Probing recursion
Cognitive Processing - 2014
Tóm tắt
The experimental probing of recursion in human performance is faced with non-trivial problems. Here, I analyse three case studies from the literature and argue that they tell us little about the underlying mental processes at play within each of these domains: (a) the question of whether experimental participants employ recursive rules in parsing artificial strings of nonsense syllables; (b) the role of self-embedded structures in reasoning and general cognition; and (c) the reputed connection between structural features of a given object and the corresponding, recursive rules needed to represent/generate it. I then outline what a recursive process would actually look like and how one could go about probing its presence in human behaviour, concluding, however, that recursive processes in performance are very unlikely, at least as far as fast, mandatory, and automatic modular processes are concerned.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abelson H, Sussman GJ (1996) Structure and interpretation of computer programs. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (With J. Sussman)
Bahlmann J, Schubotz RI, Friederici AD (2008) Hierarchical artificial grammar processing engages Broca’s area. NeuroImage 42:525–534
Bever TG (1970) The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In: Hayes JR (ed) Cognition and the development of language. Wiley-Blackwell, London, pp 279–362
Bever TG, Poeppel D (2010) Analysis by synthesis: a (re-)emerging program of research for language and vision. Biolinguistics 4(2–3):174–200
Boolos G (1971) The iterative conception of set. J Philos 68(8):215–231
Brainerd WS, Landweber LH (1974) Theory of computation. Wiley, New York, NY
Carruthers P (2002) The cognitive functions of language. Behav Brain Sci 25:657–726
Cherubini P, Johnson-Laird PN (2004) Does everyone love everyone? The psychology of iterative reasoning. Think Reason 10(1):31–53
Chomsky N (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Chomsky N (2000) Linguistics and brain science. In: Marantz A, Miyashita Y, O’Neil W (eds) Image, language, brain. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 13–28
Chomsky N (2006) Language and mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Chomsky N (2008) On phases. In: Freidin R, Otero CP, Zubizarreta ML (eds) Foundational issues in linguistic theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 133–166
Chomsky N, Miller GA (1963) Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages. In: Luce RD, Bush RR, Galanter E (eds) Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol 2. Wiley, New York, pp 269–322
Church A (1936) An unsolvable problem of elementary number theory. In: Davis M (ed) The undecidable. Dover Publications Inc., New York, pp 88–107
Corballis M (2007) Recursion, language and starlings. Cognit Sci 31(4):697–704
Corballis M (2011) The recursive mind. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Cutland N (1980) Computability: an introduction to recursion function theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
de Vries MH, Monaghan P, Knecht S, Zwitserlood P (2008) Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: the learnability of embedded hierarchical structures. Cognition 107:763–774
Fitch WT (2010) Three meanings of recursion: key distinctions for biolinguistics. In: Larson R, Déprez V, Yamakido H (eds) The evolution of human language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 73–90
Fitch WT, Hauser MD (2004) Computational constraints on syntactic processing in nonhuman primates. Science 303:377–380
Fodor JA (1983) The modularity of mind. Bradford Books/The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Fodor JA, Bever TG, Garrett MF (1974) The psychology of language. McGraw-Hill, London
Frank SL, Bod R, Christiansen MH (2012) How hierarchical is language use? Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 1–10. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1741
Frazier L (1985) Syntactic complexity. In: Dowty DR, Karttunen L, Zwicky AM (eds) Natural language processing: psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 129–189
Frazier L, Clifton C Jr (1996) Construal. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Frazier L, Fodor JD (1978) The sausage machine: a new two-stage parsing model. Cognition 6:291–325
Friederici AD, Bahlmann J, Heim S, Schubotz RI, Anwander A (2006) The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: functional localization and structural connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(7):2458–2463
Gibson E (1998) Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68:1–76
Grodzinsky Y, Friederici AD (2006) Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16:240–246
Halle M, Stevens KN (1959) Analysis by synthesis. In: Wathen-Dunn W, Woods AM (eds) Proceedings of seminar on speech, compression and processing
Halle M, Stevens KN (1962) Speech recognition: a model and a program for research. IRE Trans PGIT IT 8:155–159
Harley T (2001) The psychology of language. Psychology Press, Sussex
Hofstadter D (1979) Gödel, Escher, Bach: an eternal golden braid. Basic Books Inc, The United States
