Procedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the research evidence
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bennett, S., Denning, R., Mazerolle, L., & Stocks, B. (2009). Procedural justice: A systematic literature search and technical report to the National Policing Improvement Agency. Brisbane: ARC Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security.
Berrien, J., & Winship, C. (2002). An umbrella of legitimacy: Boston's Police Department – Ten Point Coalition Collaboration. In G. S. Katzmann (Ed.), Securing our children's future (pp. 200–228). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
*Bond, C. E. W., & Gow, D. J. (1997). Policing the beat: The experience in Toowoomba, Queensland. In R. Homel (Ed.), Crime prevention studies, Vol. 7. Policing for prevention: Reducing crime, public intoxication and injury (pp. 154–173). Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex: Wiley.
Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: a dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 102(1), 119–170.
*Dai, M. (2007). Procedural justice during police-citizen encounters. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinatti). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (UMI Number: 3280116).
Dai, M. Y., Frank, J., & Sun, I. (2011). Procedural justice during police-citizen encounters: the effects of process-based policing on citizen compliance and demeanor. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(2), 159–168.
*Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999a). National evaluation of weed and seed: Akron, Ohio research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_national/akron-oh.pdf
*Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999b). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Hartford, Connecticut research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_national/hartford-ct.pdf
*Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999c). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Las Vegas, Nevada research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_national/lasvegas-nv.pdf
*Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999d). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Manatee and Sarasota Counties, Florida research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_national/manatee-sarasota-fl.pdf
*Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999e). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_national/pittsburgh-pa.pdf
*Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999f). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Salt Lake City, Utah research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_national/saltlakecity-ut.pdf
*Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999g). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Seattle, Washington research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_national/seattle-wa.pdf
*Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999h). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Shreveport, Louisiana research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_national/shreveport-la.pdf
*Eckert, R. (2009). Community policing as procedural justice: An examination of Baltimore residents after the implementation of a community policing strategy. (Master’s thesis, Villanova University). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (UMI Number: 1462400)
Fischer, R., Harb, C., Al-Sarraf, S., & Nashabe, O. (2008). Support for resistance among Iraqi students: an exploratory study. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30(2), 167–175.
Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2010). Four ingredients: new recipes for procedural justice in Australian policing. Policing, 4(4), 403–410.
*Hall, P.A. (1987). Neighborhood Watch and participant perceptions. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (UMI Number: 0560502).
Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Toronto: Academic Press.
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558.
Hinds, L., & Murphy, K. (2007). Public satisfaction with police: using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40(1), 27–42.
*Hinds, L. (2009). Youth, police legitimacy and informal contact. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 24, 10–21.
*Holland, R. C. (1996). Informal resolution: dealing with complaints against police in a manner satisfactory to the officer and the complainant. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 20(1), 83–93.
Home Office (2011). Crime in England and Wales: Quarterly update to September 2010. London: Author.
Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2010). What is trust and confidence in the police? Policing, 4(3), 241–248.
Jonathan-Zamir, T., & Weisburd, D. (2009). Does police performance increase in importance for the public during times of security threats, and do evaluations of procedural justice decline in importance? Findings from a quasi-experimental study of antecedents of police legitimacy in Israel. Jerusalem: Hebrew University.
*Kerstetter, W. A., & Rasinski, K. A. (1994). Opening a window into police internal affairs: impact of procedural justice reform on third-party attitudes. Social Justice Research, 7(2), 107–127.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis (Vol. 49). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
*McGarrell, E. F., & Chermak, S. (2004). Strategic approaches to reducing firearms violence: Final report on the Indianapolis violence reduction partnership. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Mastrofski, S.D. (2009). Systematic social observation and legitimacy policing. Presentation.
Mastrofski, S. D., Snipes, J. B., & Supina, A. E. (1996). Compliance on demand: the public's response to specific police requests. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33(3), 269–305.
Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Antrobus, E., & Eggins, E. (2012). Procedural justice, routine encounters and citizen perceptions of police: main findings from the Queensland Community Engagement Trial (QCET). Journal of Experimental Criminology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s11292-012-9160-1 .
Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Legitimacy in policing. Campbell Collaboration Library of Systematic Reviews. http://campbellcollaboration.org/lib/project/141/ .
McCluskey, J. D. (2003). Police requests for compliance: Coercive and procedurally just tactics. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.
