scales”. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, 21–60.

Moldovan, A. (2013). Denying the antecedent and conditional perfection again. In OSSA Conference Archive (vol. 117).

Newstead, S., Ellis, C., Evans, J., & Dennis, I. (1997). Conditional reasoning with realistic material. Thinking and Reasoning, 3, 49–96.

Oaksford, M., Chater, N., & Larkin, J. (2000). Probabilities and polarity biases in conditional inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(4), 883–899.

Pekelis, O. (2017). Uslovnye pridatočnye [Russian conditionals]. Materialy plja proekta korpusnogo opisanija russkoj grammatiki [Materials for the project of corpus description of the Russian grammar]. Unpublished article. URL: http://rusgram.ru.

Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., and R Core Team (2020). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1–151, URL: https://CRAN.

R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. URL: https://www.R-project.org/.

Rubin, J., & Lewicki, R. (1973). A three-factor experimental analysis of promises and threats. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3(3), 240–257.

Schroyens, W., Schaeken, W., Verschueren, N., & D’Ydewalle, G. (1999). Conditional reasoning with negations: Matching bias and implicit versus explicit affirmation or denial. Psychologica Belgica, 39(4), 235–258.

Searle, J. (1979). Expression and meaning. Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J., & Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge University Press.

Van Canegem-Ardijns, I., & Van Belle, W. (2008). Conditionals and Types of Conditional Perfection. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 349–376.

Van Tiel, B., & Schaeken, W. (2016). Processing conversational implicatures: Alternatives and counterfactual reasoning. Cognitive Science, 41, 1119–1154.

Van der Auwera, J. (1997). Pragmatics in the last quarter century: The case of conditional perfection. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 261–274.

Verbrugge, S., Dieussaert, K., Schaeken, W., & Van Belle, W. (2004). Promise is debt, threat another matter: The effect of credibility on the interpretation of conditional promises and threats. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 106–112.

Von Fintel, K. (2001). Conditional strengthening. Unpublished manuscript. MIT.