Hudson R (1996) The difficulty of (so-called) self-embedded structures. UCL Work Pap Linguist 8:1–33
Johnson-Laird PN (2010) Against logical form. Psychologica Belgica 50(3–4):193–221
Kleene SC (1938) On notation for ordinal numbers. J Symb Log 3(4):150–155
Kleene SC (1952) Introduction to metamathematics. North- Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam
Lewis RL (1996) Interference in short-term memory: the magical number two (or three) in sentence processing. J Psycholinguist Res 25(1):93–115
Lewis RL (2000) Specifying architectures for language processing: process, control, and memory in parsing and interpretation. In: Crocker MW, Pickering M, Clifton C Jr (eds) Architectures and mechanisms for language processing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 56–89
Lobina DJ (2011a) Recursion and the competence/performance distinction in AGL tasks. Lang Cognit Process 26(10):1563–1586
Lobina DJ (2011b) “A running back”; and forth: a review of Recursion and Human Language. Biolinguistics 5(1–2):151–169
Lobina DJ (2012) Conceptual structure and emergence of language: much ado about knotting. Int J Philos Stud 20(4):519–539
Lobina DJ (2014) What recursion could not be: a story of conflations. Manuscript
Lobina DJ, García-Albea JE (2009) Recursion and cognitive science: data structures and mechanisms. In: Taatgen NA, van Rijn H (eds) Proceedings of the 31th annual conference of the cognitive science society, pp 1347–1352
Luuk E, Luuk H (2011) The redundancy of recursion and infinity for natural language. Cognit Process 12(1):1–11
MacDonald M, Pearlmutter NJ, Seidenberg MS (1994) Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychol Rev 101(4):676–703
Marr D (1982) Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. W. H. Freeman & Company, San Francisco
Martins MD (2012) Distinctive signatures of recursion. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 367:2055–2064
Martins MJ, Fischmeister FP, Puig-Waldmueller E, Oh J, Geibler A, Robinson S, et al (2014) Fractal image perception provides novel insights into hierarchical cognition. NeuroImage. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.064
Matthews R (1992) Psychological reality of grammars. In: Kasher A (ed) The Chomkyan turn. Blackwell Publishers, London, pp 99–182
Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63(2):81–97
Miller GA, Chomsky N (1963) Finitary models of language users. In: Luce RD, Bush RR, Galanter E (eds) Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol 2. Wiley, New York, pp 419–492
Moschovakis YN, Paschalis V (2008) Elementary algorithms and their implementations. In: Cooper SB, Lowe B, Sorbi A (eds) New computational paradigms. Springer, Berlin, pp 81–118
Piattelli-Palmarini M (1980) Language and learning: the debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Pinker S, Jackendoff R (2005) The faculty of language: what’s special about it? Cognition 95:201–236
Poletiek FH (2002) Implicit learning of a recursive rule in an artificial grammar. Acta Psychologica 111:323–335
Post E (1943) Formal reductions of the general combinatorial decision problem. Am J Math 65(2):197–215
Post E (1944) Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems. In: Davis M (ed) The undecidable. Dover Publications Inc., New York, pp 304–337
Post E (1947) Recursive unsolvability of a problem of Thue. J Symb Log 12:1–11
Pullum GK (2011) On the mathematical foundations of syntactic structures. J Log Lang Inf 20(3):277–296
Pylyshyn Z (1973) The role of competence theories in cognitive psychology. J Psycholinguist Res 2(1):21–50
Pylyshyn Z (1989) Computing in cognitive science. In: Posner MI (ed) Foundations of cognitive science. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 49–92
Rizzi L (2013a) Introduction: core computational principles in natural language syntax. Lingua 130:1–13
Rizzi L (2013b) Locality. Lingua 130:86–169
Roberts E (2006) Thinking recursively with Java. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Samuels R (2002) The spatial reorientation data do not support the thesis that language is the medium of cross-modular thought. Behav Brain Sci 25:697–698
Samuels R (2005) The complexity of cognition: tractability arguments for massive modularity. In: Carruthers P, Laurence S, Stich S (eds) The innate mind volume 1: structure and contents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 107–121
Soare R (1996) Computability and recursion. Bull Symb Log 2(3):284–321
Stabler E (2010) Recursion in grammar and performance. In: Recursion conference in Amherst
Steedman M (2000) The syntactic process. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Tomalin M (2006) Linguistics and the formal sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tomalin M (2011) Syntactic structures and recursive devices: a legacy of imprecision. J Log Lang Inf 20(3):297–315
Townsend D, Bever TG (2001) Sentence comprehension. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Watumull J, Hauser MD, Roberts IG, Hornstein N (2014) On recursion. Front Psychol 4:1–7
Wirth N (1986) Algorithms and data structures. Prentice Hall Publishers, Englewood Cliffs