McCluskey, J. D., Mastrofski, S. D., & Parks, R. B. (1999). To acquiesce or rebel: predicting citizen compliance with police requests. Police Quarterly, 2(4), 389–416.
Murphy, K. (2009). Public satisfaction with police: the importance of procedural justice and police performance in police-citizen encounters. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 42(2), 159–178.
Murphy, K., & Cherney, A. (2012). Understanding cooperation with police in a diverse society. British Journal of Criminology, 52, 181–201.
*Murphy, K., Hinds, L., & Fleming, J. (2008). Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing and Society, 18(2), 136–155.
*Panetta, M. J. (2000). Identifying and assessing citizen perceptions of police and community policing practices. (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (UMI Number: 9971979)
Reisig, M. D., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. G. (2007). The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(8), 1005–1028.
Reiss, A. J. (1971). The police and the public. New Haven: Yale University Press.
*Ren, L., Cao, L., Lovrich, N., & Gaffney, M. (2005). Linking confidence in police with the performance of the police: community policing can make a difference. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 55–66.
*Robinson, A. L., & Chandek, M. S. (2000). Philosophy into practice? Community policing units and domestic violence victim participation. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 23(3), 280–302.
*Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., Atkinson, H., Chapman, B., Dignan, J., Howes, M., et al. (2007). Restorative justice: The views of victims and offenders. Ministry of Justice Research Series (3). United Kingdom: Ministry of Justice.
*Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Barnes, G. C., Braithwaite, J., Inkpen, N., & Teh, M. M. (1998). Experiments in restorative policing: A progress report on the Canberra Reintegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE). Canberra: Australian Federal Police and Australian National University.
*Singer, L. (2004). Reassurance policing: An evaluation of the local management of community safety. Home Office Research Studies (Vol. 228). London: Home Office.
*Skogan, W.G., & Steiner, L. (2004). CAPS at Ten: Community policing in Chicago - An evaluation of Chicago's alternative policing strategy. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Community Policing Evaluation Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.ipr.northwestern.edu/publications/policing_papers/Yr10-CAPSeval.pdf
Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice for legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37(3), 513–548.
Sutton, A. J., Duval, S. J., Tweedie, R. L., Abrams, K. R., & Jones, D. R. (2000). Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 320, 1574–1577.
Tankebe, J. (2009). Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: does procedural fairness matter? Criminology, 47, 1265–1293.
*Tuffin, R., Morris, J., & Poole, A. (2006). An evaluation of the impact of the National Reassurance Policing programme. Home Office Research Study 296. London: Development and Statistics Directorate, Home Office Research.
Tyler, T. R. (2001). Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: what do majority and minority group members want from legal authorities? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 215–235.
Tyler, T. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 84–99.
Tyler, T. R. (2005). Policing in black and white: ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly, 8(3), 322–342.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.
Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.
Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law. New York: Russell Sage.
Tyler, T.R. & Murphy, K. (2011). Procedural justice, police legitimacy and cooperation with police: A new paradigm for policing. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security Briefing Paper. May 2011.
Tyler, T. R., Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Barnes, G. C., & Woods, D. J. (2007). Reintegrative shaming, procedural justice, and recidivism: the engagement of offenders' psychological mechanisms in the Canberra RISE drinking-and-driving experiment. Law and Society Review, 41(3), 553–585.
Tyler, T. R., Schulhofer, S., & Huq, A. Z. (2010). Legitimacy and deterrence rffects in conterterrorism policing: a study of Muslim Americans. Law & Society Review, 44(2), 365–402.
Tyler, T. R., & Wakslak, C. J. (2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. Criminology, 42(2), 253–281.
*Weisburd, D., Morris, N. A., & Ready, J. (2008). Risk-focused policing at places: an experimental evaluation. Justice Quarterly, 25(1), 163–200.
Wells, L. E. (2007). Type of contact and evaluations of police officers: the effects of procedural justice across three types of police–citizen contacts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(6), 612–621.
*Young, R., Hoyle, C., Cooper, K., & Hill, R. (2005). Informal resolution of complaints against the police: a quasi-experimental test of restorative justice. Criminal Justice, 5(3), 279–317.
*Zevitz, R.G., Palazzari, T., Frinzi, J.N., & Mallinger, A. (1997). Milwaukee Weed and Seed program evaluation final report. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies_local/milwaukee.pdf