Ảnh hưởng của các cáo buộc trước đó về quấy rối đến nhận thức của bồi thẩm viên giả định về quấy rối tình dục trong một vụ án hình sự

Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111. Ahola, A., Hellström, A., & Christanson, S. (2010). Is justice really blind? Effects of crime descriptions, defendant gender and appearance, and legal practitioner gender on sentences and defendant evaluations in a mock trial. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 17(2), 304–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218710903566896. Beiner, T. M. (2005). Gender myths v. working realities: Using social science to reformulate sexual harassment law. New York: New York University Press. Bitton, M., & Shaul, D. (2013). Perceptions and attitudes to sexual harassment: An examination of sex differences and the sex composition of the harasser-target dyad. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2136–2145. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12166. Bornstein, B., Golding, J., Neuschatz, J., Kimbrough, C., Reed, K., Magyarics, C., … Luecht, K. (2017). Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 41, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000223. Cummings, K., & Armenta, M. (2002). Penalties for peer sexual harassment in an academic context: The influence of harasser gender, participant gender, severity of harassment, and the presence of bystanders. Sex Roles, 47, 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:10213388. Davies, M., Rogers, P., & Whitelegg, L. (2009). Effects of victim gender, victim sexual orientation, victim response, and respondent gender on judgements of blame in a hypothetical adolescent rape. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1348/978185408X386030. Devine, D. J., & Caughlin, D. E. (2014). Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000006. Devine, D. J., Clayton, L., Dunford, B., Seying, R., & Price, J. (2001). Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 73, 622–727. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8971.7.3.622. Du Mont, J., Miller, K., & Myhr, T. L. (2003). The role of “real rape” and “real victim” stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women, 9, 446–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801202250960. Easteal, P., & Judd, K. (2008). ‘She said, he said’: Credibility and sexual harassment cases in Australia. Women’s Studies International Forum, 31, 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2008.08.009. Fulero, S., & Delara, C. (1976). Rape victims and attributed responsibility: A defensive attribution approach. Victimology, 1, 551–563. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491. Gotovac, S., & Towson, S. (2015). Perceptions of sexual assault victims/survivors: The influence of sexual history and body weight. Violence and Victims, 30, 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-12-00168. Greathouse, S., Levett, L., & Kovera, M. (2009). Sexual harassment: Antecedents, consequences, and juror decisions. In D. A. Krauss & J. D. Lieberman (Eds.), Psychological expertise in court: Psychology in the courtroom (Vol. 2, pp. 151–174). Burlington, VT: Ashgate. Gruber, J. (1992). A typology of personal and environmental sexual harassment: Research and policy implications for the 1990s. Sex Roles, 26, 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289868. Jordan, J. (2004). Beyond belief? Police, rape, and women’s credibility. Criminal Justice, 4, 29–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466802504042222. Katz, R., Hannon, R., & Whitten, L. (1996). Effects of gender and situation on the perception of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 34, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544794. Keller, S., & Weiner, R. (2011). What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 376–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.971. Kelly, J., & Watt, B. (1996). Damages in sexual harassment cases: A comparative study of American, Canadian, and British law. New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law, 16, 79–134. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/nylsintcom16&div=8&id=&page. Mazer, D., & Percival, E. (1989). Students’ experiences of sexual harassment at a small university. Sex Roles, 20, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288023. Mazzella, R., & Feingold, A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(15), 1315–1338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01552.x. McCoy, M., & Gray, J. (2007). The impact of defendant gender and relationship to victim on juror decisions in a child sexual abuse case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1578–1593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00228.x. Neilson, E. C., Gilmore, A. K., Pinsky, H. T., Shepard, M. E., Lewis, M. A., & George, W. H. (2018). The use of drinking and sexual assault protective behavioral strategies: Associations with sexual victimization and revictimization among college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515603977. O’Hare, E., & O’Donohue, W. (1998). Sexual harassment: Identifying risk factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, 561–580. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018769016832. Pozzulo, J., Dempsey, J., Maeder, E., & Allen, L. (2010). The effects of victim gender, defendant gender, and defendant age on juror decision making. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809344173. Quas, J., Bottoms, B., Haegerich, T., & Nysse-Carris, K. (2002). Effects of victim, defendant, and juror gender on decisions in child sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1993–2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02061.x. Roodman, A. A., & Clum, G. A. (2001). Revictimization rates and method variance: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00045-8. Schutte, J. W., & Hosch, H. M. (1997). Gender differences in sexual assault verdicts: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 759–772 Retrieved from https://web-b-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.lib.apsu.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=5&sid=ab6ac664-6e37-4f4a-b839-576b5fb85ec3%40sessionmgr103. Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(2), 101–113. Spohn, C., Beichner, D., & Davis-Frenzel, E. (2001). Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: Guarding the “gateway to justice. Social Problems, 48, 206–235. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2001.48.2.206. Stockdale, M. S., O’Connor, M., Gutek, B. A., & Geer, T. (2002). The relationship between prior sexual abuse and reactions to sexual harassment: Literature review and empirical study. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8, 64–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.8.1.64. Walker, H., Freud, J., Ellis, R., Fraine, S., & Wilson, L. (2019). The prevalence of sexual revictimization: A meta-analytic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21, 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017692364. Wayne, J. H., Riordan, C. M., & Thomas, K. M. (2001). Is all sexual harassment viewed the same? Mock juror decisions in same- and cross-gender cases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.179. Wiener, R., & Hurt, L. (2000). How do people evaluate social sexual conduct at work? A psycholegal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.75. Wiener, R., Hurt, L., Russell, B., Mannen, K., & Gasper, C. (1997). Perceptions of sexual harassment: The effects of gender, legal standard, and ambivalent sexism. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:10248181. Wiener, R., Krauss, D., & Lieberman, J. (2011). Mock jury research: Where do we go from here? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.989. Willness, C., Steel, P., & Lee, K. (2007). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Personnel Psychology, 60, 127–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00067.x.