Primary lymph-node staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET in high-risk prostate cancer: pathologic correlation with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations - Tập 39 - Trang 494.e1-494.e6 - 2021
V.E. Corona-Montes1,2, E. González-Cuenca1,2, G. Fernández-Noyola1, M.A. Olarte-Casas3, D. Bobadilla-Salazar3, H.M. Medrano-Urtecho1,2, A.D. Asimakopoulos4
1Centro de Cirugía Robótica, Centro Médico A.B.C (American British Cowdray) Observatorio, Ciudad de México, México
2Departamento de Urología, Hospital General de México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (UNAM), México
3Unidad de Medicina Nuclear Centro Médico A.B.C, (American British Cowdray) Observatorio, Ciudad de México, México
4UO Urologia, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Roma, Italia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Briganti, 2009, Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer, Eur Urol, 55, 1251, 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.012 Joniau, 2013, Mapping of pelvic lymph node metastases in prostate cancer, Eur Urol, 63, 450, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.057 Mattei, 2008, The template of the primary lymphatic landing sites of the prostate should be revisited: results of a multimodality mapping study, Eur Urol, 53, 118, 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.07.035 Wit, 2017, Sentinel node procedure in prostate cancer: a systematic review to assess diagnostic accuracy, Eur Urol, 71, 596, 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.007 Hövels, 2008, The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis, Clin Radiol, 63, 387, 10.1016/j.crad.2007.05.022 Udovicich, 2017, 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in advanced prostate cancer: Current state and future trends, Prostate Int, 5, 125, 10.1016/j.prnil.2017.02.003 Perera, 2020, Eur Urol, 77, 403, 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.049 Budaeus, 2016, Initial experience of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT imaging in high-risk prostate cancer patients prior to radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 69, 393, 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.010 Demirkol, 2015, Prostate-specific membrane antigen-based imaging in prostate cancer: impact on clinical decision making process, Prostate, 75, 748, 10.1002/pros.22956 Dewes, 2016, Integration of Ga-68-PSMA-PET imaging in planning of primary definitive radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a retrospective study, Radiat Oncol, 11, 73, 10.1186/s13014-016-0646-2 Gupta, 2017, A comparative study of 68Gallium-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for lymph node staging in high risk prostate cancer patients: an initial experience, World J Nucl Med, 16, 186, 10.4103/1450-1147.207272 Gupta, 2017, Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography for prostate cancer: distribution of disease and implications for radiation therapy planning, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 99, 701, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.2448 Maurer, 2015, Preoperative lymph node staging in intermediate to highrisk prostate cancer patients using 68Ga-HBED-PSMA PET hybrid imaging—a patient- and field-based analysis, J Urol, 193, E707, 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2118 Obek, 2017, The accuracy of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT in primary lymph node staging in high-risk prostate cancer, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 44, 1806, 10.1007/s00259-017-3752-y Roach, 2018, The impact of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT on management intent in prostate cancer: results of an Australian prospective multicenter study, J Nucl Med, 59, 82, 10.2967/jnumed.117.197160 Sahlmann, 2016, Biphasic Ga-68-PSMA-HBED-CC-PET/CT in patients with recurrent and high-risk prostate carcinoma, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 43, 898, 10.1007/s00259-015-3251-y Schwenck, 2017, Comparison of Ga-68-labelled PSMA-11 and C-11-choline in the detection of prostate cancer metastases by PET/CT, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 44, 92, 10.1007/s00259-016-3490-6 Sterzing, 2016, Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT: a new technique with high potential for the radiotherapeutic management of prostate cancer patients, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 43, 34, 10.1007/s00259-015-3188-1 van Leeuwen, 2017, Prospective evaluation of 68Gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer, BJU Int, 119, 209, 10.1111/bju.13540 Zhang, 2017, Comparison of Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET-CT with mpMRI for preoperative lymph node staging in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer, J Transl Med, 15, 230, 10.1186/s12967-017-1333-2 Esen, 2020, Can Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT replace conventional imaging modalities for primary lymph node and bone staging of prostate cancer?, Eur Urol Focus, 6, 218, 10.1016/j.euf.2019.05.005 Mottet, 2017, EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent, Eur Urol, 71, 618, 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003 Umbehr, 2013, The role of 11C-choline and 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/CT in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur Urol, 64, 106, 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.019 Maurer, 2016, Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management, Nat Rev Urol, 13, 226, 10.1038/nrurol.2016.26 Corfield, 2018, 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) for primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review, World J Urol, 36, 519, 10.1007/s00345-018-2182-1 Hofman, 2020, Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study, Lancet, 395, 1208, 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30314-7 Yaxley, 2019, Outcomes of primary lymph node staging of intermediate and high risk prostate cancer with 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography/computerized tomography compared to histological correlation of pelvic lymph node pathology, J Urol, 201, 815, 10.1097/JU.0000000000000053 Kim, 2019, Urol Int, 102, 27, 10.1159/000493169 Eiber, 2016, Simultaneous 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET/MRI improves the localization of primary prostate cancer, Eur Urol, 70, 829, 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